Human Honest Signalling and Nonverbal Communication

• Authors: Sławomir Wacewicz , Przemysław Żywiczyński
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The issue of signal reliability (‘honesty’) is widely recognised in language evolution research as one of the most fundamental problems concerning the evolutionary emergence of protolanguage, i.e. early language-like communication. We propose that nonverbal communication is likely to have played an important but underestimated role in language evolution: not directly in the transfer of message contents, but rather in stabilising the emerging protolanguage. We single out one subset of nonverbal cues - nonvocal nonverbal paralinguistic adaptors (NNPAs) - based on their role as indicators of reliability in present-day communication of humans. We suggest that the relatively involuntary and therefore reliable NNPAs might have served to stabilise more volitionally controlled, and therefore less reliable, verbal communication at the initial, bootstrapping stages of its phylogenetic development.

Keywords

EN

communication; language evolution; protolanguage; honest signaling; nonverbal communication; baseline demeanor; signal; cue; ritualization; deception

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Psychology of Language and Communication
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 113-130

Dates

published

2012-12-01

online

2012-12-28

Contributors

author

Sławomir Wacewicz

• English Department, Centre for Language Evolution Studies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Władysława Bojarskiego 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland

author

Przemysław Żywiczyński

• Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń

References

• Abercrombie, D. (1972). Paralanguage. In J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Commu­nication in face to face interaction (pp. 64-70). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
• Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1972). Eye contact, distance and affiliation. In J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in face to face interaction (pp. 301-316). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
• Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communica­tion. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Buhler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.
• Christiansen, M. & Kirby, S. (2003). Language evolution: The hardest problem in science? In M. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution (pp. 1-15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature, 462, 51-57.
• Cody, M.J. & O’Hair, H.D. (1983). Nonverbal communication and deception; dif­ferences in deception cues due to gender and communicator dominance. Com­munication Monographs, 50, 175-192.
• Cowley, S.J. (2011). Distributed language. In S.J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 1-14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Uni­versity Press.
• Druckman, M., Rozelle, R.M., & Baxter, J. C. (1982). Nonverbal communication: Survey, theory, and research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
• Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber and Faber.
• Dusenbery, D.B. (1992). Sensory ecology: How organisms acquire and respond to information. New York: W.H. Freeman.
• Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
• Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and mar­riage. New York: Norton & Company.
• Ekman P. & Freisen, W. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychia­try, 32, 88-106.
• Ekman P. & Freisen, W. (1972). Hand movements. Journal ofCommunication, 22, 353-374.
• Exeline, R.V., Thibaut, J., Hickey, C.B., & Gumpert, P. (1970). Visual interaction in relation to Machiavellianism and an unethical act. In R. Christie & F.L. Geis (Eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism (pp. 53-75). New York: Academic.
• Feyereisen, P. (1991). Brain pathology, lateralization, and nonverbal behaviour. In R.S. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 31-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Fitch, T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Foster, J. & Slayton, M. (2010). Deception, tells, and the evolution of combinato­rial communication. In A.D.M. Smith, M. Shouwstra, B. de Boer, & K. Smith (Eds.), Evolution of language: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Evolution of Language EVOLANG 8 (pp. 405-406). New Jersey: World Scientific.
• Givens, D. (2012). Nonverbal dictionary. <http://center-for-nonverbal-studies>. org/6101.html, DOA 12/10/2012.
• Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychol­ogy Press, a subsidiary of Taylor & Francis.
• Green, M. (2009). Speech acts, the handicap principle and the expression of psy­chological states. Mind and Language, 24 (2),139-163.
• Grice, H.P. [1975] (1999). Logic and conversation. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 66-77). London: Routledge.
• Hailman, J.P. (1977). Optical signals: Animal communication and light. Blooming­ton: Indiana University Press.
• Hale, J.L. & Stiff, J.B. (1990). Nonverbal primacy in veracity judgements. Commu­nication Reports, 3, 383-396.
• Hall, E.T. (1972). A System for the notation of proxemic behavior. In J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in face to face interaction (pp. 247-273). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
• Hauser, M.D. (1997). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Hockett, C.F. (1973). Man’s place in nature. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Hocking, J.E. & Leathers, D.G. (1980). Nonverbal indicators of deception. A new theoretical perspective. Psychological Reports, 51, 119-131.
• Jakobson, R. [1960] (1999). Linguistics and poetics. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 48-54). London: Routledge.
• Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1990). Introduction: What is communication? In D.H. Mellor (Ed.), Ways of communicating (pp. 1-13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Johansson, S. (2005). Origins of language: Constraints on hypotheses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kimura, D. (1993). Neuromotor mechanisms in human communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Knapp, M.L. & Comandena, M.E. (1979). Telling it like it isn’t: A review of theory and research on deception communications. Human Communication Research, 5, 270-285.
• Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (1993). Introduction to behavioural ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
• Krebs, J.R. & Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation. In J.R. Krebs & R. Dawkins (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary ap­proach (pp. 380-402). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Lachmann, M., Szamadó, S., & Bergstrom, C.T. (2001). Cost and conflict in animal signals and human language. PNAS, 98 (23), 13189-13194.
• Laver, J. & Hutcheson, S. (1972). Communication in face to face interaction. Har- mondsworth: Penguin Books.
• Leathers, D.G. [1997] (2007). Komunikacja niewerbalna [Successful nonverbal com­munication]. Trans. into Polish by M. Trzcińska. Warszawa: PWN.
• Lindblom, B. (1990). On the communication process: Speaker-listener interaction and the develop- ment of speech. In K. Fraurud & U. Sundberg (Eds.), AAC augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 220-230). London: Williams & Wilkins.
• Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
• Masip, J., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. 2004. Defining deception. Anales de Psicologia, 20 (1), 147-171.
• Maynard Smith, J. & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Ohala, J.J. (1994). The frequency codes underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J.J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 325­347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..
• O’Hair, H.D., Cody, M.J., & McLaughlin, M.L. (1981). Prepared lies, spontaneous lies, Machiavellianism, and nonverbal communication. Human Communica­tion Research, 7, 325-339.
• Owren, M.J., Rendall, D., & Ryan, M.J. (2010). Redefining animal signaling: Influ­ence versus information in communication. Biology & Philosophy, 25/5, 755-780.
• Pease, A. (1981). Body language: How to read other’s thoughts by their gestures. London: Sheldon Press.
• Scheflen, A. (1972). The significance of posture in communication systems. In J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in face to face interaction (pp. 225-246). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
• Scott-Phillips, T. (2008). On the correct application of animal signalling theory to human communication. In A.D.M. Smith, K. Smith, & R. Ferrer i Cancho (Eds.),
• Evolution of language: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Evolution of Language (pp. 275-282). New Jersey: World Scientific.
• Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Ozyurek, A. (2004). Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 305 (5691), 1779-1782.
• Seyfarth, R. & Cheney, D. (2003). Signalers and receivers in animal communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 145-173.[Crossref]
• Shannon, C. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
• Slocombe, K.E., Waller, B.M., & Liebal, K. (2011). The language void: the need for multimodality in primate communication research. Animal Behaviour, 81 (5), 919-924.[Crossref]
• Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Tomasello, M. (2008). The origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Wacewicz, S. & Zywiczynski, P. (2010). The relevance of body language to evolution of language research. In A.D.M. Smith, M. Shouwstra, B. de Boer, & K. Smith (Eds.), Evolution of language: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Evolution of Language EVOLANG 8 (pp. 515-516). New Jersey: World Scientific.
• Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal com­munication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 14 (pp. 1-60). New York: Academic.
• ---

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10057-012-0009-5