Management of Contracting Public Services and its Quality in Slovakia

• Authors: Juraj Nemec , Beáta Mikušová Meričková , Zuzana Vozárová
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Contracting services in the public sector with private for-profit and non-profit firms is one of the most prevalent types of alternative service-delivering arrangements. Concerning the positive potential of contracting, the relevant literature proposes that contracting may, but need not, improve individual choice, cost-effectiveness and the quality of delivery, equity and to some extent also expenditure control. On the other hand, many authors provide important arguments describing weak points of contracting and some risks connected with contracting services in the public sector. The main “internal” reason why contracting does not produce the expected results and even creates perverse effects in the effectiveness and quality of contracted services, is the improper implementation of contract management. This paper seeks to answer the question of what factors account for success in contracting for services in the public sector by testing the relationship between contracting performance and selected factors connected with contract management such as competition, exante evaluation of bidders, contract monitoring, contract duration, contract payment and joint problem solving and communication between the principal and the agent. This study uses a quantitative approach to investigate the research question and to analyze the original collected survey data from our own research. The research was supported by the Czech Grant Agency projects P403 / 12 / 0366 and P403 / 10 / 1892

Keywords

EN

Contracting; outsourcing; public sector; principal; agent; contract management

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 55-74

Dates

published

2012-07-01

online

2013-05-16

Contributors

author

Juraj Nemec

• Professor, Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic and Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia

author

Beáta Mikušová Meričková

• Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia and Banking Institute, Prague, Czech Republic

author

Zuzana Vozárová

• PhD student, Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia and Banking Institute, Prague, Czech Republic

