2009 | 4 | 2 | 7-22
Article title

The Interorganizational Challenge of Agricultural Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Title variants
Languages of publication
The case study reported below examines USAID's "Linking Agricultural Markets with Producers" program. This program complemented Bosnia and Herzegovina's overall sustainable agriculture policies. Implementing organizations quickly recognized that sustainability must be achieved not only from an environmental perspective, but in the interorganizational domain as well. Public, private and nonprofit players had to develop the social, economic and political infrastructure required for sustainable agricultural projects to succeed. These institutional changes were at times more difficult than the sustainable agriculture policies and practices they supported. Framed within LAMP's identification of constraints and proposed solutions for agricultural reform, we explored the interorganizational linkages required for success. We identified three distinct types: 1) those within the international community, 2) those within the local community and 3) those between international and local organizations. The case illustrates the institutional and managerial obstacles to and opportunities for implementing sustainable development reforms in transition settings.
Physical description
  • Eastern Connecticut State University, Department of Business Administration
  • Aubrey, L. 1997. The politics of development cooperation: NGOs, gender and partnerships in Kenya. NY: Routledge.
  • Barr, P.S. 1998. Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of Interpretation and its role in strategic change. Organization Science 9(6): 644-669.[Crossref]
  • Benson, J.K. 1975. The interorganizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly 20:229-249.[Crossref]
  • Black, J.K. 1999. Development in Theory and Practice. Oxford: Westview Press.
  • Boyce, J.K. 1995. Adjustment toward peace: an introduction. World Development 23(12): 2067-2077.[Crossref]
  • Brinkerhoff, D.W. 1996. Coordination issues in policy implementation networks: An illustration from Madagascar's environmental action plan. World Development 24(9): 1497-1510.[Crossref]
  • Brinkerhoff, D.W. 2004. Good governance, clientelism, and old patrimonialism: New perspectives on old problems. International Public Management Journal 7(2): 163-184.
  • Brinkerhoff, J.M. 2004. Emerging trends in development management: Tension and complexity in the continuing search for solutions. International Public Management Journal 7(2): 149-161.
  • Burns, L.R. and Wholey, D.R. 1993. Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. Academy of Management Journal 36(1): 106-138.[Crossref]
  • Carrol, G.R. and Teo, A.C. 1996. On the social networks of managers. Academy of Management Journal 39(2): 421-440.[Crossref]
  • Clark, B.R. 1965. Interorganizational patterns in education. Administrative Science Quarterly 10:224-237.[Crossref]
  • Dickson, P., and Weaver, K. 1997. Environmental determinants and individual-level moderators of alliance use. Academy of Management Journal 40:404-425.[Crossref]
  • Emery, F.E. and Trist, L. 1965. Causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations 18:18-32.
  • Evans, P. 1996a. Introduction: Development strategies across the public-private divide. World Development 24(6): 1033-1037.
  • Evans, P. 1996b. Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development 24(6): 1119-1132.[Crossref]
  • Evans, W.M. and Klemm, R.C. 1980. Interorganizational relations among hospitals: A strategy, structure, and performance model. Human Resources 33(5): 315-337.
  • Fombrun, C.J. 1986. Structural dynamics within and between organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 31:403-421.[Crossref]
  • Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C.A. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review 15(4): 603-625.
  • Goldsmith, A.A. (1996). Strategic thinking in international development: Using management tools to see the big picture. World Development 24(9): 1431-1439.[Crossref]
  • Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360-1380.[Crossref]
  • Gray, B. 1985. Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations 38(10): 911-936.[Crossref]
  • Griffen, K. 2000. Studies in development strategy and systematic transformation. NY: St. Martin's Press.
  • Gulati, R. 1995a. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choices in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38:85-112.[Crossref]
  • Gulati, R. 1995b. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 6190-653.
  • Gulati, R and Gargiulo, M. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology 104(5): 1439-1493.[Crossref]
  • Gulati, R. and Westphal, J.D. 1999. Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 473-506.[Crossref]
  • Hannan, W.F. and Freeman, J.T. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82: 131-160.
  • Hardy, C. and Philips, N. 1998. Strategies of engagement: Lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organization Science 9(2): 217-230.[Crossref]
  • Hasic, T. 2006. Management of Complexities in Post-war Reconstruction (BiH and the International Community. SEE Journal. February: 6-17.
  • Haughton, J. 1998. The reconstruction of war-torn economies. CAER Discussion Paper No. 23. Cambridge: Harvard Institute for International Development.
  • Human, S.E. and Provan, K.G. 2000. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 327-365.[Crossref]
  • Ibarra, H. 1993a. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal 36(3): 471-501.[Crossref]
  • Ibarra, H. 1993b. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review 18(1): 56-87.
  • Inkpen, A.C. and Beamish, P.W. 1997. Knowledge, bargaining power and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review 22(1): 177-202.
