2010 | 46 | 4 | 429-456
Article title

Towards a Gradual Scale of Vowel Reduction: A Pilot Study

Selected contents from this journal
Title variants
Languages of publication
The study reports the results of an acoustic analysis of vowel reduction of the /i:/ vowel, considering all three traditionally explored aspects of vowel reduction, i.e. duration, F1 and F2 in read speech produced by 12 native speakers of English. Starting from the observation that the standard literature considers only duration as a proxy for overall reduction, the aim of the study is to verify whether duration, F1 and F2 exhibit reduction (construed as shortening of duration and centralization of formants, respectively) to the same degree. The r test reveals the lack of a robust linear correlation between duration, F1 and F2, the highest value being 0.51 (the correlation between duration and F1) and 0.24 (the correlation between duration and F2), neither of which is a strong correlation. In light of the results, the study seeks to establish a gradual scale of vowel reduction, combining the spatial and the temporal aspects by means of averaging the distances between the least and the most reduced tokens across duration, F1/F2 on an equal basis. The resulting degree is expressed on a scale of reduction, ranging from 0 (no reduction whatsoever) to 100 per cent (reduction to schwa).
Physical description
  • Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań
  • Amir, N. and O. Amir. 2007. "Novel measures for vowel reduction". Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken. 849-852.
  • Anderson, A. and B. Horwath. 2002. "Referential form and word medial duration in video-mediated and face-to-face dialogues". In: Bos, J., M. E. Foster, and C. Matheson (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (EDILOG 2002), Edinburgh. Edinburgh: Cognitive Science Centre, University of Edinburgh. 13-20.
  • Aylett, M. 2001. "Modelling care of articulation with HMMs is dangerous". EUROSPEECH-2001. 1491-1494.
  • Aylett, M. and A. Turk. 2006. "Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119. 3048-3058.
  • Aylett, M. and A. Turk. 2004. "The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence and duration in spontaneous speech". Language and Speech 47(1). 31-56.[Crossref]
  • Aylett, M. and A. Turk. 1998. "Vowel quality in spontaneous speech: What makes a good vowel?" Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Incorporating the 7th Australian International Speech Science and Technology Conference, Sydney. Sydney: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association (ASSTA).
  • Baker, R. E. and A. R. Bradlow. 2009. "Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style and prosody". Language and Speech 52. 391-413.[Crossref]
  • Barry, W. and B. Andreeva. 2001. "Cross-language similarities and differences in spontaneous speech patterns". Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31. 51-66.
  • Beckford Wassink, A., R. A. Wright and A. D. Franklin. 2007. "Intraspeaker variability in vowel production: On investigation of motherese, hyperspeech and Lombard speech in Jamaican speakers". Journal of Phonetics 35. 363-379.[Crossref]
  • Bell, A., J. Brenier, M. Gregory, C. Girand and D. Jurafsky. "Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English". Journal of Memory and Language 60(1). 92-111.
  • Bell, A., D. Jurafsky, E. Fossler-Lussier, C. Girand, M. Gregory and D. Gildea. 2003. "Effects of dislfuencies, predictability and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113. 1001-1024.
  • Bondarko, L. V., N. B. Volskaya, S. O. Tananaiko and L. A. Vasilieva. 2003. "Phonetic properties of Russian spontaneous speech". Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona. 2973-2976.
  • Bradlow, A. R., G. M. Torretta and D. B. Pisoni. 1996. "Intelligibility of normal speech. Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics". Speech Communication 20. 255-272.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Bybee, J. 2000. "Lexicalization of sound change and alternating environments". In: Broe, M. and J. Pierrehumbert (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 250-269.
  • Bybee, J. and J. Scheibman. 1999. "The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don't in English". Linguistics 37. 575-596.
  • Byrd, D. and C. C. Tan. 1996. "Saying consonants clusters quickly". Journal of Phonetics 24. 263-282.[Crossref]
  • Carlson, R., G. Fant and B. Granström. 1975. "Two-formant models, pitch and vowel perception". In: Fant, G. and M. A. A. Tatham (eds.), Auditory analysis and perception of speech. London: Academic Press. 55-82.
