Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2011 | 16 | 16 | 173-188

Article title

Typology of Suburban Communities in Poland

Authors

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The paper presents an attempt to classify new and existing suburban communities in Poland based on spatial patterns and comparisons with suburbs in the United States. Fifteen types of Polish suburban communities are identified in the paper. As large-scale suburban development is a relatively new phenomenon in Poland, most Polish suburban communities will continue to evolve over time and make the transition from one community type to another. An understanding of each type of suburban community may help local governments assist the communities they serve in the process of creating infrastructure and jobs for a growing population.

Publisher

Year

Volume

16

Issue

16

Pages

173-188

Physical description

Dates

published
2011-01-01
online
2011-09-02

Contributors

  • Jagiellonian University, Poland

References

  • Anas, A., Arnott, R. and Small, K. 1997: Urban Spatial Structure, University of California Transportation Center Working Paper, No. 357, Berkeley-Boston: SUNY Buffalo, Boston College, UC Irvine.
  • Bagiński, E. 2000: Wrocław i strefa przymiejska jako układ osadniczy (Wrocław and its suburban zone as a settlement system - in Polish), Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.
  • Berentsen, W., Roosaare, J. and Samara, P. 2000: Suburbanization and landscape change in Connecticut: Repetition of the patterns in Estonia and elsewhere in Central Europe? In: Mander, U. and Jongman, R.H.G. editors, Landscape Perspectives of Land Use Changes, Southhampton, Boston: WIT Press/Computational Mechanics Inc., pp. 131-166.
  • Boustan, L. 2006: Was Postwar Suburbanization ‘White Flight’? Evidence from the Black Migration, Cambridge: Harvard University.
  • Burns, D., Vitvar, T., McDonnell, J., Hassett, J., Duncan, J. and Kendall, C. 2005: Effects of suburban development on runoff generation in the Croton River basin, New York. In: Journal of Hydrology, 311, pp. 266-281.
  • Ford, J. 2009: Smart Growth & Conventional Suburban Development: Which Costs More? An infrastructure case study completed for the EPA, Smart Growth: The Business Opportunity for Developers and Production Builders, Washington.
  • Glaeser, E. and Kahn, M. 2001: Decentralized Employment and the Transformation of the American City, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8117, Cambridge.
  • Glaeser, E. and Kahn, M. 2003: Sprawl and Urban Growth, Harvard University, National Bureau of Economic Research, Tufts University.
  • Gonda-Soroczyńska, E. 2009a: Czy to jeszcze wieś? (Is this still the countryside? - in Polish). In: Polskie Krajobrazy Wiejskie Dawne i Współczesne, Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego, No. 12, Sosnowiec: PTG.
  • Gonda-Soroczyńska, E. 2009b: Przemiany strefy podmiejskiej Wrocławia w ostatnim dziesięcioleciu (Changes in the suburban zone of Wrocław in the last decade - in Polish). In: Infrastruktura i ekologia terenów wiejskich, Nr 4, Kraków: PAN, pp. 149-165.
  • Goodwill, J. and Hendricks, S. 2002: Building Transit Oriented Development in Established Communities, Tampa: Center for Urban Transportation Research, USF.
  • Główny Urząd Statystyczny (GUS) - Central Statistical Office of Poland (Warsaw):
  • Jakóbczyk-Gryszkiewicz, J. 1998: Przeobrażenia strefy podmiejskiej dużych miast: studium porównawcze strefy podmiejskiej Warszawy, Łodzi, Krakowa, Łódź: Uniwersytet Łódzki.
  • Kim, S. 2007: Changes in the Nature of Urban Spatial Structure in the United States, 1890-2000. In: Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 47, No. 2, Washington: Washington University, NBER, pp. 273-287.
  • Lewyn, M. 2006: New Urbanist Zoning for Dummies. In: Alabama Law Review, Vol. 58:2:257, Jacksonville: Florida Coastal School of Law.
  • Lisowski, A. and Grochowski, M. 2008: Procesy Suburbanizacji. Uwarunkowania, formy i konsekwencje (Suburbanization Processes. Determinants, Forms and Consequences - in Polish). In: Ekspertyzy do Koncepcji Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju 2008-2033, KPZK - Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, T. 1, pp. 217-280.
  • Mieszkowski, P. and Mills, E. 1993: The Causes of Metropolitan Suburbanization. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 135-147.
  • Oferty.net, online real estate database for Poland:
  • Persky, J. and Wiewel, W. 1996: Central City and Suburban Development: Who Pays and Who Benefits? College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, Publisher: Great Cities Institute.
  • Szymańska, D., Grzelak-Kostulska, E. and Hołowiecka, B. 2009: Polish Towns and the Changes in Their Areas and Population Densities. In: Szymańska, D. and Grzelak-Kostulska, E. editors, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, No. 11, Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Scientific Publishing House, pp. 15-30.
  • Winling, D. 2006: Out of the Congested Zone: Annexation in Detroit, 1915-1926, Urban History Association Conference, Phoenix: ASU.
  • Zborowski, A. 2005: Przemiany struktury społeczno-przestrzennej regionu miejskiego w okresie realnego socjalizmu i transformacji ustrojowej (na przykładzie Krakowa) (Social and Spatial Changes in Urban Regions under Socialism and during the Transition - in Polish), Kraków: Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Jagiellonian University.
  • Zwick, S. 2009: Case Studies for Transit Oriented Development, Proposition 207-related paper, Publisher: Reconnecting America, Phoenix.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_v10089-011-0021-x
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.