Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2013 | 23 | 3 | 443-457

Article title

Social trust, norms and morality

Authors

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The article approaches the topic of social trust from an evolutionary perspective. It begins by summarising the most influential approaches that have defined specific and social trust and ascertains what causes differences in degrees of trust and how the potential risk of deception might be lowered. It then notes that the basis of morality had already been formed during the era of prehistoric man, who was able to create coalitions against aggressors and to socially control the behaviour of deviants. It points out, however, that having a certain predisposition to behaving cooperatively or an increased sensitivity to recognising and not tolerating behaviour aimed at abusing cooperation is not a sufficient guarantee of the fact that people will always (or at least in the majority of situations) favour cooperation over deception. One of the reasons for this is a tendency to favour short-term gains over long-term ones. The article argues that establishing norms (moral, social and legal) produces a higher level of social trust because it not only “encourages” individuals to behave in certain ways in particular situations but also works as a sanction which “discourages” the individual from socially deviant behaviour. The article then focuses on a debate about the causal relationship between social trust and social capital. It discusses the suggestion that political institutions, government and the judiciary may reduce rather than raise levels of social capital and consequently also the level of social trust. This is partly because of their powerful position and the consequent scope for corruption and partly because of the fact that even when attempting to act honestly, representatives of these institutions cannot sufficiently reflect upon dynamic change at the local level. Finally, the article ends by adopting the position that social trust is built primarily from bottom up and so it is risky to continually doubt the very existence and usefulness of social norms and morality and to be governed simply by legal norms.

Keywords

Publisher

Journal

Year

Volume

23

Issue

3

Pages

443-457

Physical description

Dates

published
2013-07-01
online
2013-06-28

Contributors

  • Slovak Academy of Sciences

References

  • [1] Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164191[Crossref]
  • [2] Alexander, R. D. (1987). The Biology of Moral Systems. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • [3] Bicchieri, C. (2006). The Grammar of Society. The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • [4] Bjrnskov, C. (2006). Determinants of Generalized Trust: A Cross-Country Comparison. Public Choice 130, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9069-1[Crossref]
  • [5] Boehm, Ch. (2002). Conflict and the Evolution of Social Control. In Leonard D. Katz (Ed.). Evolutionary Origins of Morality, pp. 130–139. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
  • [6] Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp. 241–258. New York: Greenwood.
  • [7] Buskens, V. (2002). Social Networks and Trust. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • [8] Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • [9] Delhey, J., Newton, K. (2003). Who Trusts? The Origins of Social Trust in Seven Societies. European Societies 5,2, 93–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000072256[Crossref]
  • [10] Diamond. J. (2008). Kolaps. Proč společnosti zanikají a přežívají. Praha: Academia.
  • [11] Fabio, U. D. (2009). Kultura svobody. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
  • [12] Frank, R. H. (1990). A Theory of Moral Sentiments. In J.J. Mansbridge (Ed.). Beyond Self-Interest, pp. 71–96. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • [13] Fukuyama, F. (2006). Velký rozvrat. Lidská přirozenost a rekonstrukce společenského řádu. Praha: Academia.
  • [14] Gerritsen, D., Lubbers, M. (2010). Unknown Is Unloved? Diversity and Inter-population Trust in Europe. European Union Politics 2, 267–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116510363311[Crossref][WoS]
  • [15] Grönlund, K., Setälä, M. (2011). In Honest Officials We Trust: Institutional Confidence in Europe. American Review of Public Administration XX(X), 1–20. [WoS]
  • [16] Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions about Moral Psychology. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.). Moral Psychology. Vol. 2. The Cognitive Science and Morality: Intuition and Diversity, pp. 181–217. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • [17] Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. I, II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4[Crossref]
  • [18] Herreros, F. (2004). The Problem of Forming Social Capital: Why Trust? New York: Palgrave Macmillian. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403978806[Crossref]
  • [19] Jackson, J., Hough, M., Bradford, B., Pooler, T., Hohl, K., Kuha, J. (2011). Trust in Justice: Topline Results from Round 5. http://www.icpr.org.uk/media/32166/Topline%20Results%20from%20Round%205%20of%20the%20ESS.pdf
  • [20] Knauft, B. M. (2002). Symbols, Sex, and Sociality in the Evolution of Human Morality. In Leonard D. Katz (Ed.). Evolutionary Origins of Morality, pp. 130–139. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
  • [21] Loury, G. C. (1977). A Dynamic Theory of Racial Income Differences. In P.A. Wallace and A. M. LaMond (Eds.). Women, Minorities and Employment Discrimination, pp. 153–186. Lexington: Lexington Books.
  • [22] Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • [23] Robbins, B. G. (2011). Neither Government Nor Community Alone: A Test of State-Centered Models of Generalized Trust. Rationality and Society 23(3), 304–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043463111404665[WoS][Crossref]
  • [24] Rothstein, B. (2005). Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490323[Crossref]
  • [25] Roumeliotou, M., Rontos, K. (2009). Social Trust in Local Communities and Its Demographic, Socioeconomic Predictors: The Case of Kalloni, Lesvos, Greece. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 2,1, 230–250.
  • [26] Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD Triad Hypothesis: A Mapping between Three Moral Emotions (Contempt, Anger, Disgust) and Three Moral Codes (Community, Autonomy, Divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76,4, 574–586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574[Crossref]
  • [27] Trivers, R. L. (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46, 35–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/406755[Crossref]
  • [28] Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_s13374-013-0140-6
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.