On the Notion of Communicational Grammar in Political Linguistics

• Authors: Piotr Chruszczewski
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Any communicational grammar may be viewed as a linguistic study concerned with rules responsible for efficient communication, and can be used as a tool for researching almost any issue that falls under the term political linguistics-a sub-field of linguistics which analyzes how ideologies are put into service to legitimate power and inequality. From the linguistic point of view we would perceive discourse to be a dynamic and changing phenomenon, profoundly rooted in its nonverbal context. The core of any discourse is established by particular texts formed by their speaker/writer. The meaning of the texts and their decoding by the hearer/reader seems to depend to a great extent not only on the cognitive processes that take place in the mind of the information receiver but also on the contextual embeddings which are: a) the situational embedding, that is where the text is produced (here: in what type of co-texts the text is situated); b) the social embedding, that is within what social group the text is produced (here: to what type of readers the text is directed to); and c) the cultural embedding, which is apparently the most difficult to grasp, for it directly translates into what we understand under the nebulous term culture (here: what is the cultural preparation of readers who are going to receive the text). The cultural embedding of texts should be held responsible for the projected associations it may induce in the receiver of textual messages and at the same time types of nonverbal cultural scripts and schemata that are supposed to accompany a verbal text. In light of the above, a model in which one has certain verbal texts that trigger certain socially and culturally specific behaviors can be called the communicational grammar of a particular discourse.

Keywords

EN

Discourse; semantic leaps; communicational grammar; nationalism; political linguistics; anthropological linguistics

• Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
• Journal: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
• Year: 2007
• Volume: 3
• Issue: -1
• Pages: 145-155

Dates

published

2007-01-01

online

2007-08-20

Contributors

author

Piotr Chruszczewski

• University of Wrocław

References

• Anderson, John M. Grammar of Case. Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.
• Aoun, Joseph. A Grammar of Anaphora. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985.
• Azar, Betty S. Fundamentals of English Grammar. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents, 1985.
• Bald, Wolf. Active Grammar. München: Langescheidt-Longman, 1984.
• Bartsch, Renate. The Grammar of Adverbials. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1976.
• Blommaert, Jan and Chris Bulcaen, eds. Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1997.
• Brooke-Rose, Christine. Grammar of Metaphor. London: Secker and Warburg, 1958.
• Campbell, Alistair. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, [1959] 1983.
• Chruszczewski, Piotr P. "Defining political discourse structure." In Cognitive Perspectives on Language, edited by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 207-215. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999.
• Chruszczewski, Piotr P. The Communicational Grammar of Political Discourse. Berlin: Logos, 2002.
• Chruszczewski, Piotr P. American Presidential Discourse. An Analysis. Berlin: Logos, 2003.
• Chruszczewski, Piotr P. "Semantic leaps in the interpretation of communicational grammars of discourses." In Relevance Studies in Poland Vol. 1, edited by Ewa Mioduszewska, 319-327. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, 2004a.
• Chruszczewski, Piotr P. "To counterattack with words." In Imagery in Language, edited by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & Alina Kwiatkowska, 685-692. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2004b.
• Cottrell, Robert D. Grammar of Silence. A Reading of Marguerite de Novarre's Poetry. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1986.
• Coulson, Seana. Semantic Leaps. Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
• Cramp, Rosemary. Grammar of Anglo-Saxon Ornament: A General Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
• Crawford, Sue E. S. and Elinor Ostrom. "A grammar of institutions." American Political Science Review 89 (1995): 582-600.
• Dijk van, Teun A. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage, 1998.
• Duranti, Alessandro. "Linguistic anthropology: history, ideas, and issues." In Linguistic Anthropology. A Reader, edited by Alessandro Duranti, 5-22. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
• Gethin, Hugh. Grammar in Context. London/Glasgow: Collins ELT, 1983.
• Horn, George M. Lexical-Functional Grammar. Trends in Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton, 1983.
• Hudson, Richard. Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.
• Hundt, Marianne. New Zealand English Grammar: Fact or Fiction? A Corpusbased Study in Morphosyntactic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1998.
• Jespersen, Otto. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin, [1924] 1968.
• Jespersen, Otto. Essentials of English Grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin, [1933] 1974.
• Mittins, William. A Grammar of Modern English. London: Methuen, 1973.
• Nickel, Gerhard and Dietrich Nehls, eds. Models of Grammar, Descriptive Linguistics and Pedagogical Grammar. Papers from the 5th International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Montreal 1978. Heidelberg: Julius Groos, 1980.
• Potter, Simeon. English Grammar for Foreign Students. London: Pitman, 1932.
• Quirk, Randolph and Sidney Greenbaum. University Grammar of English. London: Longman, 1980.
• Sampson, Geoffrey. Stratificational Grammar. A Definition and an Example. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.
• Sauerl, Karl M. Spanish Conversation Grammar. [Spanische Konversations-Grammatik zum Schul und Privatunterricht]. Heidelberg: Julius Groos, 1891.
• Shapiro, Michael. Sense of Grammar. Language as Semiotic. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1983.
• Teich, Elke. Systemic-Functional Grammar in Natural Language Generation. Linguistic Description and Computational Representation. London: Cassell, 1999.
• Thomas, John. Theory and Practice of Creole Grammar. London: New Bacon Book Ltd., 1969.
• Willis, Dave. Collins Cobuild Student's Grammar. Practice Material. London: Harper Collins, 1992.
• Winter, Eugene O. Towards a Contextual Grammar of English. The Clause and Its Place in the Definition of Sentence. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1982.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10016-007-0010-y