Natural Phonology as Part of Natural Linguistics

• Authors: Wolfgang Dressler
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the history of phonology, no model of phonology (e.g. Trubetzkoy's model or Optimality Theory) has stayed for any considerable time alone on its own, i.e. without parallel models of syntax and morphology. Thus, Stampean Natural Phonology has been complemented in Europe by Natural Morphology, Natural Syntax and Natural Text Linguistics. In this way, Natural Phonology can be integrated into an overall model of Natural Linguistics. This model has been further unified by giving it the status of a preference theory and by providing functionalist epistemology and a semiotic metatheory for all of its parts, including Natural Phonology. This unity of Natural Linguistics is demonstrated with the universal preference parameters of figure vs. ground sharpening, binarity, iconicity, indexicality and the naturalness scale biuniqueness > uniqueness > ambiguity. The final argumentation focuses on the "weak claim" of universality of preferences (against the "strong claim" of innate phonological processes) by understanding universal preferences (including phonological processes) as plausible constructivist "software" strategies which are constructed in language acquisition for overcoming universal innate "hardware" problems.

Keywords

EN

Natural Phonology; Natural Linguistics; semiotics; preference theory; weak constructivist claim on universality

• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Journal: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 45
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 33-42

Dates

published

2009-03-01

online

2009-05-14

Contributors

author

Wolfgang Dressler

• Vienna University and Austrian Academy of Sciences

References

• Auer, P. 1990. "A note on prosody in Natural Phonology". In: Méndez Dosuna, J. and C. Pensado (eds.), Naturalists at Krems. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. 11-22.
• Botha, R. 1984. "A Galilean analysis of Afrikaans reduplication". Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 13.
• Cavalcante A.E. 1989. "Self-organizing processes in the acquisition of phonology". Revue de Phonétique Appliquée 91-93. 131-145.
• Churma, D.G. 1985. Arguments from external evidence in phonology. New York: Garland.
• De Lacy, P. 2006. Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Dogil, G. and H.C. Luschützky. 1991. "Notes on sonority and segmental strength". Rivista di Linguistica 2. 3-54.
• Donegan, P.J. 1978. "On the natural phonology of vowels". Working Papers in Linguistics, The Ohio State University 23.
• Donegan, P.J. 1985. "How learnable is phonology?" In: Dressler, W. and L. Tonelli (eds.), Papers on natural phonology from Eisenstadt. Padova, Italy: CLESP (Cooperativa Libraria Editoriale Studentesca Patavina). 19-31.
• Donegan, P.J. and D. Stampe. 1979. "The study of Natural Phonology". In: Dinnsen, D. (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 126-173.
• Dressler, W.U. 1984. "Explaining Natural Phonology". Phonology Yearbook 1. 29-51.
• Dressler, W.U. 1985. Morphonology. Ann Arbor: Karoma Press.
• Dressler, W.U. 1988. "A linguistic classification of phonological paraphasias". In: Dressler, W.U. and J. Stark (eds.), Linguistic analyses of aphasic language. New York: Springer. 1-22.
• Dressler, W.U. 1989a. Semiotische Parameter einer textlinguistischen Natürlichkeitstheorie. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
• Dressler, W.U. 1989b "Markedness and naturalness in phonology: The case of natural phonology". In: Tomic, M. (ed.), Markedness in synchrony and diachrony. Berlin: de Gruyter. 109-119
• Dressler, W.U. 1990a. "The cognitive perspective of ‘naturalist’ linguistic models". Cognitive Linguistics 1. 75-98.
• Dressler, W.U. 1990b. "Marked and unmarked translation: An approach from semiotically based Natural Text Linguistics". Meta 35. 138-148.
• Dressler, W.U. 1996a. "Principles of naturalness in phonology and across components". In: Hurch, B. and R. Rhodes (eds.). 41-51.
• Dressler, W.U. 1996b. "Parallelisms between Natural Textlinguistics and other components of Natural Linguistics". Sprachtypologie und Universalien-Forschung 49. 295-311.
• Dressler, W.U. 1996c. "A functionalist semiotic model of morphonology". In: Singh, R. (ed.), Trubetzkoy's orphan. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 67-83.
