Variation of Ergativity Patterns in Indo-Aryan

• Authors: Krzysztof Stroński
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Ergativity in the Indo-Aryan languages is a very intricate phenomenon. At the morphological level, we can observe a certain continuum, from disappearance of ergativity to its reinforcement. The first tendency is clearly visible not only in Eastern Hindi and Bihari dialects, but also in Western Rajasthani. The second tendency can be noted in the Pahari dialects. Somewhere in between are the Western Hindi dialects, which have introduced analytical marking for agent and patient. The transitional character of ergativity in Indo-Aryan can be observed in considering the alignment of the three syntactic-semantic Dixonian primitives, namely A, S, and O (Dixon 1979; 1994). It appears that, in fact, all possible alignments are traceable, even that in which A and O receive the same marking and which has been excluded by typologists (Comrie 1978). However, extending the Dixonian three-primitive system by Obi. (Klimov 1983), we can also observe that the same treatment of A and Obi. (perceived as one of the implications of ergativity) is shared by, for example, early Rajasthani, contemporary Pahari and Western Hindi, where it is closely connected with the polyfunctionality of the ergative postposition.

Keywords

EN

Ergativity; Indo-Aryan; morphosyntactic alignment

• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Journal: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 46
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 237-253

Dates

published

2010-06-01

online

2010-07-29

Contributors

author

Krzysztof Stroński

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

References

• Allen, W. S. 1960. "Notes on Rājasthānī verb". Indian Linguistics 21. 4-13.
• Anderson, S. R. 1977. "On the mechanisms by which languages become ergative". In: Li, C. N. (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press. 217-264.
• Bahl, K. 1972. On the present state of modern Rajasthani grammar. Jodhpur: Rajasthani Shodh Samsthan.
• Bhānāvat, N. and L. Kamal (eds.). 1997-1998. Rājasthānī gadya: Vikās aur prakāś [Rajasthani prose: development and publicity]. Āgrā: Śrīrām Mehrā end Kampanī. (R. G.)
• Bubenik, V. 1989. "An interpretation of split ergativity in Indo-Iranian languages". Diachronica 6(2). 181-212.[Crossref]
• Butt, M. 1993. "Conscious choice and some light verbs in Urdu". In: Verma, M. K. (ed.), Complex predicates in South Asian languages. New Delhi: Manohar Publishers and Distributors. 31-46.
• Butt, M. 1995. The structure of complex predicates in Urdu. Stanford: CLSI Publications.
• Butt, M. 2005. "The dative-ergative connection"
• Butt, M. and T. Holloway King (eds.). 2006. Proceedings of the LFG 06 conference. Universität Konstanz: CSLI Publications. <http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/11/lfg06.pdf>
• Cauhān, C. S. 2008. Kumāunī bhāsā ke abhilekh [The inscriptions of the Kumauni language]. Haldvānī: Ankit Prakāśan.
• Comrie, B. 1978. "Ergativity". In: Lehmann, W. P. (ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language. Texas: University of Texas Press. 323-393.
• Das, P. K. 2006. Grammatical agreement in Hindi-Urdu and its varieties. München: Lincom Europa.
• Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. "Ergativity". Language 55. 59-138.[Crossref]
• Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Grierson, G. A. 2005 [1916]. Linguistic survey of India. (Vol. IX, Part VI.) Delhi: Low Price Publications.
• Gusain, L. 2000. Bagri. München: Lincom Europa.
• Gusain, L. 2001. Shekhavati. München: Lincom Europa.
• Jha, S. 1985 [1958]. The formation of the Maithili language. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
• Joshi, M. P., 2009. "Advent of polities in Uttarkhand (Kumaon and Garhwal)". In: Lecomte-Tilouine, M. (ed.), Bards and mediums: History, culture, and politics in the Central Himalayan kingdoms. Almora: Shri Almora Book Depot. 327-371.
• Joshi, M. P. and V. S. Negi (eds.). 1994. "Was there a Central Pahari? An appraisal of Grierson's classification of three Pahari languages groups". In: Joshi, M. P., A. C. Fanger and C. W. Brown (eds.), Himalaya: past and present (Vol. III). Almora: Shree Almora Book Depot. 259-273.
• Juyal, G. 1973. Madhya pahārī bhāsā (garhvālī, kumāunī) kā anuśīlan aur uskā hindī se sambandh [The usage of Central Pahari language (Garhwali, Kumauni) and its connection with Hindi]. Lakhnau: Navayug Granthāgār.
• Khandelvāl, Ś. K. 1980. Bāãgarū bolī kā bhāsāśāstrīy adhyayan [A linguistic study of the Bangaru dialect]. Naī Dillī: Vānī Prakāśan.
• Khokhlova, L. V. 1992. "Trends in the development of ergativity in New Indo-Aryan". Osmania Papers in Linguistics 18. 71-89.
• Khokhlova, L. V. 2001. "Ergativity attrition in the history of Western New Indo-Aryan languages (Punjabi, Gujarati and Rajastahani)". The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics. 159-184.
• Khokhlova, L. V. 2006. "Sintaktičeskaja evolucija zapadnych novoindijskich jazykov v 15-20 vv. "[Syntactic evolution of Western New-Indo-Aryan languages from 15-20 c.]. In: Dybo, A. V., V. A. Dybo, O. A. Mudrak and G. S. Starostin (eds.), Aspekty komparativistiki [Aspects of comparative studies]. Moskva: Rosijskij Gosudarstvennyj Gumanitarnyj Universitet (Orientalia et Classica: Trudy Instituta Vostočnych Kultur i Antičnosti, Vypusk VIII). 151-186.
