PL EN


2008 | 4 | 1 | 109-130
Article title

The "Dark Side" of Humour. An Analysis of Subversive Humour in Workplace Emails

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Although a substantial amount of research has investigated the various functions of humour in a workplace context, electronic means of communication have largely been ignored. This is particularly surprising since electronic communication in the workplace is increasingly gaining significance. This seems to be especially true for email, which in many workplaces is the preferred medium for communicating transactional as well as relational topics. Drawing on a corpus of about 100 emails collected in an academic setting, we explore how humour is used in workplace emails. Our specific focus is on subversive humour, which often functions as a tool to express frustration and dissent, and ultimately to challenge existing power relations. Our analysis illustrates that subversive humour is an excellent means to make fun of established and normative workplace practices by exaggerating and ridiculing them, and to re-define organisational reality by offering alternative interpretations. These functions of subversive humour appear to be particularly useful for those in relatively powerful positions: by employing humour to convey critical and potentially threatening messages in acceptable ways, the senders manage to express their dissent and frustration with the wider organisational system while, at the same time, escaping the scrutiny of the very organisation that they are symbolically challenging.
Keywords
Publisher
Year
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
109-130
Physical description
Dates
published
2008-01-01
online
2008-08-06
Contributors
  • University of Hong Kong
author
  • University of Hong Kong
References
  • Holmes, Janet., Meredith Marra and Louise Burns. "Women's humour in the workplace: A quantitative analysis." Australian Journal of Communication 28.1 (2001): 83-108.
  • Holmes, Janet., Meredith Marra and Meredith Marra. "Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends." Humor 15.1 (2002): 65-87, doi: 10.1515/humr.2002.006.[Crossref]
  • Lakoff, George. "‘War on terror’, rest in peace…" Rockridge Institute (February 28, 2006)
  • Abdullah, Nor Aniza. Relational Communication in Organisational Email: A Malaysian Case Study. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya, 2003.
  • Baron, Naomi. "Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email." Language and Communication 18 (1998): 133-170, doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00005-6.[Crossref]
  • Brown, Reva Berman and Dermott Keegan. "Humor in the hotel kitchen." Humor 12.1 (1999): 47-70.
  • Cameron, Deborah. Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage, 2001.
  • Caudron, Shari. "Humor is healthy in the workplace." Personnel Journal 71.6 (1992): 63-68.
  • Clouse, Wilburn and Karen Spurgeon. "Corporate analysis of humor." Psychology: A Journal of Human Behaviour 32.3-4 (1995): 1-24.
  • Collinson, David L. "‘Engineering humour’: Masculinity, joking and conflict in shop-floor relations." Organization Studies 9.2 (1988): 181-199, doi: 10.1177/017084068800900203.[Crossref]
  • Consalvo, Carmine M. "Humor in management: No laughing matter." Humor 2.3 (1989): 285-297.
  • Coser, Rose Laub. "Laughter among colleagues. A study of social functions of humor among the staff of a mental hospital." Psychiatry 23 (1960): 81-95.[PubMed]
  • Diekmannshenke, Hajo. "From postcard to e-card: Tradition and change in the smallest spaces." In Language and New Media: Linguistic, Cultural, and Technological Evolutions, edited by Charley Rowe and Eva L. Wyss. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press (in print).
  • Duncan, Jack W. and Philip J. Feisal. "No laughing matter: Patterns of humour in the workplace." Organizational Dynamics 17.3 (1989): 18-30, doi: 10.1016/S0090-2616(89)80024-5.[Crossref]
  • Duncan, Jack W., Larry R. Smeltzer and Terry L. Leap. "Humor and work: Applications of joking behavior to management." Journal of Management 16.2 (1990): 255-278, doi: 10.1177/014920639001600203.[Crossref]
  • Ehrenberg, Tamar. "Female differences in creation of humor relating to work." Humor 8.4 (1995): 349-362.
  • Fairclough, Norman. Language and Power. London: Longman, 1989.
  • Fairclough, Norman. and Ruth Wodak. "Critical discourse analysis." In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited by Teun van Dijk, 258-284. London: Sage, 1997.
  • Fatt, James Poon Teng. "When business can be fun." Management Research News 25.1 (2000): 39-48, doi: 10.1108/01409170210783016.[Crossref]