• Dressler, W.U. 1997. "‘Scenario’ as a concept for the functional explanation of language change". In: Gvozdanović, J. (ed.), Language change and functional explanations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 109-142.
• Dressler, W.U. 2002. "Naturalness and functionalism". In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. and J. Weckwerth (eds.), Future challenges for Natural Linguistics. München: Lincom Europa. 83-101.
• Dressler, W.U. 2003. "Naturalness and morphological change". In: Joseph, B.D. and R.D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 461-471.
• Dressler, W.U., W. Mayerthaler, W. Wurzel and O. Panagl. 1987. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Dressler, W.U. and S. Moosmüller. 1991. "Phonetics and phonology: A sociopsycholinguistic framework". Phonetica 48. 135-148.
• Dressler, W.U. and R. Wodak. 1982. "Sociophonological methods in the study of sociolinguistic variation in Viennese German". Language in Society 11. 339-370.
• Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 2002. "Challenges for Natural Linguistics in the twenty-first century: A personal view". In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. and J. Weckwerth (eds.), Future challenges for Natural Linguistics. München: Lincom Europa. 103-128.
• Hurch, B. 1988. "On the notion ‘latent process’". In: Bertinetto, P.M. and M. Loporcaro (eds.), Certamen Phonologicum I. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier. 103-115.
• Hurch, B. and R.A. Rhodes (eds.). 1996. Natural Phonology: The state of the art. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Karpf, A. 1990. "Selbstorganisationsprozesse in der sprachlichen Ontogenese: Erst- und Fremdsprache(n)". Tübingen: Narr.
• Kilani-Schoch, M. and W.U. Dressler. 2005. Morphologie naturelle et flexion du verbe français. Tübingen: Narr.
• Locke, J. 1983. Phonological acquisition and change. New York: Academic Press.
• Luschützky, H.C. 1988. "Sixteen possible types of natural phonological processes". Wiener Linguistische Gazette 42/43. 79-103.
• Madelska, L. and W.U. Dressler. 1996. "Postlexical stress processes and their segmental consequences illustrated in Polish and Czech". In: Hurch, B and R. Rhodes (eds.). 189-200.
• Mayerthaler, W. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
• Mayerthaler, W. 1982. "Markiertheit in der Phonologie". In: Vennemann, T. (ed.), Silben, Segmente, Akzente. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 205-246.
• Mayerthaler, W. and G. Fliedl. 1993. "Natürlichkeitstheoretische Syntax". In: Jacobs, J., A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax. Berlin: de Gruyter. 610-635.
• Mayerthaler, W., G. Fliedl and C. Winkler. 1998. Lexikon der natürlichkeitstheoretischen Syntax und Morphosyntax. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
• Merlini Barbaresi, L. 1988. Markedness in English Discourse: A semiotic approach. Parma: Zara.
• Morris, C.W. 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Noccetti, S., A. de Marco, L. Tonelli and W.U. Dressler. 2007. "The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Italian morphology". In: Savickienė, I. and W.U. Dressler (eds.), The acquisition of diminutives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 125-153.
• Orešnik, J. 2004. Naturalness in (morpho)syntax: English examples. Ljubljana: Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti.
• Peirce, C.S. 1965. Collected papers. (Ed. by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Prince, A. and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory. Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Seifert, K. 1985. Ikonizität von Pluralformen. Vienna: Dissertationen der Universität Wien.
• Singh, R. 1988. "Linguistic theory and external evidence". Canadian Journal of Linguistics 33(4). 329-511.
• Smoczyński, P. 1955. Przyswajanie przez dziecko podstaw systemu językowego [The acquisition of the fundamentals of the linguistic system by children]. Łódź: Ossolineum.
• Stampe, D. 1969. "The acquisition of phonetic representation". In: Binnick, R. et al. (eds.), Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 443-454.
• Stampe, D. 1979. A dissertation on natural phonology. New York: Garland.
• Vincke, J.L. 1989. "Binarism vs. multinarism: A theoretical choice or a natural hierarchy". Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Working Papers in Linguistics 5. 70-74.
• Wurzel, W.U. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10010-009-0003-9