Performative Utterances: Seven Puzzles

• Authors: Robert Harnish
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

It was John Austin who introduced the word "performative" (which he called "a new and ugly word") into the philosophy of language and linguistics. His original idea was that there are utterances which are more correctly characterized as doing something rather than stating something. Austin wrote: "when I say ‘I do’ (sc. take this woman to be my lawful wedded wife), I am not reporting on a marriage, I am indulging in it." As is well known, Austin went on to work out this notion of a performative utterance (and of a performative expression) in a number of directions, but in the end the attempt to isolate performatives (doings) from constatives (true or false) failed dramatically, and the idea of viewing language use in terms of the performative-constative dichotomy gave way to the study of speech acts: "The total speech act in the total speech situation is the only actual phenomena which, in the last resort, we are engaged in elucidating." But giving up the performative-constative distinction does not mean giving up theorizing about performatives, and there is a cottage industry in the theory of language devoted to them. We identify seven puzzles for theorizing about performatives. We consider how Austin might have dealt with some of them. Finding his answers problematic, we then survey recent theories of performatives and zoom in on the major contenders, identifying one theory in particular for scrutiny and seeing how it fares with the seven puzzles. The upshot is that there is still work to be done understanding performatives.

Keywords

EN

Austin; constatives; language philosophy; performatives; performativity puzzles

• Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
• Journal: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
• Year: 2007
• Volume: 3
• Issue: -1
• Pages: 3-21

Dates

published

2007-01-01

online

2007-07-04

Contributors

author

Robert Harnish

• University of Arizona, Tucson

References

• Austin, John. "Performative utterances." In Philosophical Papers by John Austin. Oxford: OUP, 1961.
• Austin, John. Philosophical Papers. Oxford: OUP, 1961.
• Austin, John. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP, 1962.
• Bach, Kent. "Standardization vs conventionalization." Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1995): 677-686.[Crossref]
• Bach, Kent., and Robert M. Harnish. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979.
• Bach, Kent., and Robert M. Harnish. "How performatives really work: a reply to Searle." Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (1992): 93-110.[Crossref]
• Barwise, Jon and John Perry. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT, 1983.
• Cole, Peter and Jerry Morgan, eds. Syntax and Semantics 3. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
• Fodor, Jerry and Zenon Pylyshyn. "Connectionism and cognitive architecture." In Connections and Symbols, edited by Steven Pinker and Jacques Mehler, 78-102. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, 1988.
• Fraser, Bruce. "Hedged performatives." In Syntax and Semantics 3, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 44-68. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
• Gale, Richard. "Do performative utterances have any constative function?" Journal of Philosophy 5 (1970): 117-121.[Crossref]
• Ginet, Carl. "Performativity." Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1979): 245-265.[Crossref]
• Grewendorf, Gunter and Georg Meggle, eds. Speech Acts, Mind and Society. Boston: Kluver, 2002.
• Harnish, Robert M. "Two consequences of transparent subject position." Philosophical Studies 30 (1976): 11-18.[Crossref]
• Harnish, Robert M. "A projection problem for pragmatics." In Syntax and Semantics 9, edited by Frank Heny and Helmut Schnelle, 16-33. New York, Academic Press, 1979.
• Harnish, Robert M. "Performatives are default reflexive standardized indirect speech acts." Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38 (1988): 83-106.
• Harnish, Robert M. Review of Francois Recanati (1987), Meaning and Force, Cambridge: CUP. The Philosophical Review April 1991: 297-300.
• Harnish, Robert M. "Meaning and performatives." In Translation and Meaning, edited by Marcel Thelen and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 90-111. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Rijkshogeschool, 1991.
• Harnish, Robert M. "Communicating with proverbs." Communication and Cognition 26 (1993): 16-33.
• Harnish, Robert M., ed. Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1994.
• Harnish, Robert M. "Performatives and standardization: a progress report." Linguistische Berichte 8 (1997): 161-175.
• Harnish, Robert M. "Are performative utterances declarations?" In Speech Acts, Mind and Society, edited by Gunter Grewendorf and Georg Meggle, 55-76. Boston: Kluver, 2002.
• Harnish, Robert M. "Performatives as constatives vs declarations: some recent issues." In Seduction, Community, Speech: Festschrift for Herman Parret, edited by Frank Brisard, Michael Meeuwis and Bart Vandenabeele, 26-41. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2004.
• Lewis, David. Convention. Cambridge, MA: HUP, 1969.
• Moore, George E. "Reply to my critics." In The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, edited by Paul Schilpp, 112-136. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1942.
• Moore, George E. "Russell's theory of descriptions." In The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, edited by Paul Schilpp, 80-99. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1944.
• Recanati, Francois. Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: CUP, 1987.
• Reimer, Marga. "Performative utterances: a reply to Bach and Harnish." Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1995): 655-675.[Crossref]
• Sadock, Jerrold and Arnold Zwicky. "Speech act distinctions in syntax." In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, edited by Timothy Shopen, 155-196. Cambridge: CUP, 1985.
• Sampson, Geoffrey. "Pragmatic self verification and performatives." Foundations of Language 7 (1971): 300-302.
• Schiffer, Stephen. Meaning. Oxford: OUP, 1972.
• Searle, John. Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP, 1969.
• Searle, John. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: CUP, 1979.
• Searle, John. Intentionality. Cambridge: CUP, 1983.
• Searle, John. "How do performatives work?" Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (1989): 535-558.[Crossref]
• Searle, John., and Daniel Vanderveken. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: CUP, 1985.
• Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: HUP, 1986.
• Stampe, Dennis. "Meaning and truth in the theory of speech acts." In Syntax and Semantics 3, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 170-198. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
• Strawson, Peter. "Intention and convention in speech acts." Philosophical Review October 1964: 439-460.
• Zwicky, Arnold and Jerrold Sadock. "Ambiguity tests and how to fail them." In Syntax and Semantics 4, edited by John Kimball, 21-44. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10016-007-0002-y