References

• Arrow, K. J. 1985. “The Economics of Agency.” In J. W. Pratt and R. J. Zeckhauser (eds). Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 37-51.
• Bailey, S. J. 1999. Public Sector Economics. London: Macmillan.
• Balažova, E. 2006. Benchmarking služieb miestnej samosprávy na Slovensku. Bratislava: TIS.
• Beblavy, M. and E. Sičakova-Beblava. 2006 Inštitucionálne dilemy pri zabezpečovaníverejných služieb. Prešov: TIS.
• Bel, G. and A. Costas. 2006. “Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty ? An Empirical Analysis on Privatization of Solid Waste Collection.” The Journal of PolicyReform 9 (1), 1-24.
• Brown, T. L. and M. Potoski. 2003 “Contract-Management Capacity in Municipal and County Governments.” Public Administration Review 63, 153-164.[WoS][Crossref]
• Brudney, J. L., S. Fernandez, J. E. Ryu and D. S. Wright. 2005. “Exploring and Explaining Contracting Out: Patterns Among the American States.” Journal ofPublic Administration Research and Theory 15, 393-419.
• Bunčak, J., R. Džambazovič, A. Hrabovska and J. Sopoci. 2008. Názory občanov nabudúcnosť Slovenska. Bratislava: EU SAV.
• Cooper, P. J. 2003. Governing by Contract. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
• DeHoog, R. H. 1990. “Competition, Negotiation, or Cooperation: Three Models for Service Contracting.” Administration and Society 22, 317-340.
• Engelbeck, R. M. 2004. Using Metrics to Manage Contractor Performance. Graduate School of Business & Public Policy at the Naval Postgraduate School. Available at http://www.acquisitionresearch.org/_files/FY2004/NPS-CM-04-011.pdf (last accessed 15 April 2012).
• Epstein, P. D. 1984. Using Performa nce Measurement in Local Government. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc.
• Ferris, J. and P. Graddy. 1996. Institutional Economics and Government Contracting:Lessons for the New Public Management. Paper prepared for the conference on The New Public Management in International Perspective, Institute of Public Finance and Fiscal Law, 11-13 July in St Gallen, Switzerland. Available at http://www.inpuma.net/research/conference/Papers/fergrad.doc (last accessed 15 April 2012).
• Greene, J. D. 2002. Cities and Privatization: Prospects for the New Century. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Hefetz, A. and M. Warner. 2004. “Privatization and its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public AdministrationResearch and Theory 14, 171-190.
• Hirsch, W. Z. 1991. Privatizing Government Services: An Economic Analysis of Contractingby Local Governments. Los Angeles: Institute of Industrial Relations, Publications Centre, University of California.
• Hodge, G. A. 2000. Privatization: An International Review of Performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Kamerman, S. B. and A. J. Kahn. 1989. Privatization and the Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Kettl, D. F. 1993. Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
• Lane, J. E. 2000. New Public Management. London: Routledge Taylor Francis Group. Lowery, D. 1998. “Consumer Sovereignty and Quasi-Market Failure.” Journal ofPublic Administration Research and Theory 8 (2), 137-172.
• Majlingova, L. and V. Šagat. 2006. “Zabezpečovanie služieb miestnou samospravou.” Acta Aerarii Publici 3 (2), 34-41.
• Marlin, J. T. 1984. Contracting Municipal Services: A Guide for Purchase from thePrivate Sector. New York: Wiley.
• Macneil, I. R. 1978. “Contracts: Adjustments of Long-Term Economic Relations under Classical, Neoclassical and Relational Contract Law.” NorthwesternUniversity Law Review 72, 855-905.
• Meričkova, B. 2010. “Faktory efektivnosti efektivnosti kontrahovania služieb vo verejnom sektore.” In Květa Kubatova (ed.). Teoretické a praktické aspektyveřejných financií. Praha: Vysoka škola ekonomicka Praha, Oeconomica.
• Meričkova, B., J. Nemec and F. Ochrana. 2008. “Introducing Benchmarking in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Processes, Problems and Lessons.” Public ManagementReview 10 (5), 673-684.[WoS]
• Meričkova, B., J. Nemec, E. Sičakova-Beblava and M. Beblavy. 2010 Kontrahovanieslužieb vo verejnom sektore. Bratislava: Transparency International Slovensko.
• Meričkova, B., J. Nemec and L. Vitek. 2005. “Contracting-out at Local Government Level: Theory and Selected Evidence from Czech and Slovak Republics.” PublicManagement Review 7 (4), 638-647.
• More, T. M. 1984. “The New Economics of Organization.” American Journal of PoliticalScience 4 (28), 739-777.
• Ochrana, F. 2007. Veřejné služby: jejich poskytování, zadávaní a hodnocení. Praha: Ekopress.
• Ovretveit, J. 1995. Purchasing for Health. London: Oxford University Press.
• Pavel, J. 2007. Ekonomické aspekty veřejných zakázek. Praha: Vysoka škola ekonomicka v Praze.
• Pavel, J. 2006. Efektivnost a transparentnost obecních obchodních spolecností. Transparency International Czech Republic. Available at http://www.transparency.cz/pdf/vz_obecni_firmy_pavel.pdf (last accessed 15 April 2012).
• Pavel, J. and E. Beblava. 2008. “Transparentnosť trhu verejneho obstaravania.” Ekonomickýčasopis 56 (2), 168-181.
• Pollitt, Ch. and G. Bouckaert. 2000. Public Management Reform: A ComparativeAnalysis. London: Oxford University Press.
• Prager, J. 1994. “Contracting Out Government Services: Lessons from the Private Sector.” Public Administration Review 54 (2), 176-184. Pratt, J. W. and R. J. Zeckhauser. 1986. “Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business.” Journal of Economic Literature 24 (4), 1788-1789.[Crossref]
• Rehfuss, J. A. 1989. Contracting Out in Government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Romzek, B. S. and J. M. Johnston. 2002. “Effective Contract Implementation and Management: A Preliminary Model.” Journal of Public Administration Researchand Theory 12, 423-453.
• Savas, E. S. 1987. Privatisation: The Key to Government. New York: Chatman House.
• Sclar, E. D. 2000. You Don’t Always Get What You Pay For: The Economics of Privatization. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
• Šebo, J. and Š. Macejak. 2008. Záujmové organizácie a lobing. Banska Bystrica: Ekonomicka fakulta UMB.
• Seidenstat, P. 1999. Contracting Out Government Services. Westport: Praeger.
• Shetterly, D. R. 1998. “The Influence of Contract Designs on Contractor Performance.” Public Performance & Management Review 24 (1), 53-68.
• Stiglitz, J. E. 1997. Economics of the Public Sector. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10110-012-0003-2