PL EN


Journal
2014 | 7 | 1 | 29-76
Article title

Structure of the EU28 plus ukraine economic region from the growth pole theory perspective

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Economic and debt crisis in Europe has brought along the question which member states could become a source of future economic growth of EU28 region. With respect to this question, this paper aims to contribute to this debate by identifying possible economic growth poles within the EU28 economic region. In light of recent debate centered on the future of the Ukraine we use a broad definition of the European economic space with EU28 as well as the Ukraine included. Our results show that the dominance of the United Kingdom has been successfully challenged by Germany and Poland represents the only country from the “new” EU countries that can be labeled as a European growth pole. Additionally, the heterogeneous distribution of growth pole potential partially resembles the distribution based on Zipf’s law but with a growth potential concentrated more in the upper part than in the case of Zipf’s law benchmark.
Publisher
Journal
Year
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
29-76
Physical description
Dates
published
2014-12-01
online
2014-12-30
Contributors
  • University of Economics in Bratislava Faculty of National Economy Department of Banking and International Finance, jana.kotlebova@euba.sk
  • University of Economics in Bratislava Faculty of National Economy Department of Banking and International Finance, maria.siranova@euba.sk
References
  • [1] ADAMS-KANE, J. - LIM, J. J. (2011). Growth Poles and Multipolarity. Policy Research Working Paper 5712. The World Bank Development Economics Prospects Group.
  • [2] ASLUND, A. (2013). Ukraine’s Choice: European Association Agreement or Eurasian Union? Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief No 13-22, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • [3] AYDALOT, P. (1965). Note sur les economies externes et quelques notions connexes. Revue Economique, Vol. 16, pp. 944-973.
  • [4] BOUDEVILLE, J. R. (1966). Problems of Regional Economic Planning, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • [5] BUCH, M.C., KUCKULENZ, A., (2010). Worker remittances and capital flows to developing countries. International Migration, 48, pp. 89-117.[Crossref][WoS]
  • [6] ÇIÇEK, HÜSEYÍN. (2013). Critical Evaluation of Endogeneous Regional Development Theories. PhD thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University.
  • [7] CRESPO, J. - SUIRE, R. - VICENTE, J. (2012). Lock-in or lockout? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience? Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 12/04, Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht.[WoS]
  • [8] CRISTEA, M. (2013). The Applications of Growth Pole Theories and Concept in Romania. PhD thesis, The Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • [9] CHRISTOFAKIS, M. - PAPADASKALOPOULOS, A. (2011). The growth pole strategy in regional planning: The recent experience of Greece. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 5-20.
  • [10] EATON, J. - KORTUM, S. (2002). Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica, 70(5), pp. 1741- 1779.
  • [11] FOSFURI, A. - MOTTA, M. RØNDE, T. (2001). Foreign Direct Investment and Spillovers Through Workers’ Mobility. Journal of International Economics, 53(1), pp. 205-222.
  • [12] FRANKEL, J. A. - ROMER, D. A. (1999). Does Trade Cause Growth? American Economic Review, 89(3), pp. 379-399.
  • [13] GABAIX, X. (2009). Power Laws in Economics and Finance. Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 225-293.
  • [14] GILBERT, A. (1974). Growth poles: the instant solution to regional problems? In R.S. Thoman (ed.) Proceedings of the Commission on Regional Aspects of Development (Vol. I: Methodology and Case Studies), pp. 111-128, Toronto: Allister Publishing.
  • [15] HIRSCHMAN, O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
  • [16] International Monetary Fund (2009). Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual. Sixth Edition. Washington, D. C.: IMF.
  • [17] IVANTER, V. et al. (2012). The Economic Effects of the Creation of the Single Economic Space and Potential Accession of Ukraine. In Eurasian Integration Yearbook 2012. Almaty, Kazakhstan: Eurasian Development Bank.
  • [18] LASSUÉN, J. R. (1969). On Growth Poles. Urban Studies, Vol. 6, pp. 137-161.[Crossref]
  • [19] Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic (2006). National Strategic Reference Framework of the Slovak Republic for 2007 - 2013, Bratislava: Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic.
  • [20] MOSELEY, M. J. (1973). Growth centres: a shibboleth? Area, Vol. 5, pp. 143-150.
  • [21] MOVCHAN, V. - GIUCCI, R. (2011). Quantitative Assessment of Ukraine’s Regional Integration Options: DCFTA with European Union vs. Customs Union with Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Policy Paper PP/05/2011, Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting.
  • [22] PARR, J. B. (1973). Growth poles, regional development and central place theory. Papers of the Regional Science Association, No. 31, pp. 174-212.
  • [23] PARR, J. B. (1999). Growth-pole Strategies in Regional Economic Planning: A Retrospective View: Part 1. Origins and Advocacy. Urban Studies Journal, Vol. 36, No. 7, pp. 1195-1215.
  • [24] PERROUX, F. (1950). Economic Space: Theory and Application. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 64, pp. 89-104.[Crossref]
  • [25] PERROUX, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de pôle de croissance. Economie Appliquée, No. 8, pp. 307-320.
  • [26] RAO, B.B., HASSAN, G.H., (2012). Are the direct and indirect growth effects of remittances significant? World Economy, 35, pp. 351-372.[Crossref][WoS]
  • [27] SAICHEV, A. - MALEVERGNE, Y. - SORNETTE, D. (2010). Theory of Zipf’s Law and Beyond. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • [28] SPEAKMAN, J. - KOIVISTO. (2013). Growth Poles: Raising Competitiveness and Deepening Regional Integration. The Africa Competitiveness Report 2013, World Bank World Economic Forum, Washington: World. Bank.
  • [29] TARR, D. (2012). The Eurasian Customs Union among Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan: Can It Succeed Where Its Predecessor Failed? New Economic School Working Paper. Moscow: New Economic School.
  • [30] THOMAS, M. D. (1975). Growth Pole Theory, Technological Change, and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Science, Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 3-25.
  • [31] World Bank (2009). World Development Report. Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington: The World Bank.
  • [32] World Bank (2010). Prospects for Growth Poles in Mozambique. Washington: The World Bank, Finance and Private Sector Development, Africa Region.
  • [33] World Bank (2011). Global Development Horizons 2011. Multipolarity: The New Global Economy. Washington: The World Bank.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_regd-2014-0002
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.