Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2011 | 49 | 1 | 5-20

Article title

Analysis of Efficiency of Pilot's Behavior in Condition of Visual Illusion of False Horizon

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
This study examined efficiency of pilots' behavior in condition of visual illusion od false horizon. It has been assumed that visual illusion of false horizon tends to produce spatial disorientation.Efficiency of execution of flight's profile in conditions of spatial disorientation was analyzed in context of FDI. Additionally, efficiency of attention and working memory were analyzed. 29 pilots participated in the experiment (air-raid 1229, 14 hours +/- 844,26; age 32,97; +/- 6,56). Efficiency of execution of flight profile has been defined on simulator YAPETUS based on indicators of course - variability of rate. Styles of perception, efficiency of attentions and efficiency of working memory were researched by means of computer tasks. It appears that false horizon illusion influence the efficiency of pilot's behavior. In conditions of cognitive conflict: visual field - navigational instruments, younger pilots and pilots with FINT style of perception (mobile FD and fixed FI), lower efficiency of selective and divided attention, less resistance to distraction, weak mechanism of inhibition and lower efficiency of updating working memory, were most strongly exposed to disorientation.

Year

Volume

49

Issue

1

Pages

5-20

Physical description

Dates

published
2011-01-01
online
2011-09-22

Contributors

  • Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Lódzki

References

  • Asch, S. E., Witkin, H. A. (1948a). Studies in Space Orientation: Perception of the Upright with Displaced Visual Fields and With Body Tilted. Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 38, 455-477.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Asch, S. E, Witkin, H. A. (1948b). Studies in Space Orientation. I Perception Of The Upright With Displaced Visual Fields. Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 38, 325-337.[Crossref]
  • Baddeley, A. (2001). Is Working Memory Still Working? American Psychologist, 56, 851-865.
  • Bednarek, H., Orzechowski, J. (2008). Cognitive and temperamental predictors of field dependence-independence. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 39 (1), 54-65.
  • Bednarek, H., Truszczyński, O. (2010). Zróżnicowanie cech i struktury temperamentu pilotów zależnych i niezależnych od pola. Polski Przegląd Medycyny Lotniczej, 1, 9-16.
  • Benson, A., J. (2002). Spatial Disorientation - A Perspective. Aerospace Medicine, 7, 1-8.
  • Casner, S. (2010). General Aviation, [w:] E. Salas i D. Maurino (red.), Human Factors in Aviation (595-629). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Chuderski, A., Nęcka, E. (2004). Sprawność uwagi a inteligencja: model parametryczny w architek-turze poznawczej ACT-R. Studia Psychologiczne, 42, 1, 111-124.
  • Chuderska, A., Chuderski, A. (2009). Executive control in analogical reasoning: Beyond interference resolution. [w:] N. Taatgen i H. van Rijn (red.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (s. 1758-1763). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Cowan, N. (2005). Working - memory capacity limits in a theoretical context, [w:] C. Izawa i N. Ohta (red.), Human learning and memory: Advances in theory and application. Mahwah, N.J: Erlbaum.
  • Engle, R. W. (2001). What is working memory capacity? [w:] H. III Roediger I J. Nairne (red.), Nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert Crowder (s. 297-314). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
  • Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J. i Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capa city and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence and functions of the prefrontal cortex, [w:] A. Miyake i P. Shah (red.), Model of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gibb, R., Gray, R., i Scharff, L. (2010). Aviation visual perception. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach To Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Gillam, B. (1980). Geometrical Illusions. Scientific American, 242, 102-111.
  • Ginsburg, A. P. (1984). Visual Form Perception Based on Biological Filtering, [w:] L. Spillmann i B. R. Wotten (red.), Visual Form Perception Based On Biological Filtering (s. 53-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Girgus, J. S., i Coren, S. (1982). Assimilation and contrast illusions: Differences in plasticity. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 555-561.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Goodenough, D. R., Oltman, P. K., Snow, D., Cox, P. W. i Markowitz, D. (1991). Fiel Dependence-Independence and Embedded Figures Performance. [w:] S. Wapner i J. Demick (red.), Field Dependence-Independence: Cognitive Style Across The Life Span (s. 131-149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Green D., Swets J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