  • Fleming, Peter and André Spicer. "Beyond power and resistance: New approaches to organizational politics." Management Communication Quarterly 21.3 (2008): 301-309, doi: 10.1177/0893318907309928.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Gumperz, John. "On interactional sociolinguistic method." In Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, edited by Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts, 453-471. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.
  • Holmes, Janet. "No joking matter! The functions of humour in the workplace." Paper presented at the Australian Linguistics Society Conference. Queensland: Brisbane University, 1998.
  • Holmes, Janet. "Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace." Discourse Studies 2.2 (2000): 159-185, doi: 10.1177/1461445600002002002.[Crossref]
  • Lynch, Owen Hanley. "Humorous communication: Finding a place for humour in communication research." Communication Theory 12.4 (2002): 423-445, doi: 10.1093/ct/12.4.423, 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00277.x.[Crossref]
  • Morreall, John. "Humor and work." Humor 4.3-4 (1991): 359-373.
  • Mullany, Louise. "Gender, politeness and institutional power roles: Humour as a tactic to gain compliance in workplace business meetings." Multilingua 23 (2004): 13-37, doi: 10.1515/mult.2004.002.[Crossref]
  • Mullany, Louise. Gendered Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2007.
  • "Oxford English Dictionary: The definitive record of the English language"
  • Pizzini, Franca. "Communication hierarchies in humour: Gender differences in the obsterical/gynaecological setting." Discourse and Society 2.4 (1991): 477-488, doi: 10.1177/0957926591002004008.[Crossref]
  • Pogrebin, Mark R and Eric D. Poole. "Humor in the briefing room. A study of the strategic uses of humor among police." Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 17.2 (1988): 183-210, doi: 10.1177/089124188017002003.[Crossref]
  • Poster, Mark. The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Cambridge: Polity, 1990.
  • Rodrigues, Suzana B. and David L. Collinson. "‘Having fun?’ Humour as resistance in Brazil." Organization Studies 16.5 (1995): 739-768, doi: 10.1177/017084069501600501.[Crossref]
  • Rosenberg, Lawrence. "A qualitative investigation of the use of humor by emergency personnel as a strategy for coping with stress." Journal of Emergency Nursing 17 (1998): 197-202.
  • Rowe, Charley. "Genesis and evolution of an email sibling code." Ph.D. diss. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2001.
  • Rowe, Charley. "Building ‘code’: Development, maintenance, and change in a private language." American Speech 82.3 (2007): 235-261, doi: 10.1215/00031283-2007-011.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Schnurr, Stephanie. Leadership Discourse at Work. Interactions of Humour, Gender and Workplace Culture. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, fc.
  • Seckman, Mark A. and Carl J. Couch. "Jocularity, sarcasm, and relationships: An empirical study." Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18.3 (1989): 327-344, doi: 10.1177/089124189018003004.[Crossref]
  • Sproull, Lee and Sara Kiesler. "Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication." Management Science 32 (1986): 1492-1512. Reprinted in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings, edited by Irene Grief. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman, 1988.[Crossref]
  • Ulloth, Joan Kay. "A qualitative view of humor in nursing classrooms." Journal of Nursing Education 42.3 (2003): 125-129.
  • Van Dijk, Teun A. "The study of discourse." In Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. I, edited by Teun Van Dijk, 1-34. London: Sage, 1997.
  • Waldvogel, Joan. The Role, Status and Style of Workplace Email: A Study of Two New Zealand Workplaces. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, 2005.
  • Waldvogel, Joan. "Greetings and closings in workplace email." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (2007): 456-477, doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00333.x.[Crossref]
  • Wodak, Ruth. "What CDA is about - a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments." In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 1-13. London: Sage, 2001.
  • Yates, Simeon. "English in cyberspace." In Redesigning English: New Texts, New Identities, edited by Sharon Goodman and David Graddol, 106-133. London: Routledge, 1996.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_v10016-008-0010-6
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.