• Klaiman, M. H. 1987. "Mechanisms of ergativity in South Asia". Lingua 71. 61-102.[Crossref]
• Klimov, G. A. 1973. Očerk obsKčej teorii ergativnosti [An outline of the general theory of ergativity]. Moskva: Izdate'stvo Nauka.
• Klimov, G. A. 1983. Principy kontensivnoj tipologii [The principles of contensive typology]. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.
• Liperovskij, V. P. 1988. Očerk grammatiki sovremennogo bradzKa [An outline of the grammar of contemporary Braj]. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.
• Liperovskij, V. P. 1997. Očerk grammatiki sovremennogo avadhi [An outline of the grammar of contemporary Awadhi]. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.
• Magier, D. 1983. Topics in the grammar of Marwari. (Unpublished PhD disstertation, University of California, Berkeley.)
• Manning, C. D. 1996. Ergativity. Argument structure and grammatical relations. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
• Masica, C. P. 1979. "Aryan and non-Aryan elements in North Indian agriculture". In: Deshpande, M. M. and P. E. Hook (eds.), Aryan and Non-Aryan in India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Center for South Asian and Southeast Asian Studies. 55-151.
• MesKčaninov, I. I. 1967. Ergativnaja konstrukcija v jazykach različnych tipov [The ergative construction in languages of different types]. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.
• Montaut, A. 2004a. "Oblique main arguments in Hindi/Urdu as localizing predications". In: Bhaskararao, P. and K. V. Subbarao (eds.), Non-nominal Subjects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 33-56. Also available at <http://anniemontaut.free.fr/publications.htm>.
• Montaut, A. 2004b. A grammar of Hindi. München: Lincom Europa.
• Montaut, A. 2006. "The evolution of the tense-aspect system in Hindi/Urdu, and the status of the ergative alignment". In: Butt, M. and T. Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 06 conference. Universität Konstanz: CSLI Publications. 365-385.
• Pandharipande R. and Y. Kachru. 1977. "Relational grammar, ergativity and Hindi-Urdu" Lingua 41. 217-238.[Crossref]
• Pant, P. 2006. Kumāũnī lok kathā [Kumauni folk stories]. Almora: Manis Prakāśan.
• Payne, J. R. 1980. "The decay of ergativity in Pamir languages". Lingua 51. 147-186.[Crossref]
• Pirejko, L. A. 1968. Osnovnyje voprosy ergativnosti na materiale indoiranskich jazykov [Main questions pertaining to ergativity on the basis of lanaguage data from the Indo-Iranian languages]. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.
• Poudel, T. 2008. "Ergativity in Nepali: A historical perspective". Paper presented at the Workshop on Case and Alignment in Indo-European, University of Bergen, 10-11 December 2008.
• Saksena, B. 1952. Dakkhinī hindī [Dakkhini Hindi]. Ilāhābād: Tadan Printing Works.
• Saksena, B. 1971 [1937]. Evolution of Awadhi. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
• SKamatov, A. N. 1974. Klassičeskij dakxini [Classical Dakkhini]. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.
• SKarma, SK. 1964. Dakkhinī hindī kā udbhav aur vikās [The origin and development of Dakkhini Hindi]. Prayāg: Hindī Sāhitya Sammelan.
• Śarmā, K. 1991. Pūrvī rājasthānī: Udbhav aur vikās [Eastern Rajasthani: Origin and development]. Jaypur: The Students Book Company.
• Sharma, D. D. 1987. The formation of Kumauni language. Part II (Morphology and syntax). New Delhi: Bahri Publications.
• Sigorskij, A. A. 2000. "Ergativnaja konstrukcja i kategoria vida v jazyke chindi" [The ergative construction and the category of aspect in the Hindi language]. Filologičeskije Nauki, Sbornik Naučnych Trudov 2(17). Moskva: Moskovskij Gosudarstvennyj Institut MezKdunarodnych OdnosKenij (Universitet).
• Skalmowski, W. 1974. "Transitive verb constructions in the Pamir and Dardic languages". Studia Indoeuropejskie. Prace komisji Jězykoznawstawa 37. 205-212.
• Stroński, K. 2009. "On the origin and function of the ergative postposition in Hindi and its varieties". Rocznik Orientalistyczny 62(1). 175-186.
• Thākur, M. 1975. Pahārī bhāsā kuluī ke viśes sãdarbh me [The Pahari language with special reference to Kului]. Dillī: Sanmārg Prakāśan.
• Trask, L. R. 1979. "On the origin of ergativity". In: Plank, F. (ed.), Ergativity. Towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press. 385-404.
• Varma, S. 1936. "The Rudhārī dialect". Indian Linguistics 6. 128-196.
• Wallace, W. D. 1981. "Object-marking in the history of Nepali: A case of syntactic diffusion". Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 11(2). 107-128.
• Wallace, W. D. 1982. "The evolution of ergative syntax in Nepali". Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12(2). 147-211.
• Yadāv, Ś. L. (n.d.). "Ahīrvātī". In: Śārdā S. (ed.), n.d. Hariyānā kī upbhāsāe [The dialects of Haryana]. Candīgarh: Nideśak, Bhāsā Vibhāg, Hariyānā. (27444 Govt. Press, Chandigarh.) 193-269.
• Zakharyin, B. 1979. "On the formation of ergativity in Indo-Aryan and Dardic". Osmania Papers in Linguistics 5. 50-71.
• Zakharyin, B. 1982. "Problemy jazykovych kontaktov w indijskich Gimalajach" [Problems of languge contacts in Indian Himalayas]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta 13(3). 31-42.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10010-010-0012-8