Whether you are smart or kind depends on how I feel: The influence of positive and negative mood on agency and communion perception

• Authors: Aleksandra Szymkow
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Feelings-as-information theory states that feelings inform us about the nature of our current situation and we rely on them to make our judgments. Beyond that, feelings tune our cognitive processes to meet situational requirements. Positive feelings result in relying on pre-existing knowledge structures and default strategies, whereas negative feelings hamper relying on routines and results in adapting systematic processing. Based on this premise, it was hypothesized that positive mood, elicited either by the perceived target or by the independent source, would lead to relying on accessible agentic or communal content in perceiving strangers, as well as familiar others, whereas negative mood would weaken these tendencies. Specifically, the three studies showed initial evidence that (a) positive mood leads to focusing on agencyrelated qualities in perception of unknown men to a greater extent than negative mood, (b) positive mood leads to focusing on communion-related qualities in perception of unknown women more than negative mood, and(c) positive mood leads to relying on communal content in perception of familiar others comparing to negative mood.

Keywords

EN

agency; communion; feelings-as-information; social perception

• Publisher: Committee for Psychological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 45
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 434-443

Dates

published

2014-12-01

online

2014-12-16

Contributors

author

Aleksandra Szymkow

• University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sopot Campus, Polna 16/20, 81-745 Sopot, Poland;

