Humanistic Paradigms of Education in the Postmodern Vision

• Authors: Martin Šarkan , Rastislav Nemec
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This study portrays the present social trends of the educational system against the background of the transformation of the social institutions that emerge as a result of the general changes to the social paradigm. These transformations have a direct impact on questions over classical humanistic ideals and educational goals relating to the social perceptions of the status of educated people. The aim of this study is to discuss the conditio postmoderna in the education system following the Declaration of Bologna, especially emphasising the thinking of K. Liessmann and G. Lipovetsky. This study also indicates the paradoxical effects of the reform process and compares them with classical ideals of the educated.

Keywords

EN

Education; humanistic ideals; conditio postmoderna; deconstruction of educated persons' status

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Journal of Pedagogy
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 99-119

Dates

published

2010-01-01

online

2011-02-14

Contributors

author

Martin Šarkan

• Faculty of Theology Department of Social Work, Trnava University, Kostolná 1, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia

author

Rastislav Nemec

• Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Trnava University, Kostolná 1, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia

References

• Adorno, T. W. 2009. Schéma masové kultury. Prague: OIKOYMENH.
• Andresen, S. 2007. Begriffe und Konzepte der Erziehungswissenschaft. Bielefeld: Auditoriumsverlag Jokers.
• Anzenbacher, A. 2004. Křesťanská sociální etika. Úvod a principy. Praha: CDK.
• Bieri, P. 2010: Wie wäre es, gebildet zu sein [online]
• Egger, R., Hackl, B. (eds.). 2010. Sinnliche Bildung?: Pädagogische Prozesse zwischen vorprädikativer Situierung und reflexivem Anspruch. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
• Fichte, J. G. 1971: Pojem vzdělance. Praha: Gaja.
• Fischer, E. P. 2004. Die Andere Bildung. Was man von den Naturwissenschaften wissen sollte. Berlin: Ullstein.
• Horyna, B. 2010. In unum vertere? Univerzita dnes [online]
• Humboldt, W. 1903-1936. Gesammelte Schriften. Band VII. Berlin: De Gruyer.
• Kant, I. 1993. Odpověď na otázku co je osvícenství. In Filosofický časopis, 41 (3): 381-387.
• Kellner, D. (et al.). 2009. Marcuse's Challendge to Education. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Liessmann, P. K. 2008. Teorie nevzdělanosti. Praha: Academia
• Lipovetsky, G. 1999. Soumrak povinnosti. Bezbolestná etika nových demokratických časú. Praha: Prostor.
• Lipovetsky, G. 2003. Éra prázdnoty. Úvahy o současném individualismu. Praha: Prostor.
• Lipovetsky, G. 2005. Věčný přepych. Praha: Prostor.
• Lipovetsky, G. 2007. Paradoxní štěstí. Praha: Prostor.
• Nakamur, Y., Hintersteiner, N., Scheidgen, H-J. 2005. Philosophie, Gesellschaft und Bildung in Zeiten der Globalisierung. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.
• Palmer, A. J. (ed.). 2001. Fifty Major Thinkers on Education. From Confucius to Dewey. London, New York: Routledge.
• Patterson, C. H. 1977. Foundations for Theory of Instruction and Educational Psychology. New York: Harper & Row.
• Schwanitz, D. 1999. Bildung. Alles was man wissen muß. Frankfurt am Main: Eichborn.
• Volkers, A. 2007. Wissen und Bildung bei Foucault. Aufklärung zwischen Wissenschaft und ethisch-ästhetischen Bildungsprozessen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10159-010-0012-7