2014 | 49 | 1 | 77-102
Article title

English ‘-Ly’ Adverbs: from Subject Orientation to Conversion

Title variants
Languages of publication
Unlike subject-orientation in English ‘-ly’ adverbs, subject-relatedness does not conflate two syntactic functions in one and the same form: subject-related ‘-ly’ adverbs are predicative elements in the clause and do not function as adverbials. Therefore, the morphological make-up of subject-related ‘-ly’ adverbs does not match the syntactic function and the categorial meaning usually associated with the adverbial suffix ‘-ly’. In subject-relatedness, the association of the predicative function with the ‘-ly’ suffix differs from that of the well-known set of ‘-ly’ adjectives where the suffix is the present-day form of Old English ‘-līc’. Subject-relatedness raises the question of how these ‘-ly’ adverbs should be classified and the implications of this classification on their place in the system of word-classes. Specifically, it raises the question of the place of this morphological, syntactic and semantic behaviour with respect to word-class membership. In this respect, the paper explores the interpretation of subject-related ‘-ly’ words in frameworks where adjectives and adverbs are considered one and the same word-class and also where they are considered separate ones. The interpretation of subject-related ‘-ly’ words as belonging to the categorial space between adjective and adverb is relevant especially in respect of the morphosyntactic processes described in the literature for similar cases: although the profile of subject-related ‘-ly’ words appears to meet the conditions of conversion, they do not become lexicalized, as in lexical conversion, and cannot be traced back to a syntactic process, as in syntactic conversion
Physical description
  • University of Granada
  • Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic gradience. The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Adams, Valerie. 1973. An introduction to modern English word-formation. London: Longman.
  • Allerton, D.J. 1982. Valency and the English verb. New York: Academic Press.
  • Anward, Jan. 2001. Parts of speech. In: Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. Volume I, 726-735. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
  • Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical categories. Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 102.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bartra, Anna & Avellina Suñer. 1997. Inert agreement projections and the syntax of bare adjectives. Probus 9(1). 1-32.[Crossref]
  • Bauer, Laurie. 2005. Conversion and the notion of lexical category. In: Laurie Bauer & Salvador Valera (eds.), 19-30. Approaches to conversion/zero-derivation. Münster: Waxmann.
  • Bauer, Laurie. 2014. ‘What is the plural of mouse?’ and other unhelpful questions for morphologists. Plenary lecture delivered at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europea, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, 11th-14th September 2014.
  • Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Biese, Yrjöe M. 1941. Origin and development of conversions in English. (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae B XLV, 2.) Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago, Il.: Chicago University Press.
  • Díaz-Negrillo, Ana. 2014. Subject-relatedness in -ly premodifying adverbs. English Studies 95(4). 459-474.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Di Tullio, Ángela & Avellina Suñer. 2011. Adjetivos desnudos y sintagmas nominales sin determinación. In: María Victoria Escandell Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Cristina Sánchez López (eds.), 60 problemas de gramática. Homenaje a Ignacio Bosque, 158-162. Madrid: Akal.
  • Dixon, R.M.W. 1977. Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 1. 1-80.
  • Dokulil, Miloš. 1968. Zur Frage der Konversion und verwandter Wortbildungsvorgänge und -beziehungen. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 3. 215-239.
  • Farrell, Patrick. 2001. Functional shift as category underspecification. English Language and Linguistics 5(1). 109-130.
  • Giegerich, Heinz J. 2012. The morphology of -ly and the categorical status of ‘adverbs’ in English. English Language and Linguistics 16(3). 341-359.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Givón, Talmy. 1993. English grammar. A function-based introduction. Volume I. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Green, Georgia M. 1970. How abstract is surface structure? In: Mary Ann Campbell, James Lindholm, Alice Davison, William Fisher, Louanna Furbee, Julie Lovins, Edward Maxwell, John Reighard & Stephen Straight (eds.), Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting, 270-281. Chicago, Il.: Chicago Linguistic Society.
  • Guimier, Claude. 1985. On the origin of the suffix ‘-ly’. In: Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical semantics. Historical word-formation, 155-170. Berlin: Mouton.
  • Guimier, Claude. 1991. Sur l’adverbe orienté vers le sujet. In: Claude Guimier & Pierre Larcher Les états de l’adverbe. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
  • Heine, Berndt. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Parts of speech. In: Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder & Lars Kristoffersen (eds.), Layered structure in reference in a functional perspective: Papers from the Functional Grammar Conference in Copenhagen 1990, 29-55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Hengeveld, Kees, Jan Rijkhoff & Anna Siewierska. 2004. Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics 40(3). 527-570.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Hummel, Martin. 2000. Adverbale und adverbialisierte Adjektive im Spanischen. Konstruktionen des Typs Los niños duermen tranquilos und María corre rápido. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
  • Hummel, Martin. 2014. The adjective-adverb interface in Romance and English. In: Petra Sleeman, Freek Van de Velde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Adjectives in Germanic and Romance, 35-72 Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Jespersen, Otto. 1909-49. A modern English grammar on historical principles. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language, its nature, development and origin. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, Il.: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lipka, Leonhard. 1971. Grammatical categories, lexical items and word-formation. Foundations of Language 7. 211-238.
  • Luján, Marta. 1980. Sintaxis y semántica del adjetivo. Madrid: Cátedra.
  • Lyons, John. 1966. Towards a ‘notional’ theory of the ‘parts of speech’. Journal of Linguistics 2. 209-236.[Crossref]
  • Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of Present-Day English word-formation. München: C. Beck.
  • Matthews, P.H. 1980. Complex intransitive constructions. In: Sydney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik (eds.), Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk, 41-49. London: Longman.
  • Müller, Peter O., Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.). To appear. An international handbook of the languages of Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Neef, Martin. 1999. A declarative approach to conversion into verbs in German. In: Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1998, 199-242. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Nilsen, Øystein. 2003. Eliminating positions. Syntax and semantics of sentence modification. Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht.
  • Nist, John. 1966. A structural history of English. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Paul, Peter. 1982. Homonyms, semantic divergence and valency. Lingua 58(3-4). 291-307.[Crossref]
  • Payne, John, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2010. The distribution and category status of adjectives and adverbs. Word Structure 3. 31-81.
  • Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
  • Rauh, Gisa. 2010. Syntactic categories. Their identification and description in linguistic theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
  • Simpson, John A. (ed.). 2000-. Oxford English Dictionary online. Third edition. <>.
  • Sweet, Henry. 1891-98. A new English grammar. Logical and historical. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Tournier, Jean. 1985. Introduction descriptive à la lexicogènètique de l'Anglais contemporain. Genève: Editions Slaktine.
  • Valera, Salvador. 1996. Adjetivos y adverbios en inglés: La relación de homomorfia. Granada: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Granada.
  • Valera, Salvador. 1998. On subject-orientation in English ‘-ly’ adverbs. English Language and Linguistics 2(2). 263-282.
  • Valera, Salvador. 2014. Derivation by conversion. In: Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivation, 154-168. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.