PL EN


Journal
2011 | 21 | 3 | 294-303
Article title

Local disposition to environmental protection, poverty alleviation and other issues in the sustainable development agenda in Ondo State, Nigeria

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Sustainable development is the global agenda designed to ensure that the world’s climate is not irretrievably damaged and future generations have equal access to the world’s resources for their own development. The institutionalisation of measures to promote sustainable development has however not had unanimous cooperation. This study therefore investigated the attitude of officials at the local government level to topical issues in the sustainable development agenda in Ondo State, Nigeria, as a pointer to entrenched attitudes in the Third World. Prioritisation of issues varied between localities but premium was placed on poverty alleviation more than on climate change or power generation. People were more concerned with the improvement of their general well-being including health. Respondents indicated that most of the topical issues on the sustainable development agenda could be addressed at the local level thereby lending support for the notion that local action can contribute to global action. However, inclusive measures to promote positive action need to be institutionalised.
Publisher
Journal
Year
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
294-303
Physical description
Dates
published
2011-09-01
online
2011-09-22
Contributors
author
  • Adekunle Ajasin University
References
  • [1] Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications. Winnipeg, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development, 123pp.
  • [2] Cooper, D. (2001). Community Strategy Guidance - An Early Assessment by Local Government. EGpromoting local, 7(1), 9–10.
  • [3] Chruscinski, D. (2011). What Is Set Aside Farming? http://www.ehow.com/facts_5003857_what-setaside-farming.html
  • [4] Church, C., Elster, J. (2002). Thinking Locally, Acting Nationally: Lessons for Policy from Local Action on Sustainable Development. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • [5] Church, C., Young, S. (2000). The Future of Local Agenda 21 after the Local Government Act of July 2000: A Discussion Paper, EPRU, Manchester.
  • [6] FGN (1999). The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
  • [7] Fisher, M. (1999). What Future for Local Agenda 21? EG-Local Environment News 5(5), 5–6.
  • [8] FMF (2010). Distribution Details of Revenue Allocation to Local Government Councils by Federation Account Allocation Committee. Federal Ministry of Finance. http://www.fmf.gov.ng/downloads/FAAC/CurrentFaacDetail/Local_goverment_detail.pdf
  • [9] IUCN/IISD/SEI/SDC (2003). Livelihoods and Climate Change: Combining disaster risk reduction, natural resource management and climate change adaptation in a new approach to the reduction of vulnerability and poverty. IUCN; International Institute for Sustainable Development; Stockholm Environment Institute; Swiss Development Cooperation; Intercooperation; Task Force on Climate Change, Vulnerable Communities and Adaptation. Winnipeg, MB: IISD, pp. 24.
  • [10] Living Countryside (2011). Set-Aside. http://www.ukagriculture.com/crops/setaside.cfm
  • [11] Lucas, K., Ross, A., Fuller, S. (2001). Local Agenda 21: When is it a Model for Joined-up Community Based Activity? Joseph Rowntree Foundation, pp. 28.
  • [12] ODSG (2010). About Ondo State. Ondo State Government, Nigeria. http://www.ondostate.gov.ng/ondo_state.htm
  • [13] Olumekun, V.O., Delf, J. Rooney, P. Crawford, K. (2007). The Niger Delta Oil Induced Crisis: Beyond Environmental Pollution and into the Realms of the Struggle for Resource Control. Journal of Applied and Environmental Science 3(2) 44–51.
  • [14] Olumekun, V.O., Ige, O.E., Rooney, P. (2008). The Status of LA21 in Nigeria: Ondo State as a Case Study. Global Journal of Environmental Sciences 7(1&2), 43–52.
  • [15] Onibokun, A.G. (2003). The State of Implementation Report on Human Settlements in Africa. A Publication of the Centre for African Settlement Studies and Development for UN Secretary General’s State of Implementation Report on Human Settlements for CSD-12, pp. 92.
  • [16] Oppenoorth, H, Koene, M., Staarink, I. (2007). The Bali Guide on CDM, towards a Sustainable CDM. Utrecht/The Hague, November 2007.
  • [17] Pinfield, G., Saunders, J. (2000). Community Strategies and LA21 Strategies, eg-promoting local sustainable development 6(8), 15–18.
  • [18] Rogerson, R. (1997). Quality of Life in Britain. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
  • [19] RPA-DEFRA (2009). Single Payment Scheme - Information for Farmers and Growers in England - January 2009 update. Produced by Rural Payments Agency (RPA) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. UK, pp. 22.
  • [20] Selman, P. (1998). Local Agenda 21: Substance or Spin? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41(5), 533–553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640569811443[Crossref]
  • [21] UN (2004). 2004 Survey for Reporting on National Sustainable Development Strategies (NSDS). United Nations, New York.
  • [22] UN (2005). Implementation of Agenda 21: Review of Progress Made Since The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 1992. http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/nigeria/eco.htm
  • [23] UNCED (1992). Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, United Nations General Assembly, New York.
  • [24] UNDP (2004). UNDP Environmental Mainstreaming Strategy: A strategy for enhanced environmental soundness and sustainability in UNDP policies, programmes, and operational processes. United Nations Development Programme, pp. 21.
  • [25] WCED (1987). Our Common Future: The Brundtland Report, World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_s13374-011-0030-8
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.