PL EN


2011 | 51 | 1 | 25-39
Article title

From Grass Roots to World Class (A Strategy for Delivering Physical Activity)

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
During the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, the Hungarian sports team's performance was worse than expected by most of the Hungarian people and the leaders of the Hungarian sports establishment. The Hungarian athletes returned home with a much lower medal tally than in previous decades. More than two years have elapsed since the Olympic Games, but instead of analysing the real reasons for the poor performance, most of the debates in Hungary are about whether we will restore our reputation by taking 8-10 gold medals in the 2012 London Olympics.People in the United Kingdom are also full of hope for a great medal tally in London, not just because of the "home team advantage" but also by reason of the UK's outstanding performance in 2008. The British team finished fourth in the final medal table at the Beijing Olympic Games despite their poor performance one-and-half decades ago in Atlanta, surprising not just the British but also the whole world. By this time, the British strategy was to invest not just in elite sports but also in grass-roots participation sports. If Hungary wants to enhance its elite sports, it must engage in similar changes. It is clear from the latest data that the Hungarian XXI Sports Strategy's aim of making Hungary a sporting nation seems an illusion. Participation sports, which are the foundation of national sporting success and provide the future talents for the elite sports sector, are in need of urgent and substantive reform.By means of secondary analyses and document analyses this article discusses the current state of British sport using the latest data. It then examines recent reforms in English participation sports as well as the latest sports strategy in England and its objectives. In all this, it makes comparison with what is happening in Hungary. The upshot is that Hungary and Britain differ at many points throughout the whole process, from strategy planning to implementation. These contrasts explain the differences in the effectiveness of the British and Hungarian processes. We hope that the outcome of this examination of the efficient Western European process and its comparison with the unsuccessful Hungarian system will assist those responsible for the development of participation sports and elite sports in Hungary.
Publisher
Year
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
25-39
Physical description
Dates
published
2011-06-01
online
2011-06-21
Contributors
author
  • Semmelweis University Budapest, Hungary
author
  • Semmelweis University Budapest, Hungary
References
  • Audit Commission (2002). Sport and Recreation: Learning from audit, inspection and research, London: Audit Commission.
  • Audit Commission (2006). Public sport and recreation services, National report. London: Audit Commission.
  • DCMS/Strategy Unit (2002). Game Plan: A strategy for delivering the Government's sport and physical activity objectives, London: Strategy Unit
  • Da Costa, L., Miragaya, A. (2002). Search of Experiences and Trends of Sport for All Worldwide. In L. Da Costa, A. Miragaya (Eds.), Worldwide Experiences and Trends in Sport for All (pp. 15-31). Aachen: Meyer und Meyer Verlag.
  • Downward, P., Dawson, A., Dejonghe, T. (2009). Sports Economics Theory, Evidence and Policy. Elsevier Ltd.
  • Edginton, C., Coles, R., McClelland, M. (2003). Leisure Basic Concepts. Reston: VA AALR.
  • Földesiné, Sz. Gy., Gál, A. (2008). Választút előtt a sportpolitika. Magyar Sporttudományi Szemle, 2, 4-10.
  • Gallov, R. (2007). Sport XXI. Nemzeti Sportstratégia. Magyar Edző, 3, 45-48.
  • Gáldi G. (2004). Szabadidőstruktúra és fizikai rekreáció Magyarországon 1963-20 00 között, életmód-időmérleg vizsgálatok tükrében. PhD értekezés, Semmelweis Egyetem Doktori Iskola.
  • Gratton, C., Taylor, P. (1991). Sport Participation in Britain: An investigation into the Changing Demand for Sport. Manchester: Polytechnic Working Paper.
  • Gratton, C., Taylor, P. (2000). Economics of Sport and Recreation. London: E. and F. N. Spon.
  • Háttéranyag a sport XXI. Nemzeti Sportstratégiájához (2005). A Nemzeti Sporttanács módosító javaslattételei után (átdolgozott háttéranyag).
  • Király, I. A. (2010). A szabadidősport szerepe az angol nemzeti sportstratégiában; a szabadidősport gazdaságtani elemzése. Szakdolgozat. Budapest: Semmelweis Egyetem TestneveléSi és Sporttudományi Kar.
  • Kovács, T. A. (2007). A rekreáció kultúrája. Magyar Sporttudományi Szemle, 8, 30, 13-24.
  • Robinson, L. (2004). Managing public sport and leisure services. London: Routledge.
  • Sárközy, T. (2010). Sportjog, a 2004-es sporttörvény magyarázata (második, hatályosított kiadás). Budapest: HVG-ORAC Lap- és Könyvkiadó Kft.
  • Sport England (2004). The Framework for Sport in England. London: Sport England.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_v10141-011-0003-y
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.