Figure-Ground Duality in Humour: A Multi-Modal Perspective

• Authors: Tony Veale
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Creativity with words or pictures is not simply a matter of communicating a message, but of communicating it well, in a way that is effective, original and which defies convention. Effectiveness here pertains to the pragmatic goals of the communicator, and the extent to which these are achieved, while originality pertains to the manner in which the message is framed. Language, for instance, provides a wealth of conventions for framing a message; indeed, the vast part of language is a solidified body of culturally received conventions, which fix the meaning of words and phrases and determine the contextual appropriateness of specific terms, topics and conversational strategies. To frame a message in a novel manner that stretches or even subverts these conventions, a communicator must imbue the elements of communication-whether words, gestures or pictorial elements-with additional meanings. This duality of meaning is not arbitrary, however, or communication cannot succeed. Rather, a creative communicator must draw out secondary meanings that are already implicit in the stock elements of communication, in a way that the audience can understand, appreciate and replicate. Duality thus lies at the heart of creative communication, allowing a communicator to say one thing and simultaneously convey another, secondary message that may augment or subvert the overt content of the communication. This mechanism, which draws out and gives prominence to that which is normally unseen or implicit, is Figure-Ground Reversal.

Keywords

EN

Humour; images; creativity; figure-ground reversal; incongruity; GTVH

• Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
• Journal: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
• Year: 2008
• Volume: 4
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 63-81

Dates

published

2008-01-01

online

2008-08-06

Contributors

author

Tony Veale

• The Royal Flemish Academy (VLAC), University College Dublin

References

• Attardo, Salvatore and Victor Raskin. "Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representational model." Humor 4.3 (1991): 293-347.
• Attardo, Salvatore, Christian F. Hempelmann and Sara Di Maio. "Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modeling incongruities and their resolutions." Humor 15.1 (2002): 3-46, doi: 10.1515/humr.2002.004.[Crossref]
• Coulson, Seana. Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
• Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. "Conceptual integration networks." Cognitive Science 22.2 (1998): 133-187, doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1.[Crossref]
• Fineman, Mark. The Nature of Visual Illusion. New York: Dover, 1996.
• Hofstadter, Douglas R. and Liane Gabora. "Synopsis of the Workshop on Humor and Cognition." Humor 2.4 (1989): 417-440.
• Langacker, Ronald W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
• McCloud, Scott. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Perennial, 1994.
• Minsky, Marvin. "Jokes and the logic of the cognitive unconscious." A.I. Memo No. 603, M.I.T. A.I. Laboratory, 1980.
• Oring, Elliott. Engaging Humor. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2003.
• Raskin, Victor. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1985.
• Ritchie, Graeme. "Developing the Incongruity-Resolution Theory." The Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on Creative Language: Stories and Humour, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1999.
• Schank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. New York: Wiley, 1977.
• Simpson, Aislinn. "OGC reveals new logo to red faces." Daily Telegraph, April 29, 2008.
• Suls, Jerry M. "A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis." In The Psychology of Humor, edited by Jeffrey H. Goldstein and Paul E. McGhee, 81-100. New York: Academic, 1972.
• Veale, Tony. "Incongruity in humor: Root-cause or epiphenomenon?" Humor 17.4 (2004): 419-428, doi: 10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.419.[Crossref]
• Veale, Tony. "Computability as a test on linguistic theories." In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, Applications of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven and Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 461-481. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.
• Veale, Tony. and Diarmuid O'Donoghue. "Computation and blending." Cognitive Linguistics 11.3-4 (2000): 253-282, doi: 10.1515/cogl.2001.016.[Crossref]
• Veale, Tony., Kurt Feyaerts and Geert Brône. "The cognitive mechanisms of adversarial humor." Humor 19.3 (2006): 305-338, doi: 10.1515/HUMOR.2006.016.[Crossref]
• Verbeek, Gustave. The Incredible Upside-Downs of Gustave Verbeek. Summit, NJ: Rajah Press, 1963.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10016-008-0009-z