Shared Content as Speaker Meaning

• Authors: Eleni Kriempardis
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Cappelen and Lepore (2005; 2006; 2007) have recently emphasised the significance of a minimal notion of perfectly shared content for pragmatic theories. This paper argues for a similar notion, but assumes that a satisfactory defence cannot be achieved along the lines of the existing debate between Minimalism and Contextualism (e.g. Carston 2002, Recanati 2004). Rather, it is necessary to consistently distinguish two functional domains: the subjective processing domain and the interpersonal domain of communication, each with its own kind of utterance meaning. I will argue that it is the mutually recognised content of the speaker's overt commitment that should be identified as ‘speaker meaning’. Diverging from the (post-) Gricean tradition, it is conventionally restricted (minimal), but genuinely pragmatic (speaker-dependent). Functional considerations show that it is, moreover, unnecessary to include further elements in ‘speaker meaning’. The distinction between two notions of utterance meaning with very different characteristics allows us to integrate the assumption of perfect sharing, which explains people's trust in communication, and the subjectivity of the hearer's inferences into a coherent and powerful model.

Keywords

EN

Speaker meaning; context-dependence; minimalism; communicative success

• Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
• Journal: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 161-190

Dates

published

2009-01-01

online

2010-01-06

Contributors

author

Eleni Kriempardis

• University of Cambridge

References

• Alston, William P. 2000. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
• Bach, Kent. 1992. "Intentions and demonstrations." Analysis 52: 140-146, doi: 10.2307/3328374.[Crossref]
• Bach, Kent and Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.
• Cappelen, Herman and Ernie Lepore. 2005. Insensitive Semantics. A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Cappelen, Herman and Ernie Lepore. 2006. "Shared content." In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, edited by Ernie Lepore and Barry C. Smith, 1020-1055. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Cappelen, Herman and Ernie Lepore. 2007. "Relevance theory and shared content." In Pragmatics, edited by Noel Burton-Roberts, 115-135. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Carston, Robyn. 2000. "Explicature and semantics." UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 1-46.
• Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Carston, Robyn. 2006. "Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction." UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 37-69, doi: 10.1007/s11229-007-9191-8.[Crossref]
• Gauker, Christopher. 2003. Words without Meaning. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.
• Grice, Paul. 1957. "Meaning." Philosophical Review 66: 377-388.[Crossref]
• Grice, Paul. 1969/1989. "Utterer's meaning and intentions." In Studies in the Way of Words, edited by Paul Grice, 86-116. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.
• Grice, Paul. 1975. "Logic and conversation." In Syntax and Semantics. Vol.3: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
• Kenyon, Tim. 2005. "Non-sentences, implicature, and success in communication." In Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech, edited by Reinaldo Elugardo and Robert J. Stainton, 131-147. Berlin: Springer, doi: 10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_7.[Crossref]
• Keysar, Boaz. 2007. "Communication and miscommunication: The role of egocentric processes." Intercultural Pragmatics 4: 71-84, doi: 10.1515/IP.2007.004.[Crossref][WoS]
• Keysar, Boaz. 2008. "Egocentric processes in communication and miscommunication." In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, edited by Istvan Kecskes and Jacob Mey, 227-296. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, doi: 10.1515/9783110211474.2.277.[Crossref]
• Keysar, Boaz. 1998. Dale J. Barr and William S. Horton. "The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach." Current Directions in Psychological Sciences 7: 46-50.
• Keysar, Boaz. 2003. Shuhong Lin and Dale J. Barr. "Limits on the theory of mind use in adults." Cognition 89: 25-41.
• Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.
• Lewis, David K. 1969. Convention. A Philosophical Study. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.
• Liedtke, Frank. 1995. "Das Gesagte und das Nicht-Gesagte: Zur Definition von Implikaturen." In Implikaturen, edited by Frank Liedtke, 19-46. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
• Oswald, Steve and Didier Maillat. 2008. "Intentions and context in uncooperative communication: Pragmatic views on manipulation." Talk presented at the 4th Łódź Symposium New Developments in Linguistic Pragmatics, 17 May 2008.
• Pinker, Steven. 2007. The Stuff of Thought. Language as a Window into Human Nature. London: Allen Lane.
• Pinker, Steven. 2008. "Language as a window into human nature." Abstract for talk presented at Cambridge University Linguistic Society, 10 June 2008.
• Recanati, François. 2001. "What is said." Synthèse 128: 75-91.
• Recanati, François. 2003. "The limits of expressibility." In John Searle, edited by Barry Smith, 189-213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Recanati, François. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[WoS]
• Saul, Jennifer M. 2002. "What is said and psychological reality: Grice's project and relevance theorists' criticisms." Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 347-372.
• Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Searle, John R. 1980. "The background of meaning." In Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, edited by John R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer and Manfred Bierwisch, 221-232. Dordrecht: Reidel.
• Searle, John R. 1989. "Individual intentionality and social phenomena in the theory of speech acts." In Semiotics and Pragmatics. Proceedings of the Perpignan Symposium, edited by Gérard Deledalle, 3-17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Searle, John R. 2007. "What is language: Some preliminary remarks." In John Searle's Philosophy of Language. Force, Meaning and Mind, edited by Savas L. Tsohatzidis, 15-45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Strawson, Peter F. 1964. "Intention and convention in speech acts." The Philosophical Review 73 (4): 439-460, doi: 10.2307/2183301.[Crossref]
• Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 2004. "Relevance theory." In The Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 607-632. Oxford: Blackwell, doi: 10.1002/9780470756959.ch27.[Crossref]
• Wedgwood, Daniel. 2006. "Shared assumptions: semantic minimalism and relevance theory." Ms. University of Edinburgh.[WoS]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10016-009-0012-z