2012 | 45 | 3 | 100-107
Article title

Towards Understanding Collaborative Learning in the Social Media Environment

Title variants
Languages of publication
‘Social media’, ‘Web 2.0’, ‘collaborative learning’ and user co-creation are just some of the terms that describe changes in the role of information and communication technology (ICT) in business, private life and society. The changing face of ICT has finally brought about the fulfilment of the term ‘Information Society’ and made an important impact on many fields of research, including collaborative learning. The effective use of ICT in support of group collaboration has been researched and discussed. The effectiveness was attributed to systematically organized and facilitated processes. Nevertheless, the results are not always better when group support systems (GSS) are used in comparison to face-to-face work. In contrast to the well-organized GSS-supported learning process, the social media environment is non-structured, rule-free and even chaotic. In this paper, we research the possibilities of eliciting group knowledge in the group-learning process in a social media environment. A total of 24 students assigned into three groups participated in the three-week long study. Their task was to solve a given research topic by solely using an unfamiliar social media environment and to present their findings after three weeks. Students were observed in their natural learning environment (school, home, the Flowr virtual environment), and their attitudes on collaborative work using social media tools were measured with a questionnaire at the end of the study. The results suggest that non-structured social media environment stimulates self-management of the group. Some insights into trust, motivation and conflicts in the collaborative problem solving are discussed.
Physical description
  • Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, Kidričeva 55a, 4000 Kranj, Slovenia
  • Barabási, A. (2002). Linked: The science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing
  • Beckman, M. (1990). Collaborative Learning: Preparation for the Workplace and Democracy, College Teaching, 38(4), pp. 128-133.
  • Collier, K. G. (1980). Peer-Group Learning in Higher Education: The Development of Higher-order Skills, Studies in Higher Education, 5(1), pp. 55-62. DOI:10.1080/03075078012331377306[Crossref]
  • Cooper, J. (1990). Cooperative Learning and College Teaching: Tips from the Trenches, Teaching Professor, 4(5): 1-2.
  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. In Advances in Learning and Instruction Series, Dillebourg P. (ed). Elsevier Science, Inc., New York.
  • Dubois, D. M. (2010). Breakthrough in the Human Decision Making Based on an Unconscious Origin of Free Will, ACTA SYSTEMICA, Vol. X(1): 13-18.
  • Fiechtner, S. B. & Davis, E. A. (1992). Why Some Groups Fail: A Survey of Students' Experiences with Learning Groups, In: A. Goodsell, M. Maher, V. Tinto, and Associates (eds.), Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. University Park: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, Pennsylvania State University.
  • Fjermestad, J. (2004). An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research, Decision Support Systems, 37(239-263). DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00021-6[Crossref]
  • Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. Bergman Ramos, Trans.), New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2-3): 1-19. DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6[Crossref]
  • Hafkesbrink, J. & Evers, J. (2010). Innovation 3.0 - Embedding into community knowledge: the relevance of trust as enabling factor for collaborative organizational learning. In: Hafkesbrink, J., Hoppe, H.-U. & Schlichter, J. Competence Management for Open Innovation - Tools and IT-Support to Unlock the Potential of Open Innovation, Eul Verlag.
  • Hale, R., & Whitman, P. (1997). Practical Problem Solving and Decision Making. Kogan Page: London.
  • Hsiao, N., & Richardson, G. P., (1999). In search of theories of dynamic decision making: a literature review. In 17th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved February 19, 2012, from
  • Khalifa, M., Davison, R., & Kwok, R. C. W. (2002). The effects of process and content facilitation restrictiveness on GSS mediated collaborative learning. Group Decision and Negotiation, 11: 345-361. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020449317854[Crossref]
  • Kim, Y. (2010). Supporting distributed groups with group support systems: a study of the effect of group leaders and communication modes on group performance. In Strategic Information Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Hunter MG (ed.). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference; 1559-1572.
  • Kljajić Borštnar, M., Kljajić, M., Škraba, A., Kofjač, D., & Rajkovič, V. (2011). The relevance of facilitation in group decision making supported by a simulation model, System Dynamics Review, 27(3): 270-293. DOI: 10.1002/sdr.460[WoS][Crossref]
  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A. & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353. DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2[Crossref]
  • Limayem, M., Khalifa, M. & Ma, S. (2002). Human versus automated facilitation in the GDSS context. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 5: Hammamet, Tunisia, 6-9 October.
  • Lizeo, E. (2005). A Dynamic Model of Group Learning and Effectiveness, System Dynamics Society Conference 2005, Boston, USA.
  • Minocha, S. (2009). An empirically-grounded study on the effective use of social software in education, Education and Training, special double issue on Computer Assisted Collaborative Learning: The New Generation of Simulations and Social Computing in the Business Curriculum, 51(5/6): 381-394. DOI: 10.1108/00400910910987192[Crossref]
  • Potter, A., McClure, M., & Sellers, K. (2010). Mass collaboration problem solving: A new approach to wicked problems. 2010 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, 398-407. DOI: 10.1109/CTS.2010.5478486[Crossref]
  • Rosen, E. (2007). The Culture of Collaboration: Maximizing Time, Talent and Tools to Create Value in the Global Economy, Red Ape Publishing.
  • Rouwette E. A. J. A., Größler, A., & Vennix, J. A. M. (2004). Exploring influencing factors on rationality: a literature review of dynamic decision making studies in system dynamics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21(4): 351-370. DOI: 10.1002/sres.647[Crossref]
  • Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning, Organization Science Vol. 2, No. 1, Special Issue: Organizational Learning: Papers in Honor of (and by) James G., pp. 125-134.
  • Škraba, A., Kljajić, M. & Leskovar, R. (2003). Group exploration of system dynamics models: is there a place for a feedback loop in the decision process? System Dynamics Review, 19: 243-263. DOI: 10.1002/sdr.274[Crossref]
  • Škraba, A., Kljajić, M. & Kljajić Borštnar, M. (2007). The role of information feedback in the management group decision making process applying system dynamics models. Group Decision and Negotiation, 16: 77-95. DOI: 10.1007/s10726-006-9035-9[Crossref]
  • Tapscott, D. & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Penguin.
  • Wang, H. (1997). Knowledge level analysis of group decision support systems. Expert System with Application, 13: 155-162. DOI: 10.1016/S0957-4174(97)00016-X[Crossref]
  • Wells, G., (1999). Dialogic Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.