A Note on the Linguistic (In)Determinacy in the Legal Context

• Authors: Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper discusses linguistic vagueness in the context of a semantically restricted domain of legal language. It comments on selected aspects of vagueness found in contemporary English normative legal texts and on terminological problems related to vagueness and indeterminacy both in the legal domain and language in general. The discussion is illustrated with selected corpus examples of vagueness in English legal language and attempts to show problems of the relation between vagueness and ambiguity in the context of legal institutionalised systems.The discussion also evokes theoretical issues which pertain to the relation between legal texts and their contexts, the problem of how linguistic forms acquire their contextual meaning and how linguistic expressions are disambiguated. These issues are further related to the post-Gricean theory of relevance, its inferential model of communication, and the interplay between the linguistic code and inferential processes in (specialised) communication.

Keywords

EN

vagueness; legal language; indeterminacy; relevance

• Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
• Journal: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 201-226

Dates

published

2009-01-01

online

2010-01-06

Contributors

author

Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka

• University of Łódź

References

• Asprey, Michele. 2003. Plain Language for Lawyers (3rd ed) Sydney: The Federation Press.
• Bhatia, Vijay, Jan Engberg, Maurizio Gotti, and Dorothee Heller (eds.) 2005. Vagueness in Normative Texts. Berlin: Peter Lang.
• Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Ssusan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
• Bix, Brian. 1993. Law, Language and Legal Determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Blakemore, Diane. 1992. Understanding Utterances. An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Blakemore, Diane. 1989. "Linguistic form and pragmatic interpretation: the explicit and the implicit" In: The Pragmatics of Style, edited by Leo Hickey, 28-51. London: Routledge.
• Cappelen, Herman & Ernie Lepore. 2005. Insensitive Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Carston, Robyn. 2004. "Explicature and semantics" In Semantics: A Reader, edited by Steven Davis & Brendan S. Gillon, 817-845. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Carston, Robyn. 2009. "The Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Pragmatics and Limits of Explicit Communication" International Review of Pragmatics 1 (1): 35-62, doi: 10.1163/187731009X455839.[Crossref]
• Carston, Robyn & George Powell. 2006. "Relevance Theory-New Directions and Developments" In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, edited by Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith, 341-360. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Cao, Deborah. 2007. "Inter-lingual uncertainty in bilingual and multilingual law" Journal of Pragmatics 39: 69-83, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.005.[Crossref]
• Conte, Amadeo Giovanni & Paolo Di Lucia. 2009. (this volume). "Pragmatic Ambiguity: The Thetic Function of Modality". Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5.2: 191-199, doi: 10.2478/v10016-009-0009-7.[Crossref]
• Culver, Keith C. 2004. "Varieties of Vagueness" University of Toronto Law Journal 54 (1): 109-127, doi: 10.1353/tlj.2004.0002.[Crossref]
• Davies, Martin. 2003. "Philosophy of language" In The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy 2nd ed., edited by Nicholas Bunnin & Eric P. Tsui-James, 90-146. Oxford: Blackwell, doi: 10.1002/9780470996362.ch5.[Crossref]
• Davies, Martin. 2006. "Foundational Issues in the Philosophy of Language" In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language, edited by Michael Devitt and Richard Hanley, 19-40. Oxford: Blackwell, doi: 10.1002/9780470757031.ch1.[Crossref]
• Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Endicott, Timothy A. O. 2000. Vagueness in Law. Oxford: OUP.
• Endicott, Timothy A. O. 2002. "Law and Language", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2002 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/law-language/ (accessed January 2009).
• Felkins, Leon. 1998. Understanding Vagueness. An online article available at
• Felkins, Leon. 2004. Some Consequences of Ambiguity and Vagueness. An online article available at
• Franken, Nathalie. 1997. "Vagueness and approximation in relevance theory" Journal of Pragmatics 28: 135-151, doi 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00082-3.[Crossref]
• Fredsted, Elin. 1998. "On semantic and pragmatic ambiguity" Journal of Pragmatics 30: 527-541, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00029-0.[Crossref]
• Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Hart, Herbert L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Harris, Roy. 1996. The Language Connection. Philosophy and Linguistics. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
