PL EN


Journal
2014 | 24 | 4 | 481-491
Article title

Reflections on solidarity in global and transnational environment: Issue of social recognition in the context of the potential and limitations of the media

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The present article deals with issues of social recognition in the global and transnational environment. It deals with the issue of solidarity, a form of recognition that has no adequate parallel beyond nation state borders and manifests itself mainly in the transnational economy. We focus on the articulation of the extraterritorial recognition of social rights-holders at the international and transnational levels of justice. It is clear that conditions in developing countries do not allow the people there to express disapproval in ways that are typical for Western societies. We stress that states should strengthen their influence in global and transnational organizations and equally that the media should improve its informative role and should provide information on what is happening in developing parts of the world.
Publisher
Journal
Year
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
481-491
Physical description
Dates
published
2014-10-01
online
2014-10-02
Contributors
author
References
  • [1] Dunaj, Ľ. (2010). Reflections on justice under the context of globalization. Human Affairs, 20(2), 124–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10023-010-0014-z[Crossref]
  • [2] Fraser, N., Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London, New York: Verso.
  • [3] Gálik, S. (2012). Filozofia a médiá. K filozofickej reflexii vplyvu médií na utváranie (súčasnej) kultúry. Bratislava: IRIS.
  • [4] Hallin, D. C., Mancini, P. (2008). Systémy médií v postmoderním světě. Tři modely médií a politiky. Praha: Portál.
  • [5] Hegel, G. W. F. (1960). Fenomenologie ducha. Praha: Nakladatelství Československé Akademie Věd.
  • [6] Heins, V. (2008). Realizing Honneth: Redistribution, recognition and global justice. Journal of Global Ethics, 4(2), 141–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449620802194025[Crossref]
  • [7] Honneth, A. (1992). Integrity and disrespect. Principles of conception of morality based on the theory of recognition. Political Theory, 20(2), 187–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591792020002001[Crossref]
  • [8] Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: Moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • [9] Honneth, A. (2000). Suffering from indeterminacy. An attempt at a reactualization of Hegel’s philosophy of right. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.
  • [10] Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom’s right: The social foundations of democratic life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • [11] Hrubec, M. (2010a). The law of peoples and global justice: Beyond the liberal nationalism of John Rawls. Human Affairs 20 (2), 135–150.
  • [12] Hrubec, M. (2010b). Preconditions of intercultural dialogue on human rights. Veritas, 55(1), 183–205.
  • [13] Hrubec, M. (2011a). Od zneuznání ke spravedlnosti. Kritická teorie globální společnosti a politiky. Praha: FILOSOFIA.
  • [14] Hrubec, M. (2011b). Kritická koncepce mezinárodního uspořádání. Axel Honneth o uznání mezi státy. Filozofia, 66(5), 405–422.
  • [15] Hrubec, M. (2013). An articulation of extra-territorial recognition: toward international and supranational solutions of global poverty. In T. Burns & S. Thompson (Eds.), Global justice and the politics of recognition. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • [16] Hrubec, M. (2014). Interstate recognition and its global overcoming. In N. Oliveira, M. Hrubec, G. Saavedra, & E. Sobottka, (Eds.), Justice and recognition. Porto Alegre: PUCRS & Prague: FILOSOFIA.
  • [17] Mead, H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.
  • [18] McCombs, M. (2009). Agenda setting. Praha: Portál.
  • [19] McQuail, D. (2009). Úvod do teorie masové komunikace. Praha: Portál.
  • [20] Palovičová, Z. (2007). Normatívnosť pojmu uznania. Filozofia 62 (8), 658–667.
  • [21] Pogge, T. (2002). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • [22] Pravdová, H. (2009). Determinanty kreovania mediálnej kultúry. Trnava: Fakulta masmediálnej komunikácie UCM (Faculty of Mass Media Communication, UCM).
  • [23] Pravdová, H., & Radošinská, J. (2013). Media culture in the context of transformation of contemporary spiritual values and spirituality. European Journal of Science and Theology, 9(6), 169–78.
  • [24] Radošinská, J., & Višňovská, J. (2013). Aktuálne trendy v mediálnej kultúre. Trnava: Fakulta masmediálnej komunikácie UCM (Faculty of Mass Media Communication, UCM).
  • [25] Remišová, A. (2010). Etika médií. Bratislava: Kalligram.
  • [26] Solík, M., Višňovská, J., & Laluhová, J. (2013). Media as a tool for fostering values in the contemporary society. European Journal of Science and Theology, 9(6), 71–77
  • [27] Solík, M. (2010). Komunikácia v spoločenskom kontexte - uznanie ako intersubjektívny predpoklad. Communication Today, 1(2), 41–57.
  • [28] Solík, M. (2013). Problém uznania a jeho ukotvenie u Mareka Hrubca. Studia Politica Slovaca 6 (1), 98–106.
  • [29] Solík, M. (2014). K problematike kultúrneho uznania Charlesa Taylora. Filosofický časopis, 62(2), 203–216.
  • [30] Taylor, Ch. (1989). Sources of the self. The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • [31] Thompson, J. B. (2004). Média a modernita. Praha: Karolinum.
  • [32] Trampota, T. (2006). Zpravodajství. Praha: Portál.
  • [33] Trampota, T., & Vojtěchovská, M. (2010). Metody výzkumu médií. Praha: Portál.
  • [34] Young, I. M. (2008). Odpovědnost a globální spravedlnost: model odpovědnosti zaloŽené na sociálních vztazích. In M. Hrubec et al. Sociální kritika v éře globalizace. Praha: FILOSOFIA.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_s13374-014-0243-8
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.