Literacy of Young Adults Learning at Adult Gymnasiums: Literacy or Illiteracy?

• Authors: Ene Varik
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article based on the sociocultural approach to literacy (Barton & Hamilton 1998, Barton 2007, Eames 2006, Gee 2012). The literacy has to do with reading, whereas multiple abilities to “read” certain types of texts in certain ways or at certain levels are used. This allows to claim that in that area various types of abilities are needed depending on the type of literacy and there is a set of literacy practices (Gee 2012, 40). Based on sociocultural approach conducted in 2007 the survey Literacy level of students of adult gymnasiums. The survey focuses on the analysis of literacy of young adults learning at adult gymnasiums in Estonia. The main research question was: how do young adults who learn at adult gymnasiums assess their coping with literacy-related activities and what are their skills in reading texts with different degrees of difficulty? The survey revealed that the majority of young adults who had had reading difficulties during childhood also experienced reading difficulties as adults. Significant proportion of young adults learning at adult gymnasiums had difficulties with finding necessary information in written texts and using this information.

Keywords

EN

adult literacy; reading difficulty; literacy research

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Studies for the Learning Society
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 1-2
• Pages: 13-19

Dates

online

2015-02-05

Contributors

author

Ene Varik

• Department of Special and Social Pedagogy, Institute of Educational Sciences, Tallinn University, Estonia

References

• Au, K.H. & Raphael, T.E. (2000). Equity and literacy in next millennium. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 170-188.[Crossref]
• Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local Literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
• Commission of the European Communities (2008). Progress toward the Lisbon Objectives in Education and Training. Indicators and benchmarks. Commission Staff Working Document. [ 15.07.2008 ] http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/progressreport_en.html
• Cunningham, J. W. (2000). Snippets: How will literacy be defined? Reading Research Quarterly, 35 (I), 49-50.[Crossref]
• Dillon, D.R., O`Brien, D.G. & Heilman, E.E. (2000). Literacy research in next millennium: From paradigms to pragmatism and practicality. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 10-26.[Crossref]
• Eames, F. H. (2006). Changing Definitions and Concepts of Literacy: Implication for Pedagogy and Research. In G. Reid & J. Wearmouth (Eds.) Dyslexia and Literacy. Theory and Practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, LDT, 327-341.
• Education & Training 2010 [ 15.09.2009] http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri= OJ:C:2004:104:0001:0019:EN:PDF
• Gee, J. P. (2012). Social Linguistics and Literacies. London & New York: Routledge.
• Gee, J. P. & Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. London: Routledge.
• Jansen, M. (1997). Reading disability and its treatment. Ericson, B. & Rönnberg, J. (Eds.). Reading disability and its treatment. Läspedagogiska Institutet EMIR.
• Linde, A. (2006). Illiteracy and literacy programmes in Germany: Not a topic for adult education? [02.02.2006] http://www.statvoks.no/forward / index_articles.htm
• Must, O., Must, A., & Raudik, V. (2001). Lugemiskirjaoskus [Reading Literacy]. Akadeemia, 7, 1431-1437.
• National Centre for Education Statistic (1997). Adult Literacy: An International Prespective. Working Paper No. 97-33. U. S. Department of Education. [17.07.2006 ]. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/9733.pdf
• Parsons, S. & Bynner, J. (2002). Basic Skills and Social Exclusion. London: Basic Skills Agency.
• Payne, G. (2009). Re- counting “Illiteracy”: Literacy Skills in the Sociology of Social Inequality. In Ed. J. Soler, F. Fletcher- Cambell, & G. Reid. Understanding Difficulties in Literacy Development. Los Angeles: Sage, 115-132.
• The Literacy Dictionary. The Vocabulary of Reading and Writing. (1995). Harris, T.L. & Hodges, R.E. (Eds). International Reading Association.
• Tire, G., Puksand, H., Henno, I. & Lepmann, T. (2010). PISA 2009-Eesti tulemused. Eesti 15-aastaste õpilaste teadmised ja oskused funktsionaalses lugemises, matemaatikas ja loodusteadustes [PISA 2009–Results in Estonia. Estonia’ s 15-yeaqrold pupils’ knowledge and skills in functional reading, mathematics and sciences]. Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium.
• UNESCO (1995). Basic Education in Prison. Institute for Education (UIE).
• UNESCO (2005). Education for All: Literacy for Life: EFA Global Monitoring Report 2006. Paris: UNESCO
• Varik, E. (2009). Erineva sotsiaalse tagapõhjaga noorte kirjaoskus [ Literacy of young people from different social backgrounds]. Haridus, 11-12/2009, 27-33.
• Verhoeven, L, Carsten E. & Reitsma, P. (2002). Precursors of Functional Literacy. [25.07.2008]. http://www.books.google.ee
• Verhoeven, L. & Vermeer, A. (2006). Sotsiocultural variation in literacy achievement. British Journal of educational Studies, 54, 189-211.
• Warschauer, M. (1997). A sociocultural approach to literacy and its significance for CALL. In K. Murphy-Judy & R. Sanders (Eds.), Nexus: The convergence of research & teaching through new information technologies. Durham: University of North Carolina, 88-97.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/sls-2013-0002