• Harris, Roy. 1998. Introduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.
• Harris, Roy & George Wolf (eds.) 1998. Integrational Linguistics: A First Reader. Oxford: Pergamon.
• Huddleston, Rodney, Geoffrey K. Pullum et al. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Uuniversity Press.
• Hutton, Christopher. 1996. "Law Lessons for Linguists? Accountability and Acts of Professional Classification", Language and Communication 16 (3): 205-14. Reprinted in Roy Harris and George Wolf (eds.) (1998), 294-304, doi: 10.1016/0271-5309(96)00010-9.[Crossref]
• Katz, Jerald. 1977. Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force: A study of the contribution of sentence meaning to speech acts. New York: Crowell.
• Kempson, Ruth. 1977. Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Klinge, Alex. 1992. Legal Discourse and Modality. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
• Lauchman, Richard. 2001-2005. Plain Language. A handbook for writers in the U.S. Government. Available at
• Łozowski, Przemysław. 2000. Vagueness in Language. From truth-conditional synonymy to un-conditional polysemy. Lublin: UMCS.
• Ludlow, Peter. 2005. "Contextualism and the New Linguistic Turn in Epistemology". In Contextualism in Philosophy, edited by Gerhard Preyer & George Peter, 11-50. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Mowat, Christine. 1999. A Plain Language Handbook for Legal Writers. Scarborough, ON: Carssell.
• Myrczek, Ewa. 2004. (MS). Equivalence in Legal Translation, PhD Dissertation, University of Silesia, Poland.
• Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna. 2000. Zagadnienie nieostrości. Warszawa: Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii UW.
• Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna. 2005. "O nieostrości i niewyraźności" Ruch Filozoficzny 2: 229-234.
• Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna. 2006. Rodzaje naturalne. Rozważania z filozofii języka. Warszawa: Semper.
• Quirk, Radolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1992. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.
• Recanati, François. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Robinson, Stanley. 1973. Drafting: Its application to conveyancing and commercial documents. London: Butterworths.
• Sapir, Edward. 1958. "The Status of Linguistics as a Science" (1929), Reprinted in: Edward Sapir Culture, Language and Personality, edited by David G. Mandelbaum. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, doi: 10.2307/409588.[Crossref]
• Schiffer, Stephen. 2006. "Vagueness" In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language, edited by Michael Devitt and Richard Hanley, 225-243. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Searle, John, R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Shapiro, Stewart 2006. Vagueness in Context. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Solan, Lawrence M. 2004. "Pernicious ambiguity in contracts and statutes" Chicago-Kent Law Review 9 (3): 859-888.
• Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Tałasiewicz, Mieszko. 2002. "Pragmatyczna koncepcja nieostrości" Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 1: 101-113.
• Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. Legal Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Toolan, Michael, 2000, "Legal Statute and Integrational Linguistics: Determining the Meaning of Theft". A paper delivered at the Sociolinguistic Symposium, Bristol UK, April 2000, available online at http://artsweb.bham.ac.uk/MToolan/integrationtheft.html (accessed June 2008).
• Trosborg, Anna. 1991. "An Analysis of Legal Speech Acts in English Contract Law" Hermes: Journal of Linguistics 6: 65-90.
• Trosborg, Anna. 1995. "Statutes and contracts: An analysis of legal speech acts in the English language of the law" Journal of Pragmatics 23: 31-53, doi: 10.1016/03782166(94)00034-C.[Crossref]
• Williams, Christopher. 2005. Tradition and Change in Legal English. Verbal Constructions in Prescriptive Texts. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Williamson, Timothy. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.
• Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 2004. "Relevance Theory" In Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Lawrence R. Horn & Gregory Ward, 607-632. Oxford: Blackwell, doi: 10.1002/9780470756959.ch27.[Crossref]
• Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona. 2001 (MS). Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects of Speech Acts in English Legal Texts. PhD dissertation, University of Lodz, Poland.
• Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona. 2005. "English legal texts in translation-the relevance-theoretic approach" Relevance Studies in Poland. 2: 169-181.
• Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona. 2008. "The Relevance of Vague Expressions in the Law" Research in Language 6: 167-187.
• Zhang, Qiao. 1998. "Fuzziness-vagueness-generality-ambiguity". Journal of Pragmatics 29: 13-31, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00014-3.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10016-009-0013-y