Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2012 | 47 | 2-3 | 27-39

Article title

The Middle English Suffix -Ish: Reasons for Decline in Productivity

Authors

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The aim of the present paper is to investigate the reasons for the significant decline in both the frequency and productivity of the suffix -ish in Middle English. The major factors responsible seem to be the growing popularity of the of + Noun phrases as well as the competition among -ish and other suffixes. The analysis will be preceded with the introduction of some essential facts concerning the semantic development and productivity of the OE suffix -isc in Middle English.

Keywords

Publisher

Year

Volume

47

Issue

2-3

Pages

27-39

Physical description

Dates

published
2012-06-01
online
2013-03-27

Contributors

author
  • Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

References

  • Bosworth, Joseph - T. Northcote Toller 1898-1921 [1964] An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Glasgow - New York - Toronto: Oxford University Press.
  • Cameron, Angus - Ashley Crandell Amos - Antonette diPaolo Healey 2003 The Dictionary of Old English: A to F on CD-ROM. Toronto: University of Toronto.
  • Ciszek, Ewa 2002 “ME -lich(e)/-ly”, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 38:105-129. 2008a Word derivation in Early Middle English. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang. 2008b “On competition between OE -estre and OF -esse in Early Middle English”, KwartalnikNeofilolgiczny 55: 23-31. in press “The semantic development and productivity of the OE suffix -isc in Middle English”, Proceedings of The Sixth International Conference on Middle English (ICOME6), Cambridge, 24 - 26 July 2008.
  • Dalton-Puffer, Christiane 1996 The French influence on Middle English morphology: A corpus-based study of derivation. Berlin - New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Dalton-Puffer, Christiane - Claire Cowie 2000 “Diachronic word-formation and studying changes in productivity over time: Theoretical and methodological considerations”, in: Javier E. Diaz Vera (ed.), 410-437.
  • Diaz Vera, Javier E. (ed.) 2000 A changing world of words. Studies in English historical lexicography, lexicologyand semantics. Amsterdam - New York: Rodopi.
  • Fisiak, Jacek 1965 Morphemic structure of Chaucer’s English. University, Alabama: University of Alabama Press. 1968 [2004] A short grammar of Middle English. (6th edition.) Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  • Hogg, Richard (ed.) 1992 The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 1: The beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Horobin, Simon in press “Traditional English? Chaucerian methods of word-formation?”, NeuphilologischeMitteilungen 110/2: 141-157.
  • Jespersen, Otto 1942 A modern English grammar on historical principles. Vol. 6: Morphology. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Kastovsky Dieter 1992 “Semantics and vocabulary”, in: Richard Hogg (ed.), 290-408.
  • Kurath, Hans et al. (eds.) 1954- 2001 Middle English dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Marchand, Hans 1969 Categories and types of Present-day English word formation: A synchronicdiachronicapproach. München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuch-handlung.
  • MED Online = Middle English dictionary. <http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/m/med/> Murray, J.A.H. - Henry Bradley - W.A. Craigie - C.T. Onions. 1928 [1989] The Oxford English dictionary. (2nd edition.) Oxford: Clarendon.
  • OED online = The Oxford English dictionary.<http://lib.amu.edu.pl/bazy/filologia.php> Wright, Joseph - Elizabeth Mary Wright 1914 Old English grammar. London - Edinburgh: Oxford University Press.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_v10121-012-0002-z
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.