2011 | 15 | 1 | 107-116
Article title

Short communications. eLearning in EFL: Problems and Solutions

Title variants
Languages of publication
This paper investigates certain problems encountered when technology-based instruction is employed in teaching English as a foreign language. Three EFL specialists from Saudi Arabia are interviewed and their insights on solving those problems are presented. Many academics feel ill-equipped to utilize new technologies in teaching because they are technophobes who fear or dislike technology or do not have sufficient experience in employing computer applications. Other academics found technology-based teaching time-consuming, leading to increased workload, and demanding high levels of technical support. Solutions to face the reluctance to engage in electronic forms of teaching include the provision of instructional support to provide faculty with the necessary technical skills, changing college policies to consider teaching with technology an activity for which faculty receive credit, improving the reward system to motivate faculty to better productivity and higher performance, and addressing critical work-related issues, such as workload.
Physical description
  • Umm Al-Qura University
  • Bartscherer, P. (1999). The Pew Grant Program in course redesign. Available at:
  • Burpee, P. & Wilson, B. (1991). Distance education in the Faculty of Education. McGill Journal of Education, Spring, 7-15.
  • Carpi, A. (2001). Improvements in undergraduate science education using webbased instructional modules: The natural science pages. Journal of Chemical Education 78, 1709-1712.
  • Chrzanowski, J. (2002). Teaching and learning in the online environment: Changing teacher-student relationships online. Paper presented at the Eighth Sloan-C International Conference. November 10th. Orlando, FL.
  • Cravener, P. (1999). Faculty experiences with proving online courses: Thorns among the roses. Computers in Nursing, 17, 42-47.
  • Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society: Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. London: HMSO.
  • DiPiro, J. T. (1999). The Virtual University - higher education ‘on-line.’ American Journal Of Pharmaceutical Education, 63, 170-174.
  • Fessakis, G., Petrou, A., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2004). Synchronous computer mediated collaborative activities among collocated students: Conditions that make them valuable in every day educational practice. Paper presented at the CSCL SIG First Symposium, October 7th-9th, Lausanne, Switzerland. Available at:
  • Firdyiwek, Y. (1999). Web-Based courseware tools: Where is the pedagogy? Educational Technology, January-February, 29-34.
  • Harasim, L., Calvert, T., & Groenboer, C. (1997). Virtual-U: A Web-based system to support collaborative learning. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web Based Instruction (pp. 149-158). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Hokanson, B., Hooper, S. (2000). Computers as cognitive media: examining the potential of computers in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 537-552.
  • Huff, W. D. (2000). Colleges and universities: Survival in the information age. Computers and Geosciences, 26, 635-640.
  • Jackson, G. (1994). Incentives for planning and delivering agricultural distance education. Agriculture Education Magazine, 66, 15-16.
  • Kearsley, G. (1998). A guide to online education. Available at:
  • Kilian, C. (1996). An online writing course. Available at:
  • Lee, J. (2001). Instructional support for distance education and faculty motivation, commitment, satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 153-160.[Crossref]
  • Littlejohn, A. & Sclater, N. (1998). Overcoming conceptual barriers to the use of internet technology in university education. Proceedings of WebNet98. Available at:
  • Mereba, T. (2003). Managing transformation: Aligning technology initiatives with institutional priorities. TechTrends, 47, 42-44.
  • Milheim, W. (1993). Using computer-based instruction with adult learners. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 41, 2-7.
  • Morgan, G. (2003). Faculty use of course management system. Educause Centre for Applied Research. Available at:
  • Olcott, D. J. & Wright, S. J. (1995). An institutional support framework for increasing faculty participation in postsecondary distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9, 5-17.
  • Poling, D. J. (1994). E-mail as an effective teaching supplement. Educational Technology, 34, 53-55.
  • Sliwa, S. (1994). Re-engineering the learning process with information technology. Academe, 80, 8-12.
  • Sosabowski M., Herson K., & Lloyd A. (1998). July. Enhancing learning and teaching quality: integration of networked learning technologies into undergraduate modules. Active Learning, 8, 20-25.
  • Spratt, C., Palmer, S., & Coldwell, J. (2000). Using technologies in teaching: An initiative in academic staff development. Educational Technology & Society, 3, 455-461.
  • Tearle, P., Dillon, P., & Davies, N. (1999). Use of information technology by English university teachers. Developments and trends at the time of the National Inquiry Into Higher Education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23, 5-15.
  • Weisskirch, R. S. & Milburn, S. S. (2003). Virtual discussion: Understanding college students' electronic bulletin board use. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 215-225.
  • Williams, V. & Peters, K. (1997). Faculty incentives for the preparation of webbased instruction. In: B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web Based Instruction (pp. 107-110). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Wolcott, L. L. (1997). Tenure, promotion and distance education: Examining the culture of faculty rewards. American Journal of Distance Education, 11, 3-18.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.