Philosophical counselling based on dialogical critical thinking

• Authors: Blanka Šulavíková
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Various approaches and methods are used in philosophical counselling. Two main trends can be observed: the first is the use of contemplative methods and the second constitutes approaches based on dialogical critical thinking. The author defends the idea that developing philosophical counselling on the basis of critical thinking presupposes that it is possible for counsellor and client to hold a philosophical dialogue where the relationship is one of expert/lay person. J. Šulavík has described this relationship in greater detail. In the Socratic model, the philosopher and the lay person hold a dialogue whereby they ascertain opinions via inductive comparison and by defining things, creating a shared concept. While the Platonic and Enlightenment models were grounded in the authority of the expert philosopher, in the Socratic and postmodern models, the expert philosopher loses the power to manipulate those who know “less”. Lay people are not passive consumers of a particular “optimal” philosophy but through their own “philosophising” create philosophy and tailor it for themselves. While philosophising, therefore, the philosopher does not take on the role of “producer” of philosophy but of “adviser” (consultant). It is therefore supposed that people have a general need for philosophy and that ultimately they should create and reflect upon their own philosophy.

Keywords

EN

philosophical counselling; critical thinking; Socratic dialogue

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 23
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 680-688

Dates

published

2013-10-01

online

2013-09-28

Contributors

author

Blanka Šulavíková

• Slovak Academy of Sciences

References

• [1] Achenbach, G. A. (1995). Philosophy, Philosophical Practice and Psychotherapy. In R. Lahav, M. Tillmans (Eds.). Essays on Philosophical Counseling, pp. 61–74. Lanham, New York and London: University Press of America.
• [2] Amir, L. B. (2004). Three Questionable Assumptions of Philosophical Practice. The International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2.1, pp. 9–18. Available at: americanspcp.com/docs/ijpp/lydiaamir.pdf .
• [3] Amir, L. B. (2006). More Philosophy, less Counseling: A Method for Philosophical Counseling. In J. B. Rastrojo, J. O. Garcia, F. M. Garfia (Eds.). Philosophy and Practice: From Theory to Practice, pp. 33–39. Sevilla: Ediciones, X–XI.
• [4] Boele, D. (1995). Experimental Wisdom and the Art of Living. In R. Lahav, M. Tillmans. Essays on Philosophical Counseling. Lanham, New York and London: University Press of America.
• [5] Buber, M. (1995). Já a Ty. [I and Thou]. Olomouc: Votobia.
• [6] Curnow, T. (1999). Thinking about Dialogue. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 45–51. Oxford: Wadham College.
• [7] Chamberlain, H. S. (1999). Philosophical Counselling: A Dialogue in Critical Thinking. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 34–43. Oxford: Wadham College.
• [8] Delnoij, J. (1999). Short Socratic Dialogue Workshop. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 52–53. Oxford: Wadham College. Available at: www.insightassessment.com/what&why2010.
• [9] Facione, P. A. (2004). Critical Thinking: What It is and Why It Counts. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press. Available at: www.mdaa.org.au/archive/05/manual/app2.pdf.
• [10] Fisher, R. (2005). Socratic Education: A New Paradigm for Philosophical Enquiry? Creative and Critical Thinking, 4.1, 15–45.
• [11] Grimes, P. (1997). A Study of Philosophical Midwifery. Available at: coffeewithpierre.com/?q=node/9 .
• [12] Lahav, R. (2006). Philosophical Practice as Contemplative Philo-Sophia. Practical Philosophy 8, 1.
• [13] Lebon, T. (1999). Socrates, Philosophical Counselling and Thinking through Dialogue. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 131–142. Oxford: Wadham College.
• [14] Marinoff, L. (2002). Philosophical Practice. San Diego, New York, Boston, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press.
• [15] Nelson, L. (1949). Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy. New York: Dover.
• [16] Prins-Bakker, A. (1995). Philosophy in Marriage Counseling. In R. Lahav, M. Tillmans (Eds.). Essays on Philosophical Counseling, pp. 135–151. Lanham, New York and London: University Press of America.
• [17] Rogers, C. R. (2000). Klientom centrovaná terapia. [Client-Centered Therapy]. [Modra: IRO.
• [18] Rogers, C. R. (1997). Spôsob bytia. [A Way of Being]. Modra: IRO.
• [19] Schuster, S. C. (1999a). Philosophy Practice: An Alternative to Counseling and Psychotherapy. Westport and London: Praeger.
• [20] Schuster, S. C. (1999b). Philosophy Practices as Alternative Ways to Well-being. Radical Psychology 1, No.1. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol1-1/Schuster.html (accessed August 30, 2013).
• [21] Šulavík, J. (2001). Metafilozofické implikácie psychoterapie. [Metaphilosphical Implications of Psychoteraphy]. Bratislava: Album.
• [22] Šulavíková, B. (2006). Autenticita a dobrý život. [Authenticity and the Good Life.] Bratislava: Album.
• [23] Tuedio, J. A. (1998). Philosophical Counseling as a Window on the Abstract Realities of Everyday Life. Department of Philosophy, California State University, Stanislaus.
• [24] Wollner, U. (2010). Starostlivosť o seba v Xenofóntovom diele Memorabilia. In V. Suvák (Ed.). Sebapoznanie a/ko starosť o seba, pp. 32–78. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta v Prešove.
• [25] Xenofón. (1972). Vzpomínky na Sokrata. [Recollections of Socrates]. Praha: Svoboda.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/s13374-013-0157-x