Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It?

• Authors: Shimon Sapir , Monika Połczyńska , Yishai Tobin
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu.

Keywords

EN

Traumatic Brain Injury; speech acoustics; formant centralization; vowel space area

• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Journal: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 45
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 301-311

Dates

published

2009-06-01

online

2009-06-25

Contributors

author

Shimon Sapir

• University of Haifa

author

Monika Połczyńska

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

author

Yishai Tobin

• Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva

References

• Ansel, B. and R. Kent. 1992. "Acoustic-phonetic contrasts and intelligibility in the dysarthria associated with mixed cerebral palsy". Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35. 296-308.
• Blomgren, M., M. Robb and Y. Chen. 1998. "A note on vowel centralisation in stuttering and nonstuttering individuals". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 41. 1042-1051.
• Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2005. "Praat: Doing phonetics by computer". (Computer program, version 4.3.22.)
• Bunton, K. and G. Weismer. 2001. "The relationship between perception and acoustics for a high-low vowel contrast produced by speakers with dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 44. 1215-1228.
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power anlysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
• Ferguson, S. and D. Kewley-Port. 2007. "Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50. 1241-1255.[Crossref][WoS]
• Higgins, C. and M. Hodge. 2002. "Vowel area and intelligibility in children with and without dysarthria". Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 10. 271-277.
• Liu, H., F. Tsao and P. Kuhl. 2005. "The effect of reduced vowel working space on speech intelligibility in Mandarin-speaking young adults with cerebral palsy". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117. 3879-3889.
• McHenry, M. 2000. "Acoustic characteristics of voice after severe traumatic brain injury". Laryngoscope 100. 1156-1161.
• Moura, C., L. Cunha, H. Vilarinho and M. Cunha. 2008. "Voice parameters in children with Down syndrome". Journal of Voice 22. 34-42.[WoS]
• Nearey, T. 1989. "Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85. 2088-2113.
• Perkell, J. and W. Nelson. 1985. "Variability in production of the vowels /i/ and /a/". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77. 1889-1895.[WoS]
• Pisoni, D. 1981. "Variability of vowel formant frequencies and the quantal theory of speech: A first report". Phonetica 37. 285-305.
• Połczyńska-Fiszer M. 2006. First and second language dysarthria in TBI patients after prolonged coma. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.)
• Połczyńska-Fiszer, M. and A. Pufal. 2006. "Classification of dysarthria in Polish TBI patients using acoustic analysis". Acta Neuropsychologia 4. 257-285.
• Sapir, S., J. Spielman, L. Ramig, S. Hinds, S. Countryman, C. Fox and B. Story. 2003. "Effects of intensive voice treatment (the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment [LSVT]) on ataxic dysarthria: A case study". American Journal of Speech Lang Pathology 12. 387-399.
• Sapir, S., J. Spielman, L. Ramig, B. Story and C. Fox. 2007. "Effects of intensive voice treatment (the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment [LSVT]) on vowel articulation in dysarthric individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease: Acoustic and perceptual findings". Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 50. 899-912.[Crossref]
• Smiljanić, R. and A. Bradlow. 2005. "Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118. 1677-1688.[WoS]
• Strange, W. 1989. "Evolving theories of vowel perception". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85. 2081-2087.[WoS]
• Wang, Y., R. Kent, J. Duffy and J. Thomas. 2005. "Dysarthria in traumatic brain injury: A breath group and intonational analysis". Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 57. 59-89.
• Weismer, G., J-Y. Jeng, J. Laures, R. Kent and J. Kent. 2001. "Acoustic and intelligibility characteristics of sentence production in neurogenic speech disorders". Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 53. 1-18.
• Yunusova, Y., G. Weismer, J. Westbury and M. Lindstrom. 2008. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 51. 596-611.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2