PL EN


2013 | 11 | 2 | 137-152
Article title

The Function of Communication in Faculty Management

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This research intends to explain the nature of communication and its strategic role from the perspective of faculty deans. In other words, the aim of the research is to analyze the perspectives of faculty deans on communication and its strategic functional role in the organization. The research theme is clarified by three subquestions: What is the function of communication in the organizations from the perspectives of deans? What are the principal advantages and disadvantages of the communication function in the organizations? Lastly, how does the faculty dean perceive himself/herself as a communicator in the management of the organization? Qualitative approach is applied through ten semistructured interviews of faculty deans in the university. The research findings reveal that the nature and functions of communication in the organization are important and are perceived as a vital element of university management. Moreover, the function of communication is confirmed as a key element to success in the strategic plans and in the organizational context of universities.
Publisher
Year
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
137-152
Physical description
Dates
published
2013-12-01
online
2014-02-14
Contributors
  • Ege University, Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Sciences, Izmir, Turkey
author
  • Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Sciences, Çanakkale, Turkey
References
  • Aberg, Leif. 1990. “Theoretical model and praxis of total communications”. International Public Relations Review 13 (2): 13-16.
  • Atwater, Leanne E. and David A. Waldman. 2008. Leadership, feedback and the open communication gap. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Barrett, J. Deborah. 2006. “Leadership Communication: A Communication Approach for Senior-Level Managers”. Handbook of Business Strategy 7 (1): 385-390.
  • Barrett, J. Deborah. 2002. “Change communication: using strategic employee communication to facilitate major change.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal 7 (4): 219-231.
  • Blazenaite, Aukse. 2011. “Effective Organizational Communication: in Search of a System.” Social Sciences 4 (74): 84-101.
  • Daft, Richard L. and Karl E. Weick. 1984. “Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems.” Academy of Management Review 9 (2): 284-295.
  • Eccles, Robert G. and Nitin Nohria. 1991. Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Eisenberg, Eric M. 1984. “Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication.” Communication Monographs 51: 227-242.[Crossref]
  • Fern, Edward F. 2001. Advanced focus group research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
  • Fisher, B. Aubrey. 1978. Perspectives on human communication. New York: Macmillan.
  • Gratz, Robert D., and Philip. J. Salem. 1981. Orgunizational Communication and Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Jensen, Maria. T. 2003.“Organizational Communication - a review.” Research and Development Report (1): 1-106.
  • Krone, Kathleen J., Fredric M. Jablin and Linda L. Putnam. 1987. “Communication theory and organizational communication: Multiple perspectives.” In Handbook of Organizational Communication edited by Fred M. Jablin, Linda L. Putnam, Karlene H. Roberts and Lyman W. Porter. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  • Lunenburg, Fred C. and Allan O. Ornstein. 2008. Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage.
  • Mintzberg, Henry. 1973. The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Richmond, Virginia P., and James C. McCroskey. 2009. Organizational communication for survival: making work. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
  • Silverman, David. 2001. Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
  • Steyn, Butch. 2000. “Model for developing corporate communication strategy.” Communicare 19 (2): 1-33.
  • Tucker, Mary L., Gregory D. Meyer, and James W. Westerman. 1996. “Organizational Communication: Development of internal strategic competitive advantage.” The Journal of Business Communication 33 (1): 51-69. [Crossref]
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_scr-2013-0019
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.