2012 | 18 | 85-110
Article title

A Far-reaching Shift in Argumentation: Parliamentary Debates on (post-)socialist Agricultural Cooperatives in the 1990s

Title variants
Languages of publication
The debate as to whether Slovak post-socialist agricultural cooperatives are cooperatives or not represents one of the focal points of their post-1989 development. The answer to this question determined and/or legitimized the rationale for the legislative framework concerning their post-socialist transformation. This analysis draws mainly on data from the parliamentary debates that preceded the enactment of three pivotal laws. In comparing the debates in 1991/1992 and 1995, the examination focuses on the shift in the argumentation put forward by representatives speaking on behalf of cooperative farms. A dramatic shift in reasoning about the character of cooperative enterprises and appropriate voting rights is interpreted as a pragmatic, effect-oriented action. It is argued that both delicate work with the hybrid nature of post-socialist cooperative farms as well as the initial withholding of cooperative principles contributed to the preservation of the specific kinds of agricultural cooperative, and consequently also large corporate farm, which now exist in Slovakia.
Physical description
  • Bandlerova, A., 2004. ‘Postavenie poľnohospodarskych družstiev na Slovensku’ (‘Situation of the agricultural cooperatives in Slovakia’). In: Regiony-VidiekŽivotneProstredie (Regions-Countryside-Environment), Nitra: Slovenska Poľnohospodarska Univerzita.
  • Bezemer, D. J., 2002. ‘De-collectivization in Czech and Slovak Agriculture: An Institutional Explanation’. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 36(3): 723‒745.
  • Blaas, G., 1995. ‘Agriculture in Slovakia - A Forced Re-Structuring’. Sociologia. Vol. 27 (7‒8): 134‒141.
  • Blaas, G., Buchta, S. and Namerova, I. 1994 The Economic, Legislative, Politicaland Social Policy Context of Slovak Agriculture. Working paper No. 43, Rural Transition Series, University of Liverpool.
  • Csaki, C., Lerman, Z., 1993. ‘Land Reform and the Future Role of Cooperatives in Agriculture in the Former Socialist Countries in Europe’. In: Csaki, C., Kislev, Y. (eds.) Agricultural Cooperatives in Transition. Oxford: Westview Press. pp. 3‒20.
  • Gubová, M., Ambrozyova, M. and E. Baumgartnerova, 2001. Transformaciavlastnickych vzťahov v poľnohospodarskej prvovyrobe po roku 1990 [The transformation of property relations in agricultural production after 1990]. Bratislava: VUEPP.
  • Hann, Ch. M. and the ‘Property Relations’ group (eds.) 2003. The Post-socialistAgrarian Question. Property Relations and the Rural Condition, Halle studies in the anthropology of Eurasia, Munster: LIT Verlag.
  • Kabat, L., Hagedorn, K., 1997. ‘Privatization and de-collectivization policies and resulting structural changes of agriculture in Slovakia’. In Swinnen, J., Buckwell, A. and E. Mathijs (eds.) Agricultural Privatization, Land Reform and FarmRestructuring in Central and Eastern Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 229‒279.
  • Mathijs, E., Swinnen, J. F. M., 1998. ‘The Economics of Agricultural Decollectivization in East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union’. Economic Development andCultural Change. Vol. 47 (1): 1‒26.
  • Meyer, K. E., 2003. Privatisation and Corporate Governance in Eastern Europe: The Emergence of Stakeholder Capitalism. Keynote address, Chemnitz East Forum. 19‒22 March, 2003.
  • Námerová, I., 1997. ‘Contemporary Slovak society and agrarian reform’. HumanAffairs. Vol. 7 (1): 77‒85.
  • Schlüter, A., 2000. Institutional Change in Transition: Restitution, Transformation and Privatisation in Czech Agriculture. Paper presented at the KATO Symposium. Berlin, Germany, 2 - 4 November, 2000.
  • Spicer, A., McDermott, G. A. and B. Kogut, 2000. ‘Entrepreneurship and Privatization in Central Europe: The Tenuous Balance between Destruction and Creation’. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 25 (3): 630‒649.
  • Swain, N., 2007. ‘De-collectivization politics and rural change in Bulgaria, Poland and the former Czechoslovakia’. Social History. Vol. 32 (1): 1‒26.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Swain, N., 1999. ‘Agricultural restitution and co-operative transformation in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia’. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 51 (7): 1199‒1219.
  • Swain, N., 1998. ‘A Framework for Comparing Social Change in the Post-Socialist Countryside’. Eastern European Countryside. Vol. 4: 5‒18.
  • Swinnen, J., Buckwell A. and E. Mathijs (eds.) 1997. Agricultural Privatization,Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Swinnen, J. F. M., Mathijs, E., 1997. ‘Agricultural privatisation, land reform and farm restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe. A comparative analysis’. In: Swinnen, J., Buckwell A. and E. Mathijs (eds.) Agricultural Privatization, Land Reform andFarm Restructuring in Central Europe. Ashgate: Aldershot, pp. 333‒373.
  • Verdery, K., 2003. The Vanishing Hectare. Property and Value in Post-socialistTransylvania. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • VUEPP, 1999. Analyza vyvoja poľnohospodarstva v obdobi rokov 1990‒1998 (An analysis of agricultural development 1990‒1998). Bratislava: VUEPP.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.