INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF EDUCATION

• Authors: David G. Hebert
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Imperfections - such as inequality and inefficiency of learning - are perennial problems for education despite a diversity of foundations on which national systems are established, which range from the idealistic vision of fostering a utopian society to the utilitarian objective of producing skilled workers capable of engendering economic growth. Despite sharing many common conditions and fundamental values, educators rarely learn valuable lessons from the successes and failures of highly relevant initiatives in distant nations. This problem may be attributed to several factors, not the least of which includes the entrenchment of local traditions and ethnocentric assumptions, but surely the quality and relevance of international-comparative research - and the way its results are disseminated - are issues that must also be taken into careful consideration. What are the unique lessons to be learned from international comparisons, and what are the prospective risks for how such comparisons may be misinterpreted and misused in educational settings? How can international comparative research be made more relevant, with tangible applications that may be recognized and effectively used by school teachers? How can international comparative education meaningfully examine subjects beyond the reach of standardized testing, in such domains as the fostering of creativity, talent, and ethical sensibilities, for example? These themes will be presented through discussion of both research findings and anecdotes from the personal experience of working for universities on four continents. Specific topics will include the challenges of accounting for conceptual equivalency and representing cultural differences, sampling and generalizability, reconciling the diverging aims of economic, anthropological, sociological, and psychological research, as well as grappling with the ambivalent discourse of globalization, multiculturalism, post-colonialism, and other social movements.

Keywords

EN

international education; comparative education; educational policy; evaluation; educational philosophy; research methodologies; globalization; multiculturalism; postcolonialism; indigenous epistemologies; democracy; social justice

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Signum Temporis
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 17-27

Dates

published

2012-12-01

online

2014-03-25

Contributors

author

David G. Hebert

• Faculty of Education Bergen University College Address: Post 7030, Bergen 5020, Norway Phone: [phone]

References

• Banks, J. A. (Ed.). (2009). Routledge international companion to multicultural education. London: Routledge.
• Blackburn, R. M. (2008). What is social inequality? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28 (7/8), 250-259.
• Bray, M. (2011). The small states paradigm and its evolution. In M. Martin, & M. Bray (Eds.), Tertiary education in small states: Planning in the context of globalization (pp. 37-72). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
• Bray, M., & Packer, S. (1993). Education in small nations: Concepts, challenges, and strategies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
• Burke, P. (2005). History and social theory (2nd ed.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
• Carey, H. F., & Raciborski, R. (2004). Postcolonialism: A valid paradigm for the former Sovietized states and Yugoslavia? East European Politics and Societies, 18 (2), 191-235.[Crossref]
• Crossley, M., Bray, M., & Packer, S. (2011). Education in small states: Policies and priorities. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
• Crossley, M., & Tikly, L. (2004). Postcolonial perspectives and comparative and international research in education: A critical introduction. Comparative Education, 40 (2). Special Issue 28: Postcolonialism and Comparative Education, 146-156.
• Finney, P. (2008). Hayden White, international history and questions too seldom posed. Rethinking History, 12 (1), 103-123.[Crossref][WoS]
• Golubeva, M., & Austers, I. (2011). Alternative civil enculturation: Political disenchantment and civic attitudes in minority schools in Estonia, Latvia, and Slovakia. European Education, 42 (4), 49-68.
• Grant, C. (2008). Challenging the myths about multicultural education. In C. A. Grant & T. K. Chapman (Eds.), History of Multicultural Education, volume II: Foundations and Stratifications (pp. 316-325). London: Routledge.
• Hebert, D. G. (2012). Wind bands and cultural identity in Japanese schools. Dordrecht and New York: Springer.
• Hebert, D. G. (2010). Ethnicity and music education: Sociological dimensions. In R. Wright (Ed.), Sociology and Music Education (pp. 93-114). Aldershot: Ashgate Press.
• Hebert, D. G., & Karlsen, S. (2010). Editorial introduction: Multiculturalism and music education. Finnish Journal of Music Education, 13 (1), 6-11.
• Hebert, D. G., & Kertz-Welzel, A. (Eds.). (2012). Patriotism and nationalism in music education. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.
• Heimonen, M., & Hebert, D. G. (2010). Pluralism and minority rights in music education: Implications of the legal and social philosophical dimensions. Visions of Research in Music Education, 15. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from http://users.rider.edu/~vrme/
• Hogan-Brun, G. (2006). At the interface of language ideology and practice: The public discourse surrounding the 2004 education reform in Latvia. Language Policy, 5, 313-333.
• Inda, J. X. & Rosaldo, R. (Eds.). (2002). The anthropology of globalization: A reader. London: Wiley- Blackwell.[WoS]
• Khan Academy. (n. d.). Khan Academy: Learn almost everything for free. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from http://www.khanacademy.org
• Koke, T. (2008). Higher education for the development of Latvia. Signum Temporis: Journal of Research in Pedagogy and Psychology, 1 (1), 4-9.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Gonzalez, E. M. (2008). The search for emerging decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: Further strategies for liberator and democratic inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 14 (5), 784-805.[WoS][Crossref]
• Martin, M. (2011). Meeting social demand for quantity and quality. In M. Martin, & M. Bray, (Eds.), Tertiary education in small states: Planning in the context of globalization (pp. 73-100). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
• May, S. & Aikman, S. (2003). Indigenous education: Addressing current issues and developments. Comparative Education, 39 (2). Special Issue 27: Indigenous Education: New Possibilities, Ongoing Constraints, 139-145.[Crossref]
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Schriewer, J. (2006). Comparative social science: Characteristic problems and changing problem solutions. Comparative Education, 42 (3). Special Issue 3: Comparative Methodologies in the Social Sciences: Cross-Disciplinary Inspirations, 299-336.
• Suoranta J. & Vaden, T. (2010). Wikiworld. New York: Pluto Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/sigtem-2012-0053