Maltese Youth and the Environment: A Qualitative Study

• Authors: Mark Mifsud
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The present study attempted to highlight the main processes of the acquisition and development of various environmental perspectives and puts forward suggestions on how youth can be better addressed in the light of the research findings. The present paper involved the use of a number of focus groups and a contextual study that examined the development of environmental education on the Maltese islands, considered the main local environmental issues and subsequently analysed the main causes and mechanisms that have shaped the development of the local environment and the Maltese people. The present research identifies a number of geographic and socio economic trends which have a strong impact on young people's knowledge. The results indicate relatively low positive behaviour towards the environment, and the main issue appears to be what is seen as the ‘costs’ involved in performing such pro-environmental actions. A pervasive sense of futility in environmental actions emerged with issues relating to the Maltese government and politics being the main reasons for this feeling. An environmental perspectives model was designed employing the technique of graphical display. The model illustrates how young people perceive the future of the Maltese environment through three Cartesian axes.

Keywords

EN

environmental education; attitudes; behaviour; youth

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 110-129

Dates

published

2010-01-01

online

2011-02-21

Contributors

author

Mark Mifsud

• University of Malta, Malta

References

• Barrett, B. F. D., & Kuroda, A. (2002). Ecological modernisation, environmental knowledge and societal change: Attitude and behaviour of young people in Japan. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(3), 237-261.
• Boissevain, J. (1990). Why do the Maltese ask so few questions? Education, 3(4), 16-18.
• Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H., & Yencken, D. (1999). ‘If it doesn't directly affect you, you don't think about it’: A qualitative study of young people's environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 1, 95-114.
• Gambro, J. S., & Switzky, H. N. (1996). A national survey of high school students' environmental knowledge. Journal of Environmental Education, (27)3, 28-33.[Crossref]
• Gambro, J. S., & Switzky, H. N. (1999). Variables associated with American high school students knowledge of environmental issues related to energy and pollution. Journal of Environmental Education, (30)2, 15-22.[Crossref]
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, Aldine.
• Hampel, B., Holdsworth, R., & Boldero, J. (1996). The impact of parental work experience and education on environmental knowledge, concern and behaviour among adolescents. Environmental Education Research, (2)3, 287-300.
• Hsu, S. J. (2004). The effects of an environmental education program on responsible environmental behaviour and associated environmental literacy variables in Taiwanese college students. Journal of Environmental Education, (35)2, 37-48.[Crossref]
• Hsu, S. J., & Roth, R. E. (1996). An assessment of environmental knowledge and attitudes held by community leaders in the Hualien area of Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Education, (28)1, 25-32.
• Ivy, T. G. C., Lee, C. K., & Chuan, G. K. (1998). A survey of environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of students in Singapore. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, (7), 3, 181-202.
• Kaplowitz, M. D., & Levine, R. (2005). How environmental knowledge measures up at a Big Ten University. Environmental Education Research, (11)2, 143-160.
• Krueger, R., (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Kuhlemeier, H., Huub, V. D. B., & Nijs, L. (1999). Environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviour in Dutch secondary education. Journal of Environmental Education, (30)2, 4-15.[Crossref]
• Makki, M. H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Boujaoude, S. (2003). Lebanese secondary school students' environmental knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, (9)1, 21-33.
• Mallia, A., Briguglio, M., Ellul, A. E., & Formosa, S, (2002). Physical background, demography, tourism, mineral resources and land use. In State of the Environment Report for Malta (pp. 39-162). Ministry for Home Affairs and the Environment.
• Ministry of Education. (2004). National youth policy. Valletta, Malta.
• Mogenson, F., & Nielsen, K., (2001). Students' knowledge about environmental matters and their belief in their own action possibilities. Journal of Environmental Education, 33(1), 33-35.[Crossref]
• Pawlowski, A. (1996). Perception of environmental problems by young people in Poland. Environmental Education Research, (2)3, 279-285.
• Said, A. M., Yahaya, N., & Ahmadun, F. (2007). Environmental comprehension and participation of Malaysian secondary school students. Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 7-31.
• Sivek, D. J. (2002). Environmental sensitivity among Wisconsin High school students. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 155-170.
• Thapa, B., (2001). Environmental concern: A comparative analysis between students in recreation and Park Management and other departments. Environmental Education Research, 7(1), 39-53.
• Tuncer, G., Ertepinar, H., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S., (2005). Environmental attitudes of young people in Turkey: Effects of school type and gender. Environmental Education Research, (11)2, 215-233.
• UNCED. (1992). Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. New York: United Nations.
• Vaughn, S., Schumm S. J., & Sinagub J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. London: Sage Publications.
• Volk, T. L., & Cheak, M. J., (2003). The effects of an environmental education program on students, parents, and community. Journal of Environmental Education, (34)4, 12-25.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10099-009-0058-6