Interpreters of the Constitution: The Problem of Typology

• Authors: Gediminas Mesonis
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The significance of the most important legal act-the Constitution-to the social medium is evident. This constituent act of the nation determines the legal, political, moral and social life of the social medium. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that the Constitution-the content of this constituent act-is the object of everybody’s attention. The Constitution is interpreted by lawyers, public leaders, state institutions, scholars and individual persons. The article analyses the wide-ranging subjects interpreting the Constitution and presents the types of its interpreters. The three most prominent groups of such subjects can be distinguished as: (i) institutions of constitutional justice, (ii) the scholarly doctrine, and (iii) other subjects. The article discusses the legal, scientific and social value of interpretations of the Constitution formulated by these interpreters. It is held that the most meaningful thing in this typology is distinguishing the interpretations according to the factor of their legal effects. The differing scientific, legal and social value of the interpretations does not deny the factor of the significance of their existence. It is recognised that a large number of interpretations of the content of the Constitution come from an immanently related state of discussions taking place in a state under the rule of law and democratic society.

Keywords

EN

Constitution; interpreters of constitution; constitutional jurisprudence; common sense; cycle of interpretation of constitution

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 27-42

Dates

published

2012-12-01

online

2013-02-08

Contributors

author

Gediminas Mesonis

• Faculty of Law, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania),Ozeskienės str. 18, Kaunas 44254, Lithuania
• Justice of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania,Gedimino ave. 36, LT-01104, Vilnius, Lithuania

References

• 1. Alexy, Robert. A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The Theory of RationalDiscourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
• 2. Bergel, Jean Louis. Théorie générale du droit. Paris: Jurisprudence Générale Dalloz, 1999.
• 3. Diritto costituzionale. XVIII Edizione. Napoli: Gruppo Editoriale Esselibri - Simone, 2003.
• 4. Durkheim, Emile. Les Règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2007.
• 5. Dworkin, Ronald. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006.
• 6. Farrar, John Hynes, and Anthony M. Dugdale. Introduction to Legal Method. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1990.
• 7. Holmes, Oliver Wendell. “The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review (1897) // http://constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm (accessed October 17, 2012).
• 8. Jarašiūnas, Egidijus. Démocratie et Liberté: Tension, Dialogue, Confrontation. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2007.
• 9. Jarašiūnas, Egidijus. “The Control of Constitutionality of Legal Acts and the establishment of the Constitutional Court in Lithuania”: 3-39. In: Constitutional Justice in Lithuania. Vilnius, 2003.
• 10. Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.
• 11. Kuhn, Thomas Samuel. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
• 12. Kūris, Egidijus. “The Constitutional Court and Interpretation of the Constitution”: 205-321. In: Constitutional Justice in Lithuania. Vilnius, 2003.
• 13. Mesonis, Gediminas. Konstitucijos interpretavimo metodologiniai pagrindai. Vilnius: Registrų centras, 2010.
• 14. Mesonis, Gediminas. “Tomaš Garrigue Masaryk and Mykolas Römeris: Two figures, Two Approaches to the State and the Constitution.” Acta UniversitatisCarolinae. Iuridica No. 2 (Praha, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, 2010): 37-61.
• 15. Pelikan, Jaroslav. Interpreting the Bible and the Constitution. New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 2004.
• 16. Pollock, Joycelyn M. Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in Criminal Justine. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2007.
• 17. Sajó, András. Constitutional Sentiments. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2011.
• 18. Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory. Durham, London: Duke University Press, 2008.
• 19. Spitzer, Robert J. Saving the Constitution from Lawyers: How Legal Trainingand Law Reviews Distort Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
• 20. Steiner, Eva. French Legal Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
• 21. Whittington, Keith E. “How to Read the Constitution: Self-Government and the Jurisprudence of Originalism.” The Heritage Foundation 5 (2006) // http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2006/05/how-to-read-theconstitution-self-government-and-the-jurisprudence-of-originalism (accessed October 17, 2012).

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10076-012-0009-8