2008 | 4 | 2 | 241-261
Article title

No Aggression, Only Teasing: The Pragmatics of Teasing and Banter

Title variants
Languages of publication
A bone of contention among researchers is whether the primary function of humour is the expression of aggression against the hearer or the promotion of solidarity between the interlocutors. It is commonly averred that teasing boasts a dichotomous nature, i.e. malignant and benevolent. The former coincides with the potential for criticising, mocking and ostracising the interlocutor, whereas the latter accounts for playfulness and bonding capacity.The overriding goal of the paper is to expound the rapport-building function, which is here postulated to be inherent to teasing. First and foremost, I will determine the scope of interest differentiating between putdown humour and teases, which may assume the form of retorts and develop into multi-turn teases, i.e. banter. Subtypes of teasing will be discussed with a view to proving that it is inherently devoid of genuine aggressiveness. The underlying premise is that teases, even if ostensibly aggressive, i.e. face-threatening, are geared towards solidarity, in conformity with the framework of politeness, including mock impoliteness, holding between intimates. Also, teases fulfil a few subordinate functions such as defunctionalisation or mitigation of face-threatening messages they may carry.
Physical description
  • University of Łódź
  • Boxer, Diana and Francesca Cortés-Conde. "From bonding and biting: Conversational joking and identity display." Journal of Pragmatics 23 (1997): 275-295, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8.[Crossref]
  • Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978/1987.
  • Bubel, Claudia. "Film audiences as overhearers." Journal of Pragmatics 40 (2008): 55-71, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.001.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Coates, Jennifer. "Gossip revisited: language in all-female groups. In Women in their Speech Communities, edited by Jennifer Coates, 94-121. London: Longman, 1989.
  • Coates, Jennifer. Woman Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
  • Culpeper, Jonathan. "Towards an anatomy of impoliteness." Journal of Pragmatics 25 (1996): 349-367, doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3.[Crossref]
  • Drew, Paul. "Po-faced receipts of teases." Linguistics 25 (1987): 219-253.
  • Edelsky, Carole. "Who's got the floor?" Language in Society 10 (1981): 383-421.[Crossref]
  • Eder, Donna. "‘Go get ya a French!’: Romantic and sexual teasing among adolescent girls." In Gender and Conversational Interaction, edited by Deborah Tannen, 17-30. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  • Fine, Gary. "Sociological approaches to the study of humor." In Handbook of Humor Research Vol. 1, edited by Paul McGhee & Jeffrey Goldstein, 159-191. New York: Springer Verlag, 1983.
  • Freud, Sigmund. Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious, trans. by J. Stranchey. New York: Norton, 1905/1960.
  • Fry, William, Jr. Sweet Madness: A Study of Humor. Palo Alto: Pacific Books, 1963.
  • Grice, Paul. "Logic and conversation." In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41-58. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  • Hay, Jennifer. "Jocular abuse patterns in mixed-group interaction." Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 6 (1995a): 26-55.
  • Hay, Jennifer. "Only teasing." New Zealand English Newsletter 9 (1995b): 32-35.
  • Hay, Jennifer. "Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women." Journal of Pragmatics 32 (2000): 709-742, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00069-7.[Crossref]
  • Holmes, Janet. "Sharing a laugh: pragmatic aspects of humour and gender in the workplace." Journal of Pragmatics 38 (2006): 26-50, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.007.[Crossref]
  • Holmes, Janet and Meredith Marra. "Having a laugh at work: how humour contributes to workplace culture." Journal of Pragmatics 34 (2002): 1683-1710, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00032-2.[Crossref]
  • Hutchby, Ian and Robin Wooffitt. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity, 1998.
  • Keith-Spiegel, Patricia. "Early conceptions of humour: Varieties and issues." In The Psychology of Humour, edited by Jeffrey Goldstein & Paul McGhee, 3-39. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
  • Keltner, Dacher, Lisa Capps, Ann Kring, Randall Young and Erin Heerey. "Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review." Psychological Bulletin 127.2 (2001): 229-248, doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.127.2.229.[Crossref]
  • Kotthoff, Helga. "Impoliteness and conversational humor." Folia Linguistica 30 (1996): 299-327.
