The 'Underclass' Debate – A Discourse that Maligns People Living in Poverty

• Authors: Hans-Peter Michels
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The concept of an ‘underclass’ originates in the United States and is wide-spread in political and social science discourse today. Its power is most visible in discussions about deep cuts to social safety nets. The foundation of this discourse is the assigning of negative character traits and behaviours to poor people. This promotes the claim that they have brought negative consequences upon themselves and furthers the idea that poor people are personally responsible for their poverty. Discussion about an ‘underclass’ must be understood in the larger context of a comprehensive neoliberal ideological transformation, or ‘Newspeak’. Newspeak is implicitly based on the schema of a game in which everyone has the same chances, but which inevitably results in winners and losers.

Keywords

EN

Underclass Neoliberal ideological transformation Social inequality Poverty Charles Murray Stigmatisation of the poor

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Social Change Review
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 11
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 45-57

Dates

published

2013-07-01

online

2013-08-15

Contributors

author

Hans-Peter Michels

• Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus-Senftenberg (BTU CS), Fakultät für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Musikpädagogik, 47 Lipezker Str., 03048 Cottbus, Germany

References

• Andreß, Hans-Jürgen (ed.). 1998. Empirical Poverty Research in a ComparativePerspective. Aldershot: Avebury.
• Auletta, Ken. 1981a. ”A Reporter at Large I. The underclass.” New Yorker, November 16. Accessed April 28, 2013, http://www.newyorker.com/archive/1981/11/16/1981_11_16_063_TNY_CARDS_000334768.
• Auletta, Ken. 1981b. ”A Reporter at Large II. The underclass.” New Yorker, November 23. Accessed April 28, 2013, http://www.newyorker.com/archive/1981/11/23/1981_11_23_072_TNY_CARDS_000334871.
• Auletta, Ken. 1981c. ”A Reporter at Large III. The underclass.” New Yorker, November 30. Accessed December 23, 2012, http://www.newyorker.com/archive/1981/11/30/1981_11_30_101_TNY_CARDS_000336849.
• Auletta, Ken. 1982. The Underclass. New York: Random House.
• Banfield, Edward C. 1974 [1968]. The Unheavenly City Revisited: A Revision ofthe Unheavenly City. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
• Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc Wacquant. 2001. ”Neoliberal newspeak: notes on the new planetary vulgate.” Radical Philosophy 105: 2-5.
• Brenner, Robert. 2006. The Economics of Global Turbulence: The AdvancedCapitalist Economies from Long Boom to Long Downturn, 1945-2005. London and New York: Verso.
• Cameron, David. 2011. London riots: David Cameron's speech in full. Published on August 9. Accessed December 29, 2012, http://www.scotsman.com/news/london-riots-david-cameron-s-speech-in-full-1-1794077.
• Gans, Herbert J. 1995. The War against the poor. The underclass and antipovertypolicy. New York: Basic Books.
• Gehrmann Gerd and Klaus D. Müller. 2010. Aktivierende Soziale Arbeit mitnicht-motivierten Klienten. Mit Arbeitshilfen für Ausbildung und Praxis(Third Edition). Berlin: Walhalla Fachverlag.
• Kronauer, Martin 2010. Exklusion. Die Gefährdung des Sozialen im hochentwickelten Kapitalismus. Frankfurt: Campus.
• MacDonald, Robert. 1997. Youth, the 'underclass' and social exclusion. London: Routledge.
• Murray, Charles A. 1984. Losing Ground: American Social Policy 1950-1980. New York: Basic Books.
• Murray, Charles A. 1990. The Emerging British Underclass. London: Institute of Economic Affairs Health and Welfare Unit. Accessed December 27, 2012. <http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/cw33.pdf>
• Murray, Charles A. 1994. Underclass: The Crisis Deepens. London: Institute of Economic Affairs Health and Welfare Unit. Accessed December 27, 2012. <http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/cw33.pdf>
• Murray, Charles A. 2012. Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010. New York: The Crown Publishing Group.
• Myrdal, Gunnar. 1962. Challenge to Affluence. New York: Pantheon Books.
• Nolte, Paul. 2004. Generation Reform. Jenseits der blockierten Republik. München: C.H. Beck.
• Office of Policy Planning and Research, United States Department of Labor. 1965. The Negro Family: The Case For National Action. Accessed 22, December, 2012, http://www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/history/webid-meynihan.htm#.UOiTLXnCB-Q.
• Paugam, Serge. 1994. La disqualification sociale. Essai sur la nouvelle pauvreté. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
• Projekt Ideologie Theorie (PIT). 1979. Theorien über Ideologie. ArgumentSonderband AS 40. Berlin: Argument Verlag.
• Wacquant, Loïc. 1996. ”L'Underclass urbaine dans l'imaginaire social et scientique américain.” In L'Exclusion: l'état des savoirs, edited by Serge Paugam, 248-262. Paris: Editions La Découverte.
• Wacquant, Loïc. 2004. ”Decivilizing and demonizing: the remaking of the black America ghetto.” In The Sociology of Norbert Elias, edited by Steven Loyal and Stephen Quilley, 95-121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/scr-2013-0004