Importance of Voluntary Environmental Programmes in Ensuring Compliance of Legal Entities with the Requirements of Environmental Law

• Authors: Linas Meškys
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Legal entities are among the most active participants of the social relations in modern society, but they also are becoming one of the main sources of environmental risks.With the growing negative intervention of the economic activities of legal entities into environment, legal regulation of relations of economic activities to environment should not be oriented towards application of state enforcement mechanism solely. Compliance with the environmental law and prevention of its breaches can be ensured efficiently through implementing alternative environmental protection measures, having a preventive character and based on a voluntary basis.However, a command and control mechanism, based on applying enforcement procedures to legal entities, which do not comply with the requirements of environmental law, still prevails in Lithuania. In this context, experience of other countries enables justified assuming that various environmental programmes, grounded on voluntary bases rather than on enforcement can be significantly more efficient for ensuring compliance of legal entities with the requirements of environmental regulations.This article, through experience of the United States, analyses importance of voluntary environmental programmes in guaranteeing compliance of legal entities with the requirements of environmental law, and examines implementation of those programmes within the European Union and Lithuania.

Keywords

EN

Environmental law; voluntary environmental programmes; environmental self-auditing; voluntary disclosure

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
• Year: 2008
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 1-17

Dates

published

2008-01-01

online

2008-11-27

Contributors

author

Linas Meškys

• Vytautas Magnus University Faculty of Law, Lithuania

References

• AQMD Prosecutor's Office. Self-Auditing Policy (2004) //
• Blackman A., Lyon T. P., Sisto N. "Voluntary Environmental Agreements When Regulatory Capacity Is Weak." (2006) //
• Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD. BIAC Statement "Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy." (October 1998) //
• Environmental Commissioner of Ontario. Discussion Paper For Round Table On Self Regulation, Voluntary Compliance And Environmental Protection. (October 1996) //
• Environmental Protection Agency. Incentives for Self-Policing: Discovery, Disclosure, Correction and Prevention of Violations. (May 11, 2000) //
• European Commission. Integrating environmental concerns into development and economic cooperation. (Brussels, 1999) //
• Kesan J. P. "Encouraging Firms to Police Themselves: Strategic Presentations to Promote Corporate Self-Auditing." University of Illinois Law Review 155 (2000) // http://ssrn.com/abstract=263835 (accessed May 25, 2007). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.10.2139/ssrn.263835. [Crossref]
• Lyon T. P., Maxwell J. W. "Self-regulation, taxation and public voluntary environmental agreements." Journal of Public Economics 87 (2003) // http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/tplyon/LyonMaxwellJPubE.pdf (accessed May 3, 2008). DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00221-3. [Crossref]
• Lyon T. P., Maxwell J. W. "‘Voluntary’ Approaches to Environmental Regulation: A Survey." (January 1999) //
• Paquin M., Sbert C. "Towards Effective Environmental Compliance and Enforcement in Latin America and the Caribbean." (2004) //
• Pfaff A. S., Chris W., Lee J., Prager D. "Big Field, Small Potatoes: An Empirical Assessment of EPA's Self-Audit Policy." UVA Law and Economics Research Paper No. 02-02 (2004) //
• Productivity Commission. "Implementation of Ecologically Sustainable Development by Commonwealth Departments and Agencies." Report No. 5 (Canberra, AusInfo, 1999) // available through
• Ray H. M. "Promoting Corporate Self-Compliance: An Examination of the Debate Over Legal Protection for Environmental Audits." 23 ECOLOGY L.Q. 663 (1996).
• Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001. Official Journal L: 2001 04 24, no.114-1.
• Resolution of Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no. 32-1220.
• Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania on approval of Lithuanian Common Programming Document of 2004 - 2006. Official Gazette, 2004, no. 123-4486.
• Rubel F. N. "The Basics of EH&S Self-Auditing." EM, A&WMA's Magazine for Environmental Managers (2006) // http://www.environmental-expert.com/resulteacharticle4.asp?cid=6477&codi=5984 (accessed November 28, 2006).
• Sanchirico C. W., Pfaff A. "Environmental Self-Auditing: setting the proper incentives for discovery and correction of environmental harm." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization Vol. 16, No. 1 (April 2000): 189-208(20) // http://jleo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/16/1/189 (accessed 23 February, 2008).
• Short J. L., Toffel M. W. "Turning Themselves In: Why Companies Disclose Regulatory Violations." Working Paper Series Paper 17 (2005) //
• Stafford S. "Does Self-Policing Help the Environment? EPA's Audit Policy and Hazardous Waste Compliance." Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 6 (2004-2005) // http://www.vjel.org/journal/VJEL10022.html (accessed May 21, 2008).
• Uchida T., Ferraro P. J. "Can Encouraging Voluntary Development of Environmental Management Systems Augment Existing Regulations?" Water Policy Working Paper #2005-015 (2005) //
• UNEP Multi-Stakeholder Workshop on Voluntary Initiatives. "Voluntary Initiatives: current status, lessons learned and next steps." UNEP discussion paper (September 20, 2000) //

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10076-008-0001-5