The Role and Nature of Freedom in Two Normative Theories of Democracy

• Authors: Martin Šimsa
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article examines the role and the nature of freedom in two normative concepts of democracy, in the work of Hans Kelsen and of Emanuel Rádl. Both authors wrote their work on democracy between the two world wars. Kelsen formulated his concept of democracy in On the Substance and Value of Democracy (1920), a book which has clearly been influenced by the political thinking of Kant and Rousseau. Kelsen shares Rousseau's idea of general will and on this basis the principle of majority. Rádl outlines his theory of freedom and democracy in The War between the Czechs and the Germans (1928), Nationality as a Scientific Problem (1929) and On German Revolution (1933). Rádl distinguishes between three types of freedom and democracy: natural, majority and contractual. Rádl asserts that only in the third type of freedom, in which freedom is connected with responsibility and the law is freedom true. He considers the first type of freedom to be anarchical freedom, which can easily be misused. The second type of freedom is better than the first, but worse than the third. The author compares these concepts of freedom and democracy then and today and shows how they are linked to the questions of justice and solidarity at national and cosmopolitan levels.

Keywords

EN

Freedom; norms; democracy; Rádl; Kelsen

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 114-123

Dates

published

2010-06-01

online

2010-06-24

Contributors

author

Martin Šimsa

• Department of Political Science and of Philosophy, Philosophical Faculty, University of Jan Evangelista Purkyně, České mládeže 8, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic

References

• Habermas, J.Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie in Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1996.
• Kelsen, H.Allgemeine Theorie der Normen. Wien: Manz, 1979.
• Kelsen, H.Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. Tübingen, 1920.
• Masaryk, T. G. Světová revoluce (The World Revolution). Praha, 1925.
• Philosophisches Wörterbuch. Stuttgart: Alfred Kroner Verlag, 1965.
• Popper, K. R.The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.
• Rádl, E.Náboženství a politika (Religion and Politics). Praha: Jan Laichter, 1921.
• Rádl, E.Západ a Východ (West and East). Praha: Jan Laichter, 1925.
• Rádl, E.Moderní věda (Modern Science). Praha: Jan Laichter, 1926.
• Rádl, E.O smysl našich dějin (Making Sense of Our History). Praha: Jan Laichter, 1925.
• Rádl, E.The History of Biological Theories. London: Oxford University Press, 1930/1988.
• Rádl, E.Válka Čechů s Němci (The War between the Czechs and the Germans). Praha: Melantrich 1928/1993.
• Rádl, E.Národnost jako vědecký problém (Nationality as a Scientific Problem). Praha: O. Girgal, 1929.
• Rádl, E.O německé revoluci (On the German Revolution). Praha: Jan Laichter 1933.
• Rádl, E.Filosofie dějin I (The Philosophy of History). Praha: Jan Laichter, 1932 (Olomouc 1998).
• Rádl, E.Útěcha z filosofie (Consolation from Philosophy). Praha, 1946.
• Rawls, J.A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press, 1999.
• Schumpeter, J.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge, 2000.
• Taylor, C.Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10023-010-0013-0