  • Gregory, R. L. (1997). Knowledge in Perception and Illusion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B: Biol. Sci., 352, 1121-1127.
  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kitaoka, A. (2007). Tilt illusions after Oyama (1960): A review. Japanese Psychological Research, 49, 7-19.[Crossref]
  • Klukowski, K., Truszczyński, O., i Kowalski, I (2005). Rola czynnika ludzkiego w bezpieczeństwie lotów doświadczenia lotnictwa wojskowego, [w:] K. Klukowski (red.), Medycyna wypadków w transporcie. Warszawa: Państwowe Zakłady Wydawnictw Lekarskich.
  • Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive Styles in the Context of Modern Psychology: Toward an Integrated Framework of Cognitive Style. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 3, 464-481.[WoS]
  • Króliczak, G. (1999). Dwa mózgi wzrokowe: percepcja a wzrokowa kontrola działania. Kognitywistyka i Media w Edukacji, 2, 1, 199-224.
  • Long, G. M., Ambler, R. K. i Guedry, F. E. (1975). Relationship Between Perceptual Style and Reactivity to Motion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 5, 599-605.
  • McElree, B. (2001). Working Memory and Focal Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory And Cognition, 27, 3, 817-835.
  • Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P. (1998). Attention and inhibition. W H. Pashler (red.). Attention (191-222). UK: Psychology Press.
  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Emerson, M., Witzki, A., Howerter, A. i Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contribution to complex "frontal lobe" tasks": A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
  • Miyake, A., Witzki, A. i Emerson, M. (2001). Field Dependence-Independence from a Working Memory Perspective: A Dual - Task Inventigation of The Hidden Figures Test. Memory, 9, 445-457.[Crossref]
  • Neil, W. T. Westberry, R. L. (1987). Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 327-334.
  • Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A. i Terry, (1995). Facilitatory and Inhibitory Aspects of Attention. [w:] F. A. Kramer, M. Coles i G. D. Logan (red.), Converging Operations i the Study of Visual Selective Attention (209-261). Washington, DC: APA.
  • Nęcka, E. (1995). Czy uwaga jest pojęciem jednorodnym? [w:] A. Biela, J. Brzeziński, T. Marek (red.), Społeczne, eksperymentalne i metodologiczne konteksty procesów poznawczych człowieka (s. 165-185). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Fundacji Humaniora.
  • Nęcka, E., Orzechowski, J. i Szymura, B. (2006). Psychologia Poznawcza. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Niaz, M. (1987). Mobility-Fixity Dimension in Witkin's Theory of Field-Dependence-Independence and its Implication for Problems Solving in Science. Perceptual And Motor Skills, 65, 755-764.
  • Orzechowski, J., Bednarek, H. (2004). Uwaga jako mechanizm zróżnicowania struktur poznawczych. Studia Psychologiczne, 42, 1, 125-137.
  • Pressey, A. W., Epp, D. (1992). Spatial attention in Ponzo-like patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 211-221.
  • Previc, F. H. (2004). Visual Illusion in Flight, [w:] F. H. Previc i W. Ercoline (red.), Spatial Disorientation in Aviation. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  • Prinzmetal, W., Beck, D. (2001). The Tilt-Constancy Theory of Visual Illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception And Performance, 27, 1, 206-217.
  • Prinzmetal, W., Shimamura, A. P., Mikolinski, M. (2001). The Ponzo Illusion and the Tilt - Constancy Theory. Perceptions & Psychophysics, 63, 99-114.
  • Rock, I. (1984). Perception. New York and Oxford: Freeman & Co.
  • Strelau, J. (2006). Temperament jako regulator zachowania. Sopot: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  • Szymura, B. (2008). Temperament uwagi. Kraków: TAiWPN Universitas.
  • Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effects: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
  • Wiegmann, D. i Shapell, S. A. (2000). Human Error Perspectives in Aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11 (4), 341-357.[WoS]
  • Witkin, H.A, Dyk, R. B., Feterson, N.F, Goodenough, D. R. i Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological Differentation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E. i Karp, S. A. (1971). A Manual for the Embedded Figures Tests. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.
  • Witkin, H. A., Goodenough, D. R. i Oltman, P. K. (1979). Psychological Differentation: Current Status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1127-1145.
  • Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. (2007). Perceived slant: A dissociation between perception and action. Perception, 36, 249-257.[WoS]

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_v10167-011-0001-z
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.