Non-Teleological Approaches to Metathesis: Evidence from Dialects of Polish

• Authors: Bartłomiej Czaplicki
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper discusses metathesis and other related processes attested in the North Mazovian dialects of Polish. Recently proposed functional approaches to sound change provide a framework for this analysis. It is argued that the transposition of segments with elongated phonetic cues is best analyzed as an instance of phonetically-based sound change. Copying a consonant across a rhotic finds a similar perceptual explanation involving the reinterpretation of the acoustic signal. In addition to perceptual metathesis, I consider cases that fall under coarticulatory metathesis and arise from varying degrees of gestural overlap. In comparison to previous approaches to metathesis, the role of syllable structure in driving metathesis is considerably diminished but not refuted. Structural optimization presumably operates in tandem with phonetic and perceptual factors. Language processing is called to attention in accounting for the long-distance transposition of similar segments. A connectionist approach that makes reference to activation and competition in a neural network of linguistic units is invoked to define this type of metathesis. On the whole, the Polish dialectal data support the hypothesis that sound change is fundamentally diachronic and non-optimizing.

Keywords

EN

Metathesis; Polish; phonetically-based sound change; language processing; teleology

• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Journal: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 45
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 353-367

Dates

published

2009-09-01

online

2009-10-21

Contributors

author

Bartłomiej Czaplicki

• University of Warsaw

References

• Bethin, C.Y. 1998. Slavic prosody: Language change and phonological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Blevins, J. 2004. Evolutionary Phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[WoS]
• Blevins, J. and A. Garrett. 2004. "The evolution of metathesis". In: Hayes, B. et al. (eds.). 117-156.
• Boersma, P. 1998. Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.)
• Browman, C.P. and L. Goldstein. 1990. "Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech". In: Kingston, J. and M. Beckman (eds.). 341-376.
• Brückner, A. 1970. Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Wiedza Powszechna.
• Chitoran, I., L. Goldstein and D. Byrd. 2002. "Gestural overlap and recoverability: Articulatory evidence from Georgian". In: Gussenhoven, C. and N. Warner (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 419-447.
• Dell, G.S. 1986. "A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production". Psychological Review 93. 283-321.
• Eriksen, C., D. Schutze. 1978. "Temporal factors in visual information processing: A tutorial review". In: J. Requin (ed.), Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Friedrich, H. 1955. Gwara kurpiowska. Fonetyka. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Frisch, S. 2004. "Language processing and segmental OCP effects". In: Hayes, B. et al. (eds.). 346-371.
• Gouskova, M. 2004. "Relational hierarchies in Optimality Theory: The case of syllable contact". Phonology 21. 201-250.
• Hayes, B., R. Kirchner and D. Steriade (eds.). 2004. Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Heid, S. and S. Hawkins. 2000. "An acoustical study of long domain /r/ and /l/ coarticulation". Proceedings of the 5th Seminar on Speech Production: Models and Data, Munich. 77-80.
• Kenstowicz, M. 2005. "Paradigmatic uniformity and contrast". In: Downing, L., T.A. Hall and R. Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 145-169.
• Kingston, J. and M. Beckman (eds.). 1990. Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kiparsky, P. 2004. Universals constrain change; change results in typological generalizations. (Ms., Stanford University.)
• Ladefoged, P. 1975. A Course in Phonetics. (1st edition.) New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
• Lindau, M. 1978. "Vowel features". Language 54. 541-563.
• Miller, M.D. and D.G. MacKay. 1994. "Repetition deafness: Repeated words in computer-compressed speech are difficult to encode and recall". Psychological Science 5. 47-51.
• Ohala, J.J. 1974. "Experimental historical phonology". In: Anderson, J.M. and C. Jones (eds.), Historical linguistics II. Theory and description in phonology. Amsterdam: North Holland. 353-389.
• Ohala, J.J. 1981. "The listener as a source of sound change". In: Masek, C., R. Hendrick and M.F. Miller (eds.) Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 178-203.
• Prince, A. and P. Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Rose, S. and R. Walker. 2004. "A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence". Language 80. 475-531.
• Steriade, D. 1990. "Gestures and autosegments. Comments on Browman and Goldstein's paper". In: Kingston, J. and M. Beckman (eds.). 382-397.
• Tunley, A. 1999. Coarticulatory influences of liquids on vowels in English. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Cambridge University.)
• West, P. 1999. "The extent of coarticulation of English liquids: An acoustic and articulatory study". Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Berkeley. 1901-1904.
• Zduńska, H. 1965. Studia nad fonetyką gwar mazowieckich. Konsonantyzm. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10010-009-0020-8