Is There Compensatory Vowel Lengthening in the Language Acquisition of a Child with a Cochlear Implant

• Authors: Limor Adi-Bensaid , Yishai Tobin
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Compensatory vowel lengthening (CVL) is found in both adult and children's language. CVL is a process where the loss of a segment is compensated elsewhere by lengthening. It occurs mostly in languages with phonemic vowel length (de Chene and Anderson 1979). We examine CVL in the acquisition of Israeli Hebrew (IH), a language without phonemic vowel length, in a child with a cochlear implant (CI). Preliminary findings reveal: (1) a preference for the vowel /a/; (2) longer vowel duration before: (a) sonorant codas than obstruent codas; and (b) deleted sonorant codas than before preserved sonorant codas and open syllables. There is no significant difference in vowel duration before preserved and deleted obstruent codas and open syllables. We hypothesize that CVL appears in IH-speaking children but in sonorant codas only. The findings are discussed in terms of the representation of CVL in children's grammars as well as auditory deprivation, which may affect auditory perception and motor coordination.

Keywords

EN

Compensatory vowel lengthening; cochlear implant; coda deletion; moraic representation; motor coordination

• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Journal: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 46
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 255-274

Dates

published

2010-09-01

online

2010-09-22

Contributors

author

Limor Adi-Bensaid

• Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

author

Yishai Tobin

• Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

References

• Adam, G. 2002. From variable to optimal grammar: Evidence from language acquisition and language change. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Tel-Aviv University.)
• Adam, G. and O. Bat-El. 2007. "Segmental effects on syllable selection: Evidence from Hebrew". In: Gavarró, A. and M. J. Freitas (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 1-11.
• Adi-Bensaid, L. 2006. The prosodic development of Hebrew-speaking hearing impaired children. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Tel-Aviv University.)
• Adi-Bensaid, L. and O. Bat-El. 2004. "The development of the prosodic word in the speech of a hearing-impaired child with a cochlear implant device". Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 2. 187-206.
• Ben-David, A. 2001. Language acquisition and Phonological theory: Universal and variable processes across children and across languages. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Tel-Aviv University.) [In Hebrew.]
• Bennett, S. 1981. "Vowel formant frequency characteristics of preadolescent males and females". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67. 231-238.
• Bernhardt, B. H. and J. P. Stemberger. 1998. Handbook of phonological development from the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.
• Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2009. Praat. (Computer program.)
• Bolozky, S. and M. Becker. 2006. Living lexicon of Hebrew nouns. (Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.)
• Boothroyd, A. 1991. "Assessment of speech perception capacity in profoundly deaf children". American Journal of Otology 12. 67-72.
• Broselow, E., S. Chen and M. Huffman. 1997. "Syllable weight: convergence of phonology and phonetics". Phonology 14. 47-82.[Crossref]
• de Chene, B. and S. R. Anderson. 1979. "Compensatory lengthening". Language 55(3). 505-535.[Crossref]
• Demuth, K. and E. J. Fee. 1995. Minimal prosodic words in early phonological development. (Ms., Brown University and Dalhousie University.)
• Ertmer, D. J. 2001. "Emergence of a vowel system in a young cochlear implant recipient". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44. 803-813.[Crossref]
• Ertmer, D. J., K. I. Kirk, S. T. Sehgal, A. I. Riley and M. J. Osberger. 1997. "A comparison of vowel production by children with multichannel cochlear implants or tactile aids: Perceptual evidence". Ear and Hearing 18. 307-315.[Crossref]
• Ertmer, D. J., A. Young, K. Grohne, J. A. Mellon, C. Johnson, K. Corbett and K. Saindon. 2002. "Vocal development in young children with cochlear implants: Profiles and implications for intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 33. 184-195.[Crossref]
• Fee, E. J. 1995. "The phonological system of a specifically language-impaired population". Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 9(3). 189-209.[PubMed]
• Fikkert, P. 1994. On the acquisition of prosodic structure. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
• Geers, A. and C. Brenner. 1994. "Speech perception results: Audition and lipreading enhancement". Volta Review 96. 97-108.
• Goffman, L., D. J. Ertmer and C. Erdle. 2002. "Changes in speech production in a child with a cochlear implant: Acoustic and kinematic evidence". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45. 891-901.[Crossref]
• Gordon, M. 2002a. "A phonetically-driven account of syllable weight". Language 78. 51-80.[Crossref]
• Gordon, M. 2002b. "Weight-by-position adjunction and syllable structure". Lingua 112. 901-931.[Crossref]
• Gordon, M. 2005. "A perceptually-driven account of onset-sensitive stress". Natural Language and Linguistic theory 23. 595-653.
• Gordon, M. 2006. Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, typology. New York: Routledge.
• Gordon, M., C. Jany, C. Nash and N. Takara. 2008. "Vowel and consonant sonority and coda weight: A cross-linguistic study". In: Change, C. B. and H. J. Haynie (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 208-216.
• Grijzenhout, J. and S. Joppen. 1998. First step in the acquisition of German phonology: A case study. (Ms., Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf.)
