2010 | 3 | 1 | 1-14
Article title

Simulated Democracy and the Free Market in Russia

Title variants
Languages of publication
The vague character of the interests in a post-totalitarian society, which become clear when seen alongside the clear and concrete interests of the elites, seems to be an important and typical feature of Russia's politics. Consequently, society has been almost completely marginalized as a political subject, and its role has been taken over by the corporate interests groups of "big business". The political regime of present-day Russia has been, to some degree, founded on models known from developed democracies, including the institutions of the president, council of ministers, independent courts, and the freedom of the press or political parties. However, considerable differences occurred in the application of those mechanisms in Russia. For instance, the parties in the Russian political system did not succeed in becoming channels of articulation of social needs. This situation was caused by the fact that the majority of political parties and other political and social organizations have been dominated by various interest groups and have maintained an exclusive character. Those interest groups, represented by political parties, pursued their goal by means of private and public pressure towards state decision-making institutions. Thus, both the state's and the society's priorities have been pushed aside.
Physical description
  • Faculty of Law, University of Bialystok, Poland
  • Faculty of Law, University of Bialystok, Poland
  • Fedorov, Borys. 10 bezumnykh let. Moscow: Sovershenno Sekretno, 1999.
  • Graham, Thomas. "Novyi rossiiskii rezhim." Nezavisimaya Gazeta (November 23, 1995).
  • Hale, Henry E. "Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia." World Politics Vol. 58, No. 1. (October 2005): 133-165.
  • Jelcyn, Borys. Prezydencki marathon. Warsaw: Politeja, 2001.
  • Klamkin, Igor, Vladimir Lapkin, and Vladimir Pantin. "Myezhdu avtoritarizmom i demokatyei." POLIS: Political Studies No. 2 (1995).
  • Lepekhin, Vladimir. "Gruppy interesov kak osnovnoi subyekt sovryemyennoi rrosiiskoi politichyeskoi sistyemy." In: M. Markov, S. McFaul, A. Ryabov, eds. Formirovanye partiino-pollitichyeskoi sistyemy v Rossii. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center, 1998.
  • Olcott, Martha Bril. "Vladimir Putin i neftnyanaya politika Rossii." A New Working Paper in Russian No. 1 (2005).
  • Pappe, Yakov. "Neftyanaya i gazovaya diplomatiya Rossii." Pro et Contra Vol. 2, No. 3 (Summer 1997).
  • Pappe, Yakov. "Otraslevye lobbi v pravityelstve Rossii (1992 - 1996)." Pro et Contra Vol. 1, No. 1 (Winter 1996).
  • Pavlenko, Siergiey. "Pravitelstvo reform u dotatsionnogo koryta." Moskovskiye Novosti (April 18, 1993).
  • Pavlovskii, Gleb. "Stsyenarii √®lyektoralnogo tsikla." Nezavisimaya Gazeta (September 3, 2003).
  • Rodin, Ivan, Dimitriy Sumakin, and Vladimir Terletskii. "Deputaty pytaiutsya dobit Iukos." Nezavisimaya Gazeta (July 15, 2003).
  • Romanova, Lyudmila, and Maryna Volkova. "Vlast pogovorila s dengami." Nezavisimaya Gazeta (July 29, 2000).
  • Romanova, Lyudmila. "Kreml pristupayet k selektsionnomu otboru oligarkhov." Nezavisimaya Gazeta (July 25, 2000).
  • Sakva, Richard. "Rezhimnaya sistyema i grazhdanskoye obshchestvo v Rossii." POLIS: Political Studies No. 1 (1997).
  • Sukavova, Angela, Olga Tropkina, Yevgeniy Malzin, and Petr Orekhin. "Oligarkhi na pereputye. Soratniki ne toropiatsya podderzham Mikhaila Khodorkovskogo." Nezavisimaya Gazeta (October 28, 2003).
  • Shevtsova, Lilia. Putin's Russia. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2003.
  • Tretiakov, Vitaliy. "Goliaf i leviafan." Nezavisimaya Gazeta (June 1, 2000).
  • Zakaria, Fareed. "The Rise of Illiberal Democracy." Foreign Affairs Vol. 76, No. 6 (November/December 1997).
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.