Authority in Lowth’S and Priestley’S Prefaces to Their English Grammars

• Authors: Dolores Fernández Martínez
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The eighteenth century was a crucial period in the process of codification of the English language and in the history of English grammar writing (Tieken-Boon van Ostade 2008b). The need for grammars to provide linguistic guidance to the upper social classes, and to those who aspired to belong to them, led to an important increase in the output of English grammars. Since most of the grammar writers were clearly in competition with one another for a share of the market, they turned the prefaces to their grammars into highly persuasive instruments that tried to justify the need for that specific grammar. Priestley’s and Lowth’s grammars epitomized, respectively, the two main trends of grammatical tradition, namely descriptivism and prescriptivism. Taking a critical discourse analysis approach, this paper aims to examine how both writers claimed their authority through the presentation of the different individuals involved in the text, specifically, the author and any potential readers. We will examine how individuals are depicted both as a centre of structure and action through Martin’s (1992) identification systems and Halliday’s (2004 [1985]) transitivity structures. Such an approach fits in with Wicker’s (2006: 79) assessment of prefaces as textual networks of authority in which it is essential to interrogate how the readers who support and influence the texts are represented and addressed.

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Studia Anglica Posnaniensia
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 47
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 97-111

Dates

published

2012-12-01

online

2013-03-27

Contributors

author

Dolores Fernández Martínez

• Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

References

• Baker, Geoff - Ann McGruer (eds.) 2006 Readers, audiences and coteries in Early Modern England. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
• Beal, Joan C. 2004 English in modern times. London: Arnold.
• Berry, Margaret - Christopher Butler - Robin Fawcett - Guowen Huang (eds.) 1996 Meaning and form: Systemic functional interpretations. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
• Cummings, Michael 1995 “A systemic functional approach to the thematic structure of the Old English clause”, in: Ruqaiya Hasan - Peter Howard Fries (eds.), 275-316.
• Chiapello, Eve - Norman Fairclough 2002 “Understanding the new management ideology: A transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism”, Discourse & Society 13/2: 185-208.
• Davies, Martin 1996 “Theme and information until Shakespeare”, in: Margaret Berry et al. (eds.), 113-149.
• Discenza, Nicole Guenther 2001 “Alfred’s verse preface to the Pastoral Care and the chain of authority”, Neophilologus 85/4: 625-633.
• ECCO: Eighteenth Century Collections Online. <http://gale.cengage.co.uk/product-highlights/ history/eighteenth-century-collections-online.aspx> Thomson Gale.
• Fairclough, Norman 1995 Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
• Fairclough, Norman [1989] 2001 Language and power. (2nd edition). London: Longman.
• Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood [1985] 2004 Introduction to functional grammar. (3rd edition). London: Edward Arnold.
• Harbus, Antonina 2007 “Metaphors of authority in Alfred’s Prefaces”, Neophilologus 91: 717-727.[WoS]
• Hasan, Ruqaiya - Peter Howard Fries (eds.) 1995 On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Hickey, Raymond 2010a “Attitudes and concerns in eighteenth-century English”, in: Raymond Hickey (ed.), 1-20.
• Hickey, Raymond (ed.) 2010b Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hodson, Jane 2008 “Joseph Priestley’s two Rudiments of English Grammar: 1761 and 1768”, in: Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), 177-189.
• Lowth, Robert 1762 A short introduction to English Grammar. London: printed by J. Hughs; for A. Millar and R. & J. Dodsley.
• Martin, James R. 1992 English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Priestley, Joseph 1761 The rudiments of English Grammar. London: printed for R. Griffiths.
• Rodríguez-Gil, María Esther 2003 “Ann Fisher, descriptive or prescriptive grammarian?”, Lingüística e Filología 17: 183-203.
• Straaijer, Robin 2009 “Deontic and epistemic modals as indicators of prescriptive and descriptive language in the grammars by Joseph Priestley and Robert Lowth”, in: Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade - Wurff Wim van der (eds.), 57-87. 2011 Joseph Priestly, grammarian. Late Modern English normativism and usage in asociohistorical context. Utrecht: LOT.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10121-012-0013-9