References

• Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935-948.[Crossref]
• Abele, A. E., Rupprecht, T., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). The influence of success and failure experiences on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 436-448.[Crossref]
• Abele, A., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Alter, A. L. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103, 9369-9372.
• Anderson, N. H. (1971). Integration theory and attitude change.Psychological Review, 78, 171-206.[Crossref]
• Barrett, L. F., & Salovey, P. (Eds.). (2002). The wisdom in feeling: Processes underlying emotional intelligence. New York: Guilford.
• Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.[Crossref]
• Bless, H. (2001). Mood and the use of general knowledge structures. In L.L. Martin & G. L. Clore, (Eds.). Theories of mood and cognition (pp. 9-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Bless, H., Schwarz, N., & Kemmelmeier, M. (1996). Mood and stereotyping: The impactof moods on the use of general knowledge structures. In M. Hewstone & W. Stroebe (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, 7, 63-93.[Crossref]
• Bodenhausen, G.V., Kramer, G.P., & Süsser, K. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinkingin social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621-632.[Crossref]
• Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social perception: The differential impact of anger and sadness.European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45-62.[Crossref]
• Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P. P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143.[Crossref]
• Bush, L. K., Barr, C. L., McHugo, G. J., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1989). The effects of facial control and facial mimicry on subjective reactions to comedy routines. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 31-52.[Crossref]
• Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Bernston, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determination of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extensionhave differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5-17.[Crossref]
• Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Clore, G. L., & Byrne, D. (1974). A reinforcement-affect model of attraction. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 143-170). New York: Academic Press.
• Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. In J.P. Forgas, (Ed.). Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition (pp. 121-144). Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum.
• Clore, G. L., & Gormly, J. B. (1974). Knowing, feeling, and liking: A psychophysiological study of attraction. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 218-230.[Crossref]
• Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences ofsocial information processing. In R. S. Wyer, & T.K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed.; Vol. 1, pp. 323-418). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61-149.[Crossref]
• De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The double meaning of a single act: Influence of the perceiver and the perceived on cooperative behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 13, 165-182.[Crossref]
• Dimberg, U. (1982). Facial reactions to facial expressions.Psychophysiology, 19, 643-647.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Duclos, S. E., Laird, J. D., Schneider, E., Sexter, M., Stern, L., & Van Lighten, O. (1989). Emotion-specific effects of facial expressionsand postures on emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 100-108.[Crossref]
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2003). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Malor Books.
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introductionto theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77-83.[Crossref]
• Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
• Forgas, J.P. (Ed.) (2001). Handbook of affect and social cognition.Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
• Forgas, J.P., Fiedler, K., & Sedikides, C. (Eds.). (2013). Social thinking and interpersonal behaviour. New York: Psychology Press.
• Frank, M.G., & Stennett, J. (2001). The forced-choice paradigm and the perception of facialex pressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 75-85.[Crossref]
• Friedman, R.S., & Förster, J. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477-492.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 33-39.
• Haddock, G., Rothman, A.J., Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Forming judgments of attitude certainty, importance, and intensity: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 771-782.[Crossref]
• Hartley, W. S. (1970). Manual for the twenty statements problem. Kansas City, MO: Department of Research, Greater Kansas City Mental Health Foundation.
• Harmon-Jones, E., & Gable, P. A. (2008). Incorporating motivational intensity and direction into the study of emotions: Implications for brain mechanisms of emotion and cognition-emotion interactions.Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 64, 132-142.[Crossref]
• Harmon-Jones, E., Price, T. F., & Gable, P. A. (2012). The Influence of Affective States on Cognitive Broadening ⁄ Narrowing: Considering the Importanceof Motivational Intensity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6/4, 314-327.
• Isen, A.M., Means, B., Patrick, R., & Nowicki, G. (1982). Some factors influencing decision-making strategy and risk taking. In: M.S. Clark, & S. J. Fiska (Eds.) Affect and Cognition. (pp. 213-261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Judd, C., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005).Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913.[Crossref][PubMed]
• McPartland, T. S., Cumming, J. H., & Garretson, W. (1961). Self-conception and ward behavior in two psychiatric hospitals. Sociometry, 21, 111-124.[Crossref]
• Ottati, V., Terkildsen, N., & Hubbard, C. (1997). Happy faces elicit heuristic processing in a televised impression formation task: A cognitive tuning account. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1144-1156.[Crossref]
• Parzuchowski, M., Szymkow-Sudziarska, A. (2008). Well, Slap my Thigh: Expression of Surprise Facilitates Memory of Surprising Material.Emotion, 8, 430-434.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L.(1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition ofmotor actions. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141.[Crossref]
• Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions ofaffective states. In E.T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford Press.
• Schwarz, N. (2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings: Cognitive tuning. InL. Feldman Barrett & P. Salovey (Eds.), The wisdom in feelings (pp.144-166). New York: Guilford.
• Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. Van Lange, A.Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289-308). Sage.
• Schwarz, N., & Bless, B. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact ofaffective states on analytic reasoning. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgment (pp. 55-71). Oxford: Pergamon.
• Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.[Crossref]
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.[Crossref]
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? Informative functions of affective states. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44-62). Toronto: Hogrefe International.
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences.In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 385-407). New York: Guilford.
• Semin, G. R., Garrido, M. V. & Palma, T. A. (2013, in press). Interfacing body, mind, the physical, and social world: Socially Situated Cognition. In D. E. Carlston (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Smith, E. R., & Conrey, F. R. (2009). The social context of cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 454-466). Cambridge University Press.
• Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53-117.[Crossref]
• Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If it’s difficult-to-pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20, 135-138.[Crossref]
• Stepper, S., & Strack, F. (1993). Proprioceptive determinants ofemotional and nonemotional feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 211- 220.[Crossref]
• Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A non-obtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 53, 768-777.[Crossref]
• Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Williams, J. E., Satterwhite, R. C., & Best, D. L. (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited: The Five Factor Model. Sex Roles, 40, 513-525.
• Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions. Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.[Crossref]
• Wojciszke, B. (2010). Sprawczość i wspólnotowość. Podstawowe wymiaryspostrzegania społecznego. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
• Wojciszke, B., & Abele, A. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139-1147.[Crossref]
• Wojciszke, B. (1994). Multiple meanings of behaviour: Construing actions in terms of competence or morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222-232.[Crossref]
• Wojciszke, B., Baryła, W. (2005). Skale do pomiaru nastroju i sześciu emocji. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 11, 31-47.
• Wojciszke, B., Baryla, W., Parzuchowski, M., Szymkow, A., & Abele, A. E. (2011). Self-esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 617-627.[Crossref]
• Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1245-1257.
• Wyer, R. S., & Carlston, D. (1979). Social cognition, inference, and attribution. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Ybarra, O., Chan, E., & Park. D. C. (2001). Young and old adults’ concerns with morality and competence. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 85-100. [Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/ppb-2014-0053