  • Clark, L. and G. Trousdale. 2009. "Exploring the role of token frequency in phonological change: Evidence from TH-Fronting in east-central Scotland". English Language and Linguistics 13. 33-55.
  • Corbin, O. 2003. "Phoneme deletion in spontaneous British English". Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona. 2813-2816.
  • Cruttenden, A. 2008. Gimson's pronunciation of English. (7th edition.) London: Hodder.
  • De Jong, G., K. McDougall, T. Hudson and F. Nolan. 2007. "The speaker discriminating power of sounds undergoing historical change: A formant-based study". Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, August 2007. 1813-1816.
  • Delattre, P. 1965/1981. "An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages". In: Malmberg, B.(ed.), Studies in comparative phonetics. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag. 63-94.
  • Duez, D. 2001. "Restoration of deleted and assimilated consonant sequences in conversational French: Effects of preceding and following context". Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31. 101-114.
  • Ellis, L. and W. Hardcastle. 1999. "An instrumental study of alveolar to velar assimilation in careful and fast speech". Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco. 2425-2428.
  • Ellis, L. and W. Hardcastle. 2002. "Categorical and gradient properties of assimilation in alveolar to velar sequences: Evidence from EPG and EMA". Journal of Phonetics 30. 373-396.[Crossref]
  • Engstrand, O. and D. Krull. 2002. "Duration of syllable-sized units in casual and elaborated speech: Cross-language observations on Swedish and Spanish". Proceedings from Fonetik 2002, the 14th Swedish Phonetics Conference, Stockholm. (Speech, Music and Hearing, Quarterly Progress and Status Report (TMH-QPSR) 44.) 69-72.
  • Fant, G., U. Stalhammer and I. Karlsson. 1974. "Swedish vowels in speech materials of various complexity". Speech Communication 2. 139-147.
  • Ferragne, E. and F. Pellegrino. 2010. "Formant frequencies of vowels in 13 accents of the British Isles". Journal of the International Phonetic Association 40. 1-34.
  • Fowler, C. and J. Housum. 1987. "Talkers signalling of new and old words in speech and listeners perception and use of the distinction". Journal of Memory and Language 26. 489-504.
  • Greenberg, S. and E. Fossler-Lussier. 2000. "The uninvited guest: Information's role in guiding the production of spontaneous speech". Proceedings of the CREST workshop on models of speech production: Motor planning and articulatory modeling. Kloster Seeon, Germany. 1-4.
  • Harris, J. 2005. "Vowel reduction as information loss". In: Carr, P., J. Durand and C. J. Ewen (eds.), Headhood, elements, specification and contrastivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 119-132.
  • Hillenbrand, J. M., L. A. Getty, M. J. Clark and K. Wheeler. 1995. "Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97. 3099-3111.
  • Hollmann, W. B. and A. Siewierska. 2006. "Corpora and (the need for) other methods in a study of Lancashire dialect". Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54. 203-216.
  • Hollmann, W. B. and A. Siewierska. 2007. "A construction grammar account of possessive constructions in Lancashire dialect: some advantages and challenges". English Language and Linguistics 11. 407-424.
  • Howes, D. 1967. "Equilibrium theory of word frequency distributions". Psychonometrics Bulletin 1. 1-18.
  • Jaworski, S. 2008. Lenition processes in English and other languages: A hierarchy of susceptibility to inertia. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.)
  • Joos, M. 1948. "Acoustic phonetics". Language 24. 1-136.
  • Jurafsky, D., A. Bell, E. Fossler-Lusier, C. Girana and W. Raymond. 1998. "Reduction of English Function words in SWITCHBOARD". Proceedings of ICLSP98. 3111-3114.
  • Kelly, J. and J. Local. 1989. Doing phonology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Koopmans-van Beinum, F. J. 1980. Vowel contrast reduction: An acoustic and perceptual study of Dutch vowels in various speech conditions. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.)
  • Lavoie, L. 2002. "Some influences on the realization of for and four in American English". Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32. 175-202.
  • Lennes, M, N. Alarotu and M. Vainio. 2001. "Is the phonetic quality of unaccented vowels predictable? An example from spontaneous Finnish". Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31. 127-138.
  • Lindblom, B. 1990. "Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory". In: Hardcastle, W. J. and A. Marchal, A. (eds.), Speech production and speech modeling. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 403-439.
