What Does Only Assert and Entail?

• Authors: Keiko Yoshimura
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper investigates the semantics of English only and two equivalent expressions in Japanese -dake and -shika, giving attention to two aspects: (i) the debate over the status of two propositions that are involved in the use of ONLY expressions and (ii) the semantic and pragmatic differences among ONLY items, if any. We claim that a sentence with ONLY expressions entails both the affirmative and negative propositions. This view raises issues with Horn's original claim (1969) as well as van Rooij and Schulz's (2005) while supporting Atlas (1991, 1993) and Horn (2002). We claim then that the difference in strength between the affirmative and negative propositions emerges from what is asserted by that sentence. One of the bases for our claim is that there is a significant difference in behavior between entailment and assertion of a given sentence, following Horn (2002). This difference explains the difference between -dake on the one hand and -shika and -only on the other: -dake differs from only and -shika in that it asserts the affirmative proposition while -shika and only asserts the negative proposition.

Keywords

EN

ONLY; focus; Japanese; assertion; entailment

• Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
• Journal: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
• Year: 2007
• Volume: 3
• Issue: -1
• Pages: 97-117

Dates

published

2007-01-01

online

2007-08-20

Contributors

author

Keiko Yoshimura

• University of Chicago

References

• Aoyagi, Hiroshi and Toru Ishii. "On Agreement-inducing vs. Non-Agreementinducing NPIs." NELS. North Eastern Linguistic Society 24 (1994): 1-15.
• Atlas, Jay David. "Topic/comment, presupposition, logical form and focus stress implicatures: The case of focal particles only and also." Journal of Semantics 8 (1991): 127-147.
• Atlas, Jay David. "The importance of being ‘only’: Testing the neo-Gricean versus neoentailment paradigms." Journal of Semantics 10 (1993): 301-318.
• von Fintel, Kai. "Exceptive constructions." Natural Language Semantics 1 (1993): 123-148.
• Giannakidou, Anastasia. "Affective dependencies." Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (1999): 367-421.
• Giannakidou, Anastasia. "Negative … concord?" Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18 (2000): 457-523.
• Giannakidou, Anastasia. "Only, emotive factive verbs, and the dual nature of polarity dependency." Language 83 (2006): 575-603.
• Hoeksema, Jack. "The logic of exception." ESCOL. Proceedings of Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 87 (1987): 110-113.
• Horn, R. Laurence. "A presuppositional analysis of only and even." CLS. Papers from Chicago Linguistic Society 5 (1969): 97-108.
• Horn, R. Laurence. "Assertoric inertia and NPI licensing." CLS. Papers from the 38th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on Polarity and Negation (2002): 55-82.
• Konomi, Keiji. "‘Shika~nai’ Koobun no Koozoo." In Eigogaku no Siten, edited by Ohye Saburo, Sensei Tuitoo and Ronbunsyuu Henshuu-iinkai, 369-392. Kyushu Daigaku Syuppankai, 1989.
• Kuno, Susumu. "The syntax and semantics of the dake and shika constructions." Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 7 (1999): 144-172.
• Moltmann, Friederike. "Exception sentences and polyadic quantification." Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1995): 223-280.
• Muraki, Masatake. "The shika-nai construction and predicate restructuring." In Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics, edited by John Hinds & Irwin Howard, 155-177. Tokyo: Kaitakusha, 1978.
• Nathan, Lance. "Either: negative polarity meets focus sensitivity." Honors Thesis. Brown University, 1999.
• Numata, Yoshiko. "Toritate-shi." Ch.2 of Iwayuru Nihongo Joshi No Kenkyuu, edited by Keiichiro Okutsu, Yoshiko Numata and Takeshi Sugimoto. Tokyo: Nihongo no Bonjinsha, 1986.
• Numata, Yoshiko. "mo", "dake", "sae" nado -toritate- [Focusing on "mo", "dake", "sae" and so on]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan, 1992.
• Oyakawa, Takatsugu. "On the Japanese shika-nai construction." Gengo Kenkyuu 67 (1975): 1-20.
• van Rooij, Robert and Katrin Schulz. "Only: meaning and implicatures. The very incomplete short version." In Sinn und Bedeutung 9 (2005), edited by Emar Maier, Corien Bary and Janneke Huitink, 314-324.
• Watanabe, Akira. "The genesis of negative concord: syntax and morphology of negative doubling." Linguistic Inquiry 35 (2004): 559-612.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10016-007-0007-6