  • Kotthoff, Helga. "Oral genres of humor. On the dialectic of genre knowledge and creative authoring." Pragmatics 17.2. (2007): 263-296.
  • Kowalski, Robin. "‘I was only kidding!: Victims’ and perpetrators' perceptions of teasing." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26.2 (2000): 231-241, doi: 10.1177/0146167200264009.[Crossref]
  • La Fave, Lawrence and Roger Mannell. "Does ethnic humour serve prejudice?" Journal of Communication 26.3 (1976): 116-123.[Crossref]
  • Lakoff, Robin. "The logic of politeness: Or minding your p's and q's." Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 292-305. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973.
  • Lampert, Martin and Susan Ervin-Tripp. "Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends." Journal of Pragmatics 38.1 (2006): 51-72, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.004.[Crossref]
  • Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, 1983.
  • Lennox Terrion, Jenepher and Blake E. Ashforth. "From ‘I’ to ‘we’: The role of putdown humour and identity in the development of a temporary group." Human Relations 55.1 (2000): 55-88, doi: 10.1177/001872602128782240.[Crossref]
  • Long, Debra and Arthur Graesser. "Wit and humour in discourse processing." Discourse Processes 11 (1988): 35-60.[Crossref]
  • Martineau, William. "A model for the social function of humour." In The Psychology of Humour, edited by Jeffrey Goldstein & Paul McGhee, 101-125. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
  • Mulkay, Michael. On Humor: Its Nature and its Place in Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1972.
  • Norrick, Neal. "Stock conversational witticisms." Journal of Pragmatics 8 (1984): 195-209, doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(84)90049-3.[Crossref]
  • Norrick, Neal. Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.
  • Norrick, Neal. "Involvement and joking in conversation." Journal of Pragmatics 22 (1994): 409-430, doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)90117-1.[Crossref]
  • Norrick, Neal. "Issues in conversational joking." Journal of Pragmatics 35 (2003): 1333-1359, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00180-7.[Crossref]
  • Pawluk, Cheryl. "Social construction of teasing." Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19.2 (1989): 145-167, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00142.x.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Pollio, Howard. "Notes toward a field theory of humour." In Handbook of Humour Research Vol. 1, edited by Paul McGhee and Jeffrey Goldstein, 213-230. New York: Springer, 1983.
  • Raskin, Victor. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985.
  • Scarborough Voss, Laurie. "Teasing, disputing and playing: Cross-gender interactions and space utilization among first and third Graders." Gender and Society 11 (1997): 238-256, doi: 10.1177/089124397011002006.[Crossref]
  • Scollon, Ron and Suzie Scollon. "Face in interethnic communication." In Language and Communication, edited by Jack Richards and Richard Schmidt, 156-188. London: Longman, 1983.
  • Straehle, Carolyn. "‘Samuel?‘ ‘Yes dear?’ Teasing and conversational rapport." In Framing in Discourse, edited by Deborah Tannen, 210-229. New York: Open University Press, 1993.
  • Tannen, Deborah and Cynthia Wallat. "Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: examples from a medical examination/interview." In The Discourse Reader, edited by Adam Jaworski and Nicolas Coupland, 346-366, London: Routledge, 1999, doi: 10.2307/2786752.[Crossref]
  • Tholander, Michael and Karin Aronsson. "Doing subteaching in school groupwork. Positioning, resistance, and participation frameworks." Language and Education 17.3 (2003): 208-234.[Crossref]
  • Veale, Tony, Kurt Feyaerts and Geert Brône. "The cognitive mechanisms of adversarial humor." HUMOR 19.3 (2006): 305-340, doi: 10.1515/HUMOR.2006.016.[Crossref]
  • Zajdman, Anat. "Did you mean to be funny? Well if you say so…." HUMOR 5.4 (1992): 357-368.
  • Zajdman, Anat. "Humorous face-threatening acts: Humor as strategy." Journal of Pragmatics 23 (1995): 325-339, doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)00038-G.[Crossref]
  • Ziv, Avner. Personality and Sense of Humour. New York: Springer, 1984.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.