The Romani language in the Slovak educational system

• Authors: Tina Gažovičová
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper analyses the use of the Romani language in the Slovak educational system. It focuses on the informal use of Romani in schools, as about 10% of all pupils speak Romani as their mother tongue but there are no schools that use Romani as the language of instruction. The theoretical framework draws mainly on the work of P. Bourdieu and S. May on the symbolic power of language. The empirical chapter is based on qualitative data collected at ten primary schools in different parts of Slovakia, as well as interviews with decision makers and experts. On the basis of the empirical research, three questions are posed. (1) Is Romani used in schools and if so how? (2) What attitudes do school staff have on the use of Romani? (3) Is the theory of Stephen May applicable to Slovakia and is Romani perceived to have merely sentimental value while Slovak is considered to have instrumental value? The article concludes that the perceived value of Romani in Slovakia is very low. From the point of view of school staff, it has no instrumental value and is perceived as a barrier rather than a benefit.

Keywords

EN

Romani language; education; minority language; majority language; symbolic power of language

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 22
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 510-523

Dates

published

2012-10-01

online

2012-09-29

Contributors

author

Tina Gažovičová

• Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences

References

• [1] Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
• [2] Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage Publications.
• [3] Census 2012. Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic, http://portal.statistics.sk.
• [4] Eisner, E. (1994). The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. New York: Macmillan.
• [5] Friedman, E. et al. (2009). School as a Ghetto. Budapest: Roma Education Fund.
• [6] García, O. (2009). Bilingual Education in the 21 stCentury. A Global Perspective. West Sussex: Wiley - Blackwell.
• [7] Gažovičová, T. (Ed.). (2011). Vzdelávanie detí cudzincov na Slovensku - potreby a riešenia. Bratislava: Centrum pre výskum etnicity a kultúry - Nadácia Milana Šimečku.
• [8] Hapalová, M., Daniel, S. (2008). Rovný prístup rómskych detí ku kvalitnému vzdelávaniu. Aktualizácia 2008. Bratislava: Člověk v tísni - pobočka na Slovensku.
• [9] Lewis, P. (Ed.). (2009). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Sixteenth edition. Dallas, Tex.: SIL International. Online version: http://www.eth.
• [10] May, S. (2003). Misconceiving Minority Language Rights: Implications for Liberal Political Theory. In W. Kymlicka, A. Patten (Eds.). Language Rights and Political Theory, pp. 123–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• [11] May, S. (2011). Language Policy. In M. Grenfell et al. Bourdieu, Language and Linguistics, pp. 147–169. London: Continuum.
• [12] Milner, R. (2010). Introduction. In R. Milner (Ed.). Culture, Curriculum and Identity in Education, pp.1–14. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230105669[Crossref]
• [13] Paulsten, C.B., Tucker, R. (Eds.). (2003). Sociolinguistics: the Essential Readings. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
• [14] Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• [15] Tomatová, J. (2004). Na vedľajšej koľaji. Je proces zaraďovania rómskych detí do špeciálnych základných škôl znevýhodňujúcim činiteľom? Bratislava: Slovak Governance Institute.
• [16] ÚIPŠ - Ústav informácií a prognóz školstva. (2011). Štatistická ročenka - základné školy. Školský rok 2011/12. www.uips.sk
• [17] UNDP. (2004). Cultural Liberty in Today’s Diverse World. Human Development Report 2004. New York: UNDP.
• [18] Úrad splnomocnenca vlády SR pre rómske komunity. (2004). Atlas rómskych komunít. http://www.romovia.vlada.gov.sk
• [19] Vaňo, B. (2002). Prognóza vývoja rómskeho obyvateľstva v SR do roku 2025. Bratislava: Infostat.
• [20] Wertz, F.J. et al. (2011). Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis. New York - London: The Guilford Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/s13374-012-0041-0