  • Lindblom, B. 1963. "Spectrographic study of vowel reduction". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35. 1773-1781.
  • Local, J. 2003. "Variable domains and variable relevance: Interpreting phonetic exponents". Journal of Phonetics 31. 321-339.[Crossref]
  • Lodge, K. 1984. Studies in the phonology of colloquial English. London: Croom Helm.
  • Moon, S. J. and B. Lindblom. 1994. "Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96: 40-55.
  • Max, L and A. J. Caruso. 1997. "Acoustic measures of temporal intervals across speaking rates: Variability of syllable- and phrase-level relative timing". Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 40. 1097-1110.
  • Mitterer, H. and M. Ernestus. 2006. "Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch". Journal of Phonetics 34. 73-103.[Crossref]
  • Moon, S. J. and B. Lindblom. 1994. "Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96. 40-55.
  • Mooshammer, C. and C. Geng. 2008. "Acoustic and articulatory manifestations of vowel reduction in German". Journal of the International Phonetic Association 38(2). 119-136.
  • Munson, B. and N. P. Solomon. "The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47. 1048-1105.
  • Newman, R. S. and S. Evers. 2007. "The effect of talker familiarity on stream segregation". Journal of Phonetics 35. 85-103.[Crossref]
  • Ohala, J. and H. Kawasaki. 1984. "Prosodic phonology and phonetics". Phonology 1. 113-128.
  • Oktaba, W. 1966. Elementy statystyki matematycznej i metodyka doświadczalnictwa [Elements of mathematical statistics and research methodology]. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Picheny, M., N. Durlach and L. Braida. 1986. "Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech". Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 29. 434-445.
  • Piroth, H. G. and P. M. Janker. 2004. "Speaker-dependent differences in voicing and devoicing of German obstruents". Journal of Phonetics 32. 81-109.[Crossref]
  • Port, R. F. 1981. "Linguistic timing factors in combination". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69. 262-274.
  • Recasens, D. 2004. "The effect of syllable position on consonant reduction: Evidence from Catalan consonant clusters". Journal of Phonetics 32. 435-453.[Crossref]
  • Rosenhouse, J. and L. Kishon-Rabin. 2003. "The effect of speech rate and noise on bilinguals' speech perception: the case of native speakers of Arabic in Israel". EUROSPEECH-2003. 2089-2092.
  • Saltzman, E. 2003. "Temporal aspects of articulatory control". EUROSPEECH-2003. 2565-2568.
  • Sanford, D. 2008. "Metaphor and phonological reduction in English idiomatic expressions". Cognitive Linguistics 19. 585-603.
  • Shearme, J. N. and J. N. Holmes. 1962. "An experimental study of the classification of speech sounds according to their distribution in the formant 1-formant 2 plane". Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Helsinki. 234-240.
  • Shockey, L. 2003. Sound patterns of spoken English. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Shockey, L. 1974. "Phonetic and phonological properties of connected speech". Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 17. iv-143.
  • Silva, V. de, A. Iivonen, L. V. Bondarko and L. C. W. Pols. 2003. "Common and language dependent phonetic differences between read and spontaneous speech in Russian, Finnish and Dutch". Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona. 2977-2980.
  • Summers, W. V. 1987. "Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: Articulatory and acoustic analyses". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82(3). 847-863.
  • Tagliamonte, S.A and R. V. Roeder. 2009. "Variation in the English definite article: Sociohistorical linguistics in t'speech community". Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(4). 435-471.[Crossref]
  • Tiffany, W. R. 1959. "Non random sources of variation in vowel quality". Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 2. 305-317.
  • Van Bergem, D. R. 1993. "Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class". Speech Communication 12. 1-23.[Crossref]
  • Villafaña Dalcher, C. 2007. "Statistical methods for quantitative analysis of multiple lenition components". Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken. 857-860.
  • Wright, R. 2003. "Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation". In: Local, J., R. Ogden and R. Temple, R. (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 75-87.
  • Zhao, Y. and D. Jurafsky. 2009. "The effect of lexical frequency and Lombard reflex on tone hyperarticulation". Journal of Phonetics 27. 231-247.[Crossref]
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.