PL EN


2012 | 47 | 4 | 81-95
Article title

A Testimonie’S Stance: Editorial Positioning in Ælfric’S Sermo in die Pascae

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Being one of the first texts to reproduce in printed form the Anglo-Saxon characters, A Testimonie of Antiquity, basically an edition of Ælfric’s “Sermo in Die Pascae”, has been the object of philological studies. Its subject matter related to the Anglican reform has also been analysed from a religious perspective. This article intends to focus on a different aspect, the reason for the text’s success evidenced in its several reproductions and content discussions, which have reached the 20th century. We claim the main credit for this success is to be given to its editors and, therefore, a pragmatic analysis concentrating on stance and engagement (Hyland 2005, 2009) is an adequate study frame. The conclusions will reveal how although there are quantifiable markers that facilitated the positive reception of the text, there were other elements (closer to modern writing implements) the authors utilized to achieve their final objective.
Keywords
Publisher
Year
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
81-95
Physical description
Dates
published
2012-12-01
online
2013-03-27
Contributors
  • University of La Laguna, Spain
References
  • Berkhout, Carl T. - Milton McC. Gatch (eds.) 1982 Anglo-Saxon scholarship. Boston: G. K. Hall
  • Biber, Douglas - Stig Johansson - Geoffrey Leech - Susan Conrad - Edward Finegan 1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
  • Magennis, Hugh - Mary Swan 2009 A companion to Ælfric. Leiden: Brill.
  • Bækken, Bjørg 2002 “Yet this fillie doth many times assault the brauest minds: Affirmative declarative do in 17th-Century English”, Nordic Journal of English Studies 1/2: 317-337.
  • Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986 Speech genres and other late essays. Texas: Texas University Press.
  • Barton, David 2007 Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Brito, Manuel et al. (eds.) 2007 Insights and bearings: Festschrift for Dr. Juan Sebastian Amador Bedford. La Laguna: Servicio de Publicaciones Universidad de La Laguna
  • Bromwich, John 1962 “The first book printed in Anglo-Saxon types”, Transactions of the Cambridge BibliographicalSociety 3/4: 265-291.
  • Charles, Maggie - Susan Hunston - Diane Pecorari (eds.) 2009 Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse. London: Continuum.
  • Claire, Colin 1976 A history of European printing. London: Academic Press.
  • Clemoes, Peter 1997 Ælfric’s catholic homilies: The first series text. EETS. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Godden, Malcolm 2001 Ælfric’s Catholic Homilies: Introduction, commentary, and glossary. EETS. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Görlach, Manfred 1991 Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Grundy, Lynne. 1991 Books and grace: Ælfric’s theology. King’s College London Medieval Studies VI. London: King’s College.
  • Hyland, Ken 2005 “Stance and engagement; A model of interaction in academic discourse”, DiscourseStudies 7/2: 173-192. 2009 “Corpus informed discourse analysis: the case of academic engagement”, in: Maggie Charles et al. (eds.), 110-128.
  • Hunston, Susan - Geoff Thompson 2003 Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kastovsky, Dieter (ed.) 1991 Historical English syntax. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Kelemen, Erik 1997 “A reexamination of the date of A testimonie of antiquitie, one of the first books printed in Anglo-Saxon types”, ANQ 10/4: 3-10.
  • Leinbaugh, Theodore H. 1982 “Ælfric’s Sermo de sacrificio in die pascae: Anglican polemic in the sixteenth and seventeeth centuries”, in: Carl T. Berkhout - Milton McC. Gatch (eds.), 51-68.
  • Martin, James R. - Peter R.R White 2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Mele-Marrero, Margarita 2003 “Two extremes of English out of the standard: Cant and Old English”, Revista Canariade Estudios Ingleses 46: 85-99 2007 “Blood, Flesh and Word: The importance of language in A testimonie of antiquitie”, in: Manuel Brito et al. (eds.) 95-103.
  • Mele-Marrero, Margarita - Francisco Alonso-Almeida 2011 “The role of the pronouns he and she in seventeenth-century obstetric directives”, Studia Neophilologica 83: 169-181.[WoS]
  • Murphy, Michael 1982 “Antiquary to academic: The progress of Anglo-Saxon scholarship”, in: Carl T.
  • Berkhout - Milton McC. Gatch (eds.), 1-17.
  • Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (ODNB) online 2004 ODNB. Oxford: Oxford University Press. <http://www.oxforddnb.com/> <date of access: 10. 12. 2011>
  • Parker, Mathew - John Josceline c.1566 A testimonie of antiquitie. London: John Day. Facsimile from Early English BooksOnline (EEBO) <http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo> <date of access: 10. 11. 2012>
  • Quintana-Toledo, Elena 2009 “Middle English medical recipes: A metadiscursive approach”, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 45: 21-38.
  • Rissanen, Matti. 1991 “Spoken language and the history of do-periphrasis”, in: Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 321-342.
  • Robinson, Benedict S. 1998 “Darke speech: Mathew Parker and the reforming of history”, The sixteenth centuryJournal 29/4: 1061-1083
  • Sisam, Kenneth 1967 Studies in the history of Old English literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • TAMO 2011 The unabridged Acts and Monuments online or TAMO. HRI Online Publications, Sheffield. <http//www.johnfoxe.org> <date of access: 10. 10. 2011>.
  • Thurston, Herbert. 1907 “Ælfric, Abbot of Eynsham”. The catholic encyclopedia, New York: Robert Appleton Company. <http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01171b.htm> <date of access: 5/01/ 2012>
  • White, Peter R.R. 2003 “Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance”, Text 23/2: 259-284
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_v10121-012-0012-x
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.