PL EN


2012 | 5 | 2 | 89-120
Article title

Party Patronage and State Politicisation in The Post- Communist Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: A Game Theory Approach

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This article aims at offering a framework for analysing party patronage and state politicisation based on game-theoretic reasoning. It is argued that in order to reveal the main causal mechanisms behind these phenomena, one can focus on the cooperation between political parties analysis based on the model of prisoner’s dilemma. The article identifies four sets of obstacles to party cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe: unstable and polarised party systems; “the rules of the game” legitimising party patronage; dense party networks and their building through patronage; and insufficient regulation and weak enforcement of the merit principle in state administrations. The influence of these causal mechanisms in the post-communist countries can be explored through historical process-tracing and other methods. Finally, the article proposes several country-specific hypotheses for the empirical study of party patronage and state politicisation in Lithuania
Keywords
Publisher
Year
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
89-120
Physical description
Dates
published
2012-12-01
online
2013-05-16
Contributors
References
  • Armingeon, Klaus, David Weisstanner, Sarah Engler, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlene Gerber and Philipp Leimgruber. 2012. Comparative Political Data Set III.
  • Available at http://www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/team/klaus_armingeon/comparative_political_data_sets/index_ger.html (last accessed 30 August 2012).
  • Beblavy, Misroslav, Emilia Sicakova-Beblava and Darina Ondrusova. 2012. “Understanding Reasons and Implications of Agency Management ‘Politicization’: Parties vs Ministers.” Paper presented at the Fifth Trans-European Dialogue in Public Administration “The Politics of Agency Governance”, 1 - 3 February, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Bennich-Bjorkman, Li. 2006. “Building Post-Communist States: Political Corruption and Strategies of Party Formation in Estonia and Latvia.” In Sven Eliaeson (ed.). Building Democracy and Civil Society East of the Elbe: Essays inHonour of Edmund Mokrzycki. New York: Routledge, 288 - 305.
  • Bouckaert, Geert. 2009. “Public Sector Reform in CEE Countries: An Introduction.” In Geert Bouckaert, Juraj Nemec, Vitalis Nakrošis, Gyorgy Hajnalm and Kristiina Tonnisson (eds). Public Management Reforms in Central andEastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press, 13 - 24.
  • Drengsgaard, Linda and Ole Hersted Hansen. 2004. State of the State in Lithuania.
  • Demstar Research Report No. 19, University of Aarhus. Available at http:// www.demstar.dk (last accessed 30 May 2012).
  • Economist, The. 2012. Putsch-up Job. 14 July. Available at http://www.economist.com/node/21558575 (last accessed 30 August 2012).
  • EurActiv. 2012. Barroso: Romania Has Shaken EU Trust. 19 July. Available at http:// www.euractiv.com/central-europe/video-barroso-romania-shaken-eunews-514013 (last accessed 30 August 2012).
  • Geddes, Barbara. 1996. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley, London & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennet. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Developmentin the Social Sciences. MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England.
  • Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gudžinskas, Liutauras. 2012. Pokomunistinių valstybių ir jų gerovės režimų transformacija:Baltijos šalių lyginamoji analizė [Transformation of postcommunist states and their welfare regimes: comparative analysis of Baltic countries]. PhD dissertation. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press. [in Lithuanian] Gwiazda, Anna. 2008. “Party Patronage in Poland: The Democratic Left Alliance and Law and Justice Compared”. East European Politics & Societies 22, 802 - 27.
  • Hanley, Sean. 2008. “Re-stating Party Development in Central and Eastern Europe ?” Czech Sociological Review 44(6), 1155 - 1176.
  • Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transition.” World Politics 50(2), 203 - 234.
  • Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kray and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2011. Worldwide GovernanceIndicators 1996 - 2010. Available at http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/resources.htm (last accessed 30 May 2012).
  • Kemahlioglu, Ozge. 2012. Agents or Bosses ? Patronage and Intra-Party Politics inArgentina and Turkey. Colchester, Essex: ECPR Press.
  • Kitschelt, Herbert, Zdenka Mansfeldova, Radoslaw Markowski and Gabor Toka. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kopecky, Petr. 2006. “Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of Symbiosis.” Journal of Communist studies and Transition Politics 22(3), 251 - 273.
  • Kopecky, Petr and Peter Mair. 2011. “Party Patronage in Contemporary Europe: Principles and Practices.” EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2011 / 41. Available at http://www.eui.eu/Projects/EUDO/Documents/2011/eudoworkingpaperkopeckymair.pdf (last accessed 30 May 2012).
  • Kopecky, Petr, Peter Mair and Maria Spirova (eds). 2012. Party Patronage and PartyGovernment in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kopecky, Petr, Gerardo Scherlis and Maria Spirova. 2008. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Party Patronage.” Political Concepts, Committee on Concepts andMethods Working Paper Series 25 (September), 1 - 18.
