Covariant Realism

• Authors: Robert Crease
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Hermeneutic phenomenology of science implies a particular version of realism. It approaches scientific entities in a twofold perspective: in their relation to other parts of the theory (as elements in a theoretical "language"), and in relation to the lifeworld as mediated by laboratory practices; as "fulfilled" in laboratory situations that "produce" worldly objects. The question then arises of the relation between the two perspectives; as Ginev has pointed out, there is danger of a theoretical essentialism which is implied when the mathematical projection is conceived as operationalized by experiment. Ginev's proposal to avoid this involves the concept of "inscription." This paper proposes another approach, covariant realism, which draws from Heidegger's notion of formal indication and which makes explicit the temporality of theoretical objects in the flow of the research process. Formal indication does not so much describe phenomena as call them to our attention in a way that we can activate ourselves (as in laboratory contexts); it characterizes phenomena which are understood to be provisionally grasped, already interpreted, and anticipated as able to show themselves differently in different contexts. The value of this approach suggests deeper possibilities for hermeneutic phenomenology of science than have hitherto been explored.

Keywords

EN

hermeneutic phenomenology of science; hermeneutic approach to realism; formal indication

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 19
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 223-232

Dates

published

2009-06-01

online

2009-06-19

Contributors

author

Robert Crease

• Department of Philosophy, Stony Brook University, 213 Harriman Hall Stony Brook, NY 11794-3750 USA

References

• Cassirer, E. Ernst Cassirer, "The Concept of Group and the Theory of Perception." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research V, 1-31, 1944.
• Crowe, B.Heidegger's Religious Origins. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2006.
• Crease, R. This is Your Philosophy. Physics World (April), 2002. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/5279
• Crease, R. Introduction to special issue of Man and World (30, 3). In R.Crease (Ed.). Hermeneutics and the Natural Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.
• Dahlstrom, D. Heidegger's Method: Philosophical Concepts as Formal Indications. Review of Metaphysics 47,1994.
• Dreyfus, B.What Computers Can't Do. New York: Harper & Row, 1979.
• Ginev, D.A Passage to a Hermeneutic Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997.
• Ginev, D.The Context of Constitution. Beyond the Edge of Justification. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006.[WoS]
• Ginev, D.The Tenets of Cognitive Existentialism. Athens: The University of Ohio Press, 2009 (forthcoming).
• Heelan, P.Space-Perception and the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
• Heidegger, M.Being and Time. (Trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson.) New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
• Heidegger, M.What is a Thing? (Trans. W. B. Barton, Jr. and Vera Deutsch.) Chicago: Henry Regnery Co., 1967.
• Heidegger, M.Basic Concepts. (Trans. G. Aylesworth.) Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1993.
• Heidegger, M.Pathmarks. W. MacNeill (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
• Heidegger, M.Ontology - the Hermeneutics of Facticity. (Trans. J. van Buren.) Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1999.
• Heidegger, M.Towards the Definition of Philosophy. London: Athlone, 2000.
• Hooke, R.Micrographia.
• Husserl, E.Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. (Trans. D. Carr.) Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1970.
• Husserl, E.The Essential Husserl. D. Welton (Ed.). Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1999.
• Kisiel, T.The Genesis of Heidegger's Being & Time. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
• Kockelmans, J.Ideas for a Hermeneutic Phenomenology of the Natural Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993.
• Solar, L., Sankey, H., Hoyningen-Huene, P.Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities? Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.
• Van Fraassen, B.The Empirical Stance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10023-009-0035-7