The Political Meaning of the Right and the Privatization of the Good

• Authors: Piotr Andryszczak
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In today's philosophical and political world we come across an influential current within liberalism called procedural. It faces the problem of building a just society by proposing a formula: the priority of the right over the good. It can be easily found in Rawls's A Theory of Justice which starts from the original position which means that individuals, behind the veil of ignorance, do not know anything about their social location, talents and their own conceptions of the good. Because of such ignorance they would constitute the just society. It would be regulated by two principles of justice, chosen behind the veil of ignorance and reflecting the priority of the right over the good. Nevertheless Rawls understood that this conception could be accepted only by Liberals because it represents an example of a comprehensive doctrine. Therefore he reinterpreted his conception and presented it as political in his Political Liberalism. It has three features: it is worked out for the basic structure of a constitutional democratic regime; it does not depend for its justification on any particular comprehensive doctrine; and, it is formulated in terms of two fundamental ideas implicit in the public culture of a democratic society (the ideas of society as a fair system of cooperation, and of persons viewed as free and equal). Due to this reinterpretation, the justification of his principles of justice proceeds from what is held in common and leads to an agreement based on "an overlapping consensus of reasonable comprehensive doctrines". In this way the good becomes something strictly private and completely absent in the public sphere. Such position is obviously very controversial but a critical approach to it will be a subject of another paper.

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: E-Theologos. Theological revue of Greek Catholic Theological Faculty
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 2
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 15-25

Dates

published

2011-04-01

online

2011-04-29

Contributors

author

Piotr Andryszczak

• The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Cracow

References

• RAWLS, J.: Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory: The Dewey Lectures 1980, "Journal of Philosophy", 77 (1980), pp. 515-572.[WoS]
• RAWLS, J.: Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
• RAWLS, J.: A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.
• ANDRYSZCZAK, P.: Liberalizm polityczny - niespełniona obietnica, "Analecta Cracoviensia" 41 (2009), pp. 7-21.
• ANDRYSZCZAK, P.: Słuszność a dobro w liberalizmie, "Analecta Cracoviensia" 38-39 (2006-2007), pp. 77-88.
• FREEMAN, S. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
• MULHALL, S. - SWIFT, A.: Liberals and Communitarians, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
• POGGE, T. W.: John Rawls, München: C. H. Beck, 1994.
• SANDEL, M. J.: Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
• SANDEL, M. J.: The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self, in: S. Avineri, A de-Shalit (ed.), Communitarianism and Individualism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 12-28.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10154-011-0002-5