Possible application of deliberative democracy in parliament

• Authors: Branislav Dolný
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Deliberative democracy, as a dominant paradigm in contemporary democratic theory, offers a new, attractive conception of democratic legitimacy, which represents an alternative to a democracy that functions through the mechanism of political competition. A major problem with deliberation is the issue of its institutionalisation, as the theories of deliberative democracy have not produced a more specific institutional framework or form in which it could be used in political practice. Parliaments appear to be particularly suitable places for its potential implementation. Moreover, deliberative democracy could contribute to a change in discourse quality and the way decision-making is conducted in parliaments, which is often considered problematic. Due to its incompatibility with competitive democracy, the opportunities for introducing deliberative democracy into parliaments are very limited. The study also outlines three ways of reconciling deliberative democracy and parliaments.

Keywords

EN

deliberative democracy; political competition; parliaments; parliamentary debates

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 21
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 422-436

Dates

published

2011-12-01

online

2011-12-25

Contributors

author

Branislav Dolný

• Comenius University

References

• [1] Bächtinger, A., Hangartner, D., Hess, P., Fraefell, C. (2008). Patterns of Parliamentary Discourse: How Deliberative are German Legislative Debates? German Politics 17, 270–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644000802300486[Crossref][WoS]
• [2] Bächtinger, A., Pedrini, S. (2010). Dissecting Deliberative Democracy. A Review of Theoretical Concepts and Empirical Findings. In M. Wolf, L. Morales, K. Ikeda (Eds.). Political Discussion in Modern Democracies. A Comparative Perspective, pp. 9–25. London: Routledge.
• [3] Behrouzi, M. (2005). Democracy as the Political Empowerment of the People. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
• [4] Besson, S., Martí, J.L. (2006). Introduction. In S. Besson, J.L. Martí (Eds.). Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents, pp. xiii–xxxi. Aldershot: Ashgate.
• [5] Carter, A., Stokes, G. (2002). Democratic Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• [6] Carey, J. (2009). Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [7] Chappell, Z. (2007). Are We Ready? Assessing the Preconditions of Deliberative Democracy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
• [8] Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Legitimacy. In A. Hamlin, P. Pettit (Eds.). The Good Polity, pp. 17–34. Oxford: Blackwell.
• [9] Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• [10] Elster, J. (1998). Introduction. In J. Elster (Ed.). Deliberative Democracy, pp.1–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [11] Fishkin, J.S. (1995). The Voice of the People. Public Opinion & Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• [12] Goodin, R. (2008). Innovating Democracy. Democratic Theory and Practice after Deliberative Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• [13] Gutmann, A., Thompson, D. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• [14] Hayward, C.R. (2009). Making Interest: On Representation and Democratic Legitimacy. In I. Shapiro, S.C. Stokes, E.J. Wood, A.S. Kirshner (Eds.). Political Representation, pp.111–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [15] Landwehr, C. (2009). Political Conflict and Political Preferences. Colchester: ECPR Press.
• [16] Landwehr, C., Holzinger, K. (2010). Institutional Determinants of Deliberative Interaction. European Political Science Review 2, 373–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000226[WoS][Crossref]
• [17] Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• [18] Mansbridge, J. (1999). Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System. In S. Macedo (Ed.). Deliberative Politics. Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, pp.211–242. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• [19] Martí, J.L. (2006). The Epistemic Conception of Deliberative Democracy Defended. In S. Besson, J.L. Martí (Eds.). Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents, pp. 27–56. Aldershot: Ashgate.
• [20] McGann, A. (2006). The Logic of Democracy. Reconciling Equality, Deliberation and Minority Protection. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• [21] Mesežnikov, G. (2009). Vnútropolitický vývoj a systém politických strán. In M. Bútora, M. Kollár, G. Mesežnikov (Eds.). Slovensko 2008. Súhrnná správa o stave spoločnosti. Bratislava: IVO.
• [22] Plichtová, J. (2010). Občianska deliberatívna demokracia a podpora jej cieľov na Slovensku. Sociológia 42, 516–547.
• [23] Rummens, S. (2011). Staging Deliberation: The Role of Representative Institutions in the Deliberative Democratic Process. The Journal of Political Philosophy, forthcoming. [WoS]
• [24] Sartori, G. (2001). Srovnávací ústavní inženírství. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
• [25] Saward, M. (2000). Democratic Innovation. In M. Saward (Ed.). Democratic Innovation. Deliberation, Representation and Association, pp. 3–16. London: Routledge.
• [26] Scharpf, F. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Wesview Press.
• [27] Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations. Designing Institutions for Citizens Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609848[Crossref]
• [28] Steenberger, M., Bächtinger, A., Spörndli, M., Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index. Comparative European Politics, 21–48.
• [29] Steiner, J., Bächtinger, A., Spörndli, M. (2001). The Real World of Deliberation: Favorable Conditions and Substantive Outcomes. Paper presented at the 1st ECPR General Conference, Canterbury.
• [30] Steiner, J., Bächtinger, A., Spörndli, M., Steenbergen, M. (2004). Deliberative Politics in Action. Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [31] van Mill, D. (2006). Deliberation, Social Choice and Absolutist Democracy. London: Routledge.
• [32] Warren, M.E. (2007). Institutionalizing Deliberative Democracy. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. Can People Govern?, pp. 272–288. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• [33] Warren, M.E., Pearse, H. (2008). Introduction: Democratic Renewal and Deliberative Democracy. In M. E. Warren, H. Pearse (Eds.). Designing Deliberative Democracy, pp. 1–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491177.002[Crossref]
• [34] Weale, A. (2006). Party Competition and Deliberative Democracy. In J. Bara, A. Weale (Eds.). Democratic Politics and Party Competition, pp. 271–286. London: Routledge.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/s13374-011-0041-5