Phonology, Naturalness and Universals

• Authors: Ian Maddieson
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper briefly surveys several conceptions of naturalness in phonology, touching primarily on typological frequency and the notion of "phonetic motivation". It is argued that typological frequency is not a reliable indicator of what is "phonetically motivated" as relative frequency patterns are the outcomes of more complex interactions, including non-phonetic factors. Phonetic motivations are diverse and include random variations, not only deterministic results, as is often desired. Models that view phonological patterns as emerging from complex interactions of a variety of natural factors are the most satisfying.

Keywords

EN

Phonology; naturalness; universals; phonetic motivation; emergence

• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Journal: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 45
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 131-140

Dates

published

2009-03-01

online

2009-05-14

Contributors

author

Ian Maddieson

• University of New Mexico

References

• Anderson, S.A. 1982. "Why phonology isn't ‘natural’". Linguistic Inquiry 12. 493-539.
• Archangeli, D. and D. Pulleyblank. 1994. Grounded phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Bach, E. and R.T. Harms. 1972. "How do languages get crazy rules?" In: Stockwell, R.P. and R. K.S. Macauley (eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1-21.
• Baxter, G., R. Blythe, W. Croft and A.J. McKane. 2006. "Utterance selection model of linguistic change". Physical Review E. 73. 046118.
• Blevins, J. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[WoS]
• Boersma, P. 1998. Functional phonology. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
• Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
• Cox, F. 1999. "Vowel change in Australian English". Phonetica 56. 1-27.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Cox, F. and S. Palethorpe. 2007. "An Illustration of the IPA: Australian English". Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37. 227-234.
• Dixon, R.M.W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Donegan, P. and D. Stampe. 1979. "The study of Natural Phonology". In: Dinnsen, D.A. (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 126-173.
• Dressler, W.U. 2004. "Naturalness and morphological change". In: Joseph, B.D. and R.D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 461-471.
• Goldstein, L.M. 1983. "Vowel shifts and articulatory-acoustic relations". In: Cohen, A. and M. P.R. van den Broecke (eds.), Abstracts of the 10th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. 267-273.
• Hayes, B. 1999. "Phonetically driven phonology: The role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding". In: Darnell, M., E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan and K. Wheatley (eds.), Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 243-285.
• Hayes, B. and D. Steriade. 2004. "Introduction. The phonetic bases of phonological markedness". In: Hayes, B., R. Kirchner, and D. Steriade (eds.), Phonetically-based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1-33.
• Householder, F.W. 1952. Review of Methods in structural linguistics by Z.S. Harris. International Journal of American Linguistics 18. 260-268.[Crossref]
• Hyman, L.M. 2001. "On the limits of phonetic determinism in phonology: NC revisted". In: Hume, B. and K. Johnson (eds), The role of perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press. 141-185.
• Kager, R. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kaun, A. 2004. "The typology of rounding harmony". In: Hayes, B., R. Kirchner and D. Steriade (eds.), Phonetically-based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 87-116.
• Lindblom, B. 1983. "Economy of speech gestures". In: MacNeilage, P.F. (ed.), The production of speech. New York: Springer. 217-245.
• Lindblom, B. 1986. "Phonetic universals in vowel systems". Ohala, J.J. and J.J. Jaeger (eds.), Experimental phonology. New York: Academic Press. 13-44.
• Lindblom, B. 2000. "Developmental origins of adult phonology: The interplay between phonetic emergents and the evolutionary adaptations of sound patterns". Phonetica 57. 297-314.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Maddieson, I. and P. Ladefoged. 1993. "Phonetics of partially nasal consonants". In: Huffman, M.K. and R.A. Krakow (eds.), Nasals, nasalization and the velum. San Diego: Academic Press. 251-301.
• McCarthy, J.J. 2002. A thematic guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Odden, D. 2005. Introducing phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ohala, J.J. 1974. "Phonetic explanation in phonology". In: Bruck, A., R. Fox, M. La Galy (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 251-274.
• Ohala, J.J. 1983. "The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints". In: MacNeilage, P.F. (ed.), The production of speech. New York: Springer. 189-216.
• Pater, J. 1999. "Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects". In: Kager, R., H. van der Hulst and W. Zonneveld (eds.), The prosody-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 310-343.
• Pater, J. 2001. "Austronesian nasal substitution revisited". In: Lombardi, L. (ed.), Segmental phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 159-182.
• Stampe, D. 1979. A dissertation on natural phonology. New York: Garland.
• Wells, J.C. 1982. "Accents of English". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Wright, R.A. 2003. "Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation". In: Local, J.K., R. Ogden, and R.A.M. Temple (eds.), Phonetic interpretation (Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 75-87.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10010-009-0010-x