• Hayes, B. 1986. "Inalterability in CV phonology". Language 62. 321-351.[Crossref]
• Hayes, B. 1989. "Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology". Linguistic Inquiry 20. 253-306.
• Higgins, M. B., E. A. McCleary and L. Schulte. 2001. "Articulatory changes with short-term deactivation of the cochlear implants of two prelingually deafened children". Ear and Hearing 22. 29-45.[Crossref]
• Hohepa, P. 1967. A profile generative grammar of Maori. (Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics, Memoir 20.) Baltimore: Waverly Press.
• Hubbard, K. 1994. Duration in moraic theory. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.)
• Hubbard, K. 1995. "‘Prenasalised consonants’ and syllable timing: Evidence from Runyambo and Luganda". Phonology 12. 235-256.[Crossref]
• Hyman, L. 1985. A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.
• Kappa, I. 2002. "On the acquisition of syllabic structure in Greek". Journal of Greek Linguistics 3. 1-52.
• Kehoe, M., and C. Lleó. 2003. "The acquisition of nuclei: A longitudinal analysis of phonological vowel length in three German-speaking children". Journal of Child Language 30. 527-556.[Crossref]
• Kehoe, M., and C. Stoel-Gammon. 2001. "Development of syllable structure in English speaking children with particular reference to rhymes". Journal of Child Language 28. 392-432.
• Kenstowicz, M. 1970. "On the notation of vowel length in Lithuanian". Papers in Linguistics 3. 73-113.
• Kent, R. D. and H. R. Bauer. 1985. "Vocalization of one-year-olds". Journal of Child Language, 12. 491-526.
• Klatt, D. H. 1976. "Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 59(5). 1208-1221.
• Ladefoged P. 2001. A course in phonetics. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
• Levelt, C. 1994. On the acquisition of place. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Institute of Generative Linguistics, Leiden.)
• Lowenstamm, J. and J. Kaye. 1986. "Compensatory lengthening in Tiberian Hebrew". In: Wetzels L. and E. Sezer (eds.), Studies in compensatory lengthening. (Publications in Language Sciences 23.) Dordrecht: Foris. 97-132.
• Maddieson, I. 1993. "Splitting the mora". UCLA Working papers in Phonetics 83. 9-18.
• Miyamoto, R. T., M. J. Osberger, A. M. Robbins, W. A. Myres and K. S. Kessler. 1993. "Prelingually deafened children's performance with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant". American Journal of Otology 14. 437-445.
• Most, T., O. Amir and Y. Tobin. 2000. "The Hebrew vowel system: Raw and normalized acoustic data". Language and Speech 43. 295-308.[Crossref]
• Nathani, S., D. K. Oller and A. B. Cobo-Lewis. 2003. "Final Syllable Lengthening (FSL) in infant vocalizations". Journal of Child Language 30. 3-25.[Crossref]
• Oller, D. K. 1973. "The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54. 1235-1247.
• Ota, M. 1999. Phonological theory and the acquisition of prosodic structure: Evidence from child Japanese. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Georgetown.)
• Ota, M. 2003. The development of prosodic structure in early words: Continuity, divergence and change. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Sezer, E. 1986. "An autosegmental analysis of compensatory lengthening in Turkish". In: Wetzels, L. and E. Sezer (eds.), Studies in compensatory lengthening. (Publications in Language Sciences 23.) Dordrecht: Foris. 227-250.
• Smit, A. B. 1993. "Phonological errors distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska articulation norms project: Word-initial consonant clusters". Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36. 931-947.
• Stemberger, J. 1992a. "A performance constraint on compensatory lengthening in child phonology". Language and Speech 35. 207-218.
• Stemberger, J. 1992b. "Vocalic underspecification in English language production". Language 68(3). 492-524.[Crossref]
• Svirsky, M. A., D. Jones, M. J. Osberger and R. T. Miyamoto. 1998. "The effect of auditory feedback on the control of oral-nasal balance by pediatric cochlear implant users". Ear and Hearing 19. 385-393.[Crossref]
• Tobey, E. A. and A. E. Geers. 1995. "Speech production benefits of cochlear implants". In: Uziel, A. S. and M. Mondain (eds.), Cochlear implants in children. Basel: Karger. 146-153.
• Tobey, E. A., A. E. Geers and C. Brenner. 1994. "Speech production results: Speech featureacquisition". Volta Review 96(5). 109-129.
• Tobin, Y. 1997. Phonology as human behavior: Theoretical implications and clinical applications. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Tobin, Y. 2002. "Phonology as human behavior: Theoretical implications and cognitive and clinical applications". In: Fava, E. (ed.), Linguistic theory, speech and language pathology, speech therapy. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 3-22.
• Tobin, Y. (ed.) 2009a. Special theme issue: Phonology as human behavior. (Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 12(2).)
• Tobin, Y. 2009b. "Modern Hebrew? (B) Contemporary Hebrew? (C) Israeli Hebrew? (D) Israeli?: Choose one of the above. Or: Is the glass half-empty or half-full? Or: Where do you draw the line of demarcation and why?" Iyunim be Safa ve-Hevra/Israel Studies of Language and Society 2(1). 137-144.
• Trubetzkoy, N. 1939. Principles of phonology. (Translated by Christiane A. M. Baltaxe.) Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Tye-Murray, N. and K. I. Kirk. 1993. "Vowel and diphthong production by young users of cochlear implants and the relationship between the Phone Level Evaluation and spontaneous speech". Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36. 488-502.
• Wetzels, L. 1986. "Phonological timing in Ancient Greek". In: Wetzels, L. and E. Sezer (eds.), Studies in compensatory lengthening. (Publications in Language Sciences 23.) Dordrecht: Foris. 279-344.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10010-010-0015-5