  • Kiggundu, M.N. 1996. Integrating strategic management tasks into implementing agencies: From firefighting to prevention. World Development 24(9): 1417-1430.[Crossref]
  • Klonglan, G.E., Warren, R.D., Winkelpleck, J.M., and Paulson, S.K. 1976. Interorganizational measurement in the social services sector: Differences by hierarchical level. Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 675-687.[Crossref]
  • Kochan, T.A. 1975. Determinants of the power of boundary units in an interorganizational bargaining relation. Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 434-451.[Crossref]
  • Koza, M.P. and Lewin, A.Y. 1998. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science 9(3): 255-263[Crossref]
  • Kraatz, M.S. 1998. Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal 41(6): 621-643.[Crossref]
  • Lammers, C.J. 1988. The interorganizational control of an occupied country. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 438-457.[Crossref]
  • Larson, A. 1992. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 76-104.[Crossref]
  • Larsson, R. and Finkelstein, S. (1999) 'Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case study of synergy realization'. Organizational Science 10(1): 1-25.[Crossref]
  • Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. 1967. Organization and environment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Leeson, P.F. and Minogue, M.M. 1988. Perspectives on development. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Levine, S. and White, P.E. 1961. Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 5: 583-601.[Crossref]
  • Martin, E. 2004. Privatization in Bosnia and the Craft of IOR Process Analysis. Organization Studies 25(7): 1115-1157.[Crossref]
  • Martin, E. and Miller, J. 2003. Developing Bosnia and Herzegovina: Understanding Large-Scale Interorganizational Systems. Voluntas 14(2): 145-166.[Crossref]
  • McCaffrey, D., Faerman, S., And Hart, D. 1995. The Appeal and Difficulties of Participative Systems. Organization Science 6: 603-627.[Crossref]
  • Meyer, A. D. 1982. Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 515-537.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Miner, A.S., Amburgey, T.L. and Stearns, T.M. 1990. Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 689-713.[Crossref]
  • Molnar, J.J. 1978. Comparative organizational properties and interorganizational interdependence. Social Science Review 63(1): 24-47.
  • Mosse, D., Farrington, J. and Rew, A. 1998. Development as Process. ODI Development Policy Studies. NY: Routledge Research.
  • Njoh, A.J. 1993. The effectiveness theory of interorganizational relations explored in the context of a developing nation. International Review of Administrative Science 59: 235-250.[Crossref]
  • Ostrom, E. 1996. Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy and development. World Development 24(6): 1073-1087.[Crossref]
  • Parkhe, A. 1993. Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal 36: 794-829.[Crossref]
  • Pech, L. (2000) 'Is Dayton Falling?: Reforming Media in Bosnia and Herzegovina, International Journal of Communications Law and Policy, Issue 4, Winter, pp. 1-28.
  • Porter, M.E. (2002). Global Competitiveness Report, World Economic Forum
  • Powell, W., Koput, K.W., and Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116-145.[Crossref]
  • Provan, K.G. and Milward, H.B. 1995. A preliminary theory of interorganizational effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 1-33.[Crossref]
  • Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Randall, V. and Theobald, R. 1998. Political change and underdevelopment. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Rice, R.E. and Aydin, C. 1991. Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 219-244.[Crossref]
  • Riggs, F. 1960. Comparative Administration Group. Ford Foundation.
  • Rondinelli, D. 1994. Strategic management in foreign aid agencies: Developing a results-based performance system. International Review of Administrative Sciences 60: 465-482.[Crossref]
  • Rondinelli, D. 1987. Development administration and US foreign policy. Boulder: Lynne Renner.
  • Ruef, M. and Scott, W.R. 1998. A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 877-904.[Crossref]
  • Schermerhorn, J.R. 1975. Determinants of interorganizational cooperation. Academy of Management Journal 18(4): 846-856.[Crossref]
  • Shenkar, O. and Li, J. 1999. Knowledge search in international cooperative ventures. Organization Science 10(2): 134-143.[Crossref]
  • Shuey, A. (2003) 'Democracy According to Dayton: The United States and International Community's Role in Bosnia-Hercegovina, International Affairs Review, pp. 110-118.
  • Sklar, R.L. 1987. Developmental democracy. Society for Comparative Study of Society and History. 686-714.
  • Sklar, R.L. 1995. The new modernization. Issue: A Journal of Opinion 23(1): 19-21.
  • Spradley, J.P. (1979) The ethnographic interview. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth.
  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, CA.
  • Svensson, J. 1997. When is foreign aid policy credible? Aid dependence and conditionality. The World Bank, Policy Research Department Policy Research Working Paper #1740, Washington, DC.
  • Terreberry, S. 1968. The evolution of organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 590-613.[Crossref]
  • Tichy, N.M., Tushman, M.L. and Fombrun, C. 1979. Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review 4(4): 507-519.
  • Tisch, S.J. and Wallace, M.B. 1994. Dilemmas of development assistance: The what, why and who of foreign aid. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Todaro, M. 1994. Economic development in the third world, 5th ed. London: Longman.
  • Van de Ven, A. H. 1976. On the nature, formation and maintenance of relations among organizations. Academy of Management Review 1(4): 24-36.
  • Weber, J. 1995. Influences upon organizational ethical subclimates: A multi-departmental analysis of a single firm. Organization Science 6(5): 509-523.[Crossref]
  • Westphal, J.D., Gulati, R. and Shortell, S.M. 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly 42:366-394.[Crossref]
  • Young-Ybarra, C. and Wiersema, M. 1999. Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: The influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theories. Organization Science 10(4): 439-459.[Crossref]
  • Zaheer, A., McEvily, B. and Perrone, V. 1998. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science 9(2): 141-159.[Crossref]
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.