Topoi inCritical Discourse Analysis

• Authors: Igor Žagar
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Topos (topoi in plural) is one of the most widely-used concepts from classical argumentation theory (dating back to Aristotle and Cicero). It found its way not only in philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and linguistics; it found its way in everyday life and everyday conversation as well.In this article, I will examine the role that topoi play in Critical Discourse Analysis. Starting with definitions from Aristotle and Cicero, contrasting them with new conceptualisations by Perelman and Toulmin, and examining the superficial use of topoi in everyday conversation, I will try to show that Critical Discourse Analysis (especially Ruth Wodak's Discourse-Historical Approach) relies mostly on simplified, unreflected use of topoi as found in everyday use, thus neglecting much more productive, theoretical elaborations of the concept.

Keywords

EN

Topoi; warrant; rhetoric; argumentation; Critical Discourse Analysis

• Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
• Journal: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 3-27

Dates

published

2010-01-01

online

2010-06-30

Contributors

author

Igor Žagar

• University of Maribor, Slovenia

References

• Aristotle. Topica (Transl. by E. S. Forster). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1989.
• Aristotle. Art of Rhetoric (Transl. by J. H. Freese). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1991.
• Cicero. De Oratore (Transl. by E. W. Sutton. and H. Rackham). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1988.
• Cicero. De Partitione Oratoria (transl. by H. Rackham). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1992.
• Cicero. Topica (Transl. by T. Reinhardt). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
• Curtius, Robert E. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990.
• Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman, 1995.
• Fairclough, Norman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.
• Fairclough, Norman. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London/New York: Routledge, 2003.
• Galasinska, Aleksandra and Krzyzanowski, Michal. eds. Discourse and Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
• Kienpointner, Manfred. Alltagslogik. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommannholzboog, 1992.
• Krzyzanowsky, Michal. "On the ‘Europeanisation’ of Identity Constructions in Polish Political Discourse after 1989." In Discourse and Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Aleksandra Galasinska and Michal Krzyzanowski, 95-113. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
• Perelman, Chaim and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, 1983.
• Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak. Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetoric of Racism and Antisemitism. London/New York: Routledge, 2001.
• Richardson, John. E. (Mis)Representing Islam: the racism and rhetoric of British Broadsheet newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004
• Richardson, John. E. and Ruth Wodak. "The impact of visual racism: Visual arguments in political leaflets of Austrian and British far-right parties." (Manuscript. Paper presented at the 2008 Venice Argumentation Conference), forthcoming.
• Rubinelli, Sara. Ars Topica. The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Berlin: Springer, 2009.
• Toulmin, Stephen. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
• van Leeuwen, Theo. Introducing Social Semiotics. London/New York: Routledge, 2004.
• van Leeuwen, Theo. Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
• van Leeuwen, Theo. and Kress, Günther. Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London/New York: Routledge, 2006.
• Wodak, Ruth. The Discourse of Politics in Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
• Wodak, Ruth. and Chilton, Paul. eds. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2005.
• Wodak, Ruth. and Meyer, Michael. eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 2006.
• Wodak, Ruth. and van Dijk, Teun. eds. Racism at the Top. Klagenfurt: Drava, 2000.
• Wodak, Ruth. Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl and Karin Liebhart. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10016-010-0002-1