  • Kopecky, Petr and Maria Spirova. 2011. “‘Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.” West European Politics 34(5), 897 - 921.[Crossref]
  • Lewis, Paul. 2006. “Party Systems in Post-Communist Central Europe: Patterns of Stability and Consolidation.” Democratization 13(4), 562 - 583.
  • Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approach and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2011. “The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe aft er Accession.” Governance 24(2), 231 - 260.
  • Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2009a. Post-Accession Sustainability of Civil Service Reformin Central and Eastern Europe. Paris: OECD-SIGMA Publications.
  • Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2009b. “Varieties of Legacies: A Critical Review of Legacy Explanations of Public Administration Reform in East Central Europe.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75(3), 509 - 528.
  • Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2008. “The Changing Colours of the Post-Communist State: The Politicisation of the Senior Civil Service in Hungary.” EuropeanJournal of Political Research 47, 1 - 33.
  • Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik and Tim Veen. 2012. “Governing the Post-Communist State: Government Alternation and Senior Civil Service Politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 28(1), 4 - 22.
  • Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik and Kutsal Yesilkagit. 2011. “Differential Legacy Effects: Three Propositions on the Impact of Administrative Traditions on Public Administration Reform in Europe East and West.” Journal of European PublicPolicy 18(2), 311 - 322.
  • Nakrošis, Vitalis and Mantas Budraitis. 2012. “Longitudinal change in Lithuanian agencies: 1990 - 2010”. International Journal of Public Administration 35, 820 - 831.
  • Nakrošis, Vitalis and Žilvinas Martinaitis (eds). 2011. Lithuanian Agencies and OtherPublic Sector Organisations: Organisation, Autonomy, Control and Performance. Vilnius: Vilnius University.
  • Nakrošis, Vitalis and Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling. 2009. “Modernising the Lithuanian Civil Service.” Unpublished paper.
  • Norkus, Zenonas. 2012. On Baltic Slovenia and Adriatic Lithuania. Budapest: Central European University Press.
  • Norkus, Zenonas. 2011. “Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Post-Communist Development in the Comparative Perspective.” In Marju Lauristin (ed.). EstonianHuman Development Report 2010 / 2011: Baltic Way(s) of Human Development:Twenty Years On. Tallinn: Eesti Koostoogu, 22 - 30.
  • Nowak, Martin and Roger Highfield. 2011. SuperCooperators: Altruism, Evolution,and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. New York: Free Press.
  • O’Dwyer, Conor. 2006. Runaway State-Building: Patronage Politics and DemocraticDevelopment. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
  • OECD / SIGMA. 2003. Lithuania: Public Service and the Administrative FrameworkAssessment. OECD / SIGMA.
  • Osborne, Martin J. 2004. An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ostrom, Elinor. 2011. “Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework”. The Policy Studies Journal 39(1), 7 - 27.
  • Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford.
  • Palidauskaitė, Jolanta. 2011. “Retrospektyvus žvilgsnis į etikos problemas Lietuvos valstybės tarnyboje: naujos problemos, jų turinys ar raiškos formos ?” [Retrospective look at the problems of ethics in the Lithuanian public service: new problems, their content and forms of expression ?] Politologija 4(64), 39 - 72. [in Lithuanian] Peters, B. Guy and John Pierre (eds). 2004. Politicization of the Civil Service in ComparativePerspective: The Quest for Control. London: Routledge.
  • Pettai, Vello, Daunis Auers and Ainė Ramonaitė. 2011. “Political Development.” In Marju Lauristin (ed.). Estonian Human Development Report 2010 / 2011: BalticWay(s) of Human Development: Twenty Years On. Tallinn: Eesti Koostoogu.
  • Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative andQuantitative Strategies. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. Ramonaitė, Ainė. 2008. “Changing Nature of Partisanship in a Post-Communist Society: Comparing ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Parties in Lithuania.” Lithuanian PoliticalScience Yearbook 2007, 91 - 110.
  • Rose, Richard and Neil Munro. 2009. Parties and Elections in New European Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Schimmelfennig, Frank and Ulrich Sedelmeier (eds). 2005. The Europeanization ofCentral and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Steinberg, Paul F. 2007. “Causal Assessment in Small-N Policy Studies”. The PolicyStudies Journal 35(2), 181 - 204.
  • Valstybės tarnybos departamentas prie VRM [Civil Service Department under the Ministry of the Interior]. 2007. Valstybės tarnybos įstatymo ir su juo susijusiųteisės aktų taikymo ir įgyvendinimo ataskaita už 2006 m. Vilnius [2006 report on the application and implementation of the Civil Service Law and the legal acts related to it]. Available at http://www.vtd.lt/index.php?302204322 (last accessed 30 May 2012).
  • Verheijen, Tony and David Coombes (eds). 1998. Innovations in Public Management:Perspectives from East and West Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Willerton, John P. 2009 [1992]. Patronage and the Politics in the USSR. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • World Bank. 2006. Administrative Capacity in the New EU Member States: The Limitsof Innovation ? Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_v10